Vapor pressure simulations

Figure 9. Distribution of relative error for the three vapor pressure simulations (true value = 0.00).

Using the Equilibrium Vapor Pressure simulation eChapter 11.5), compare the vapor pressures of methanol, ethanol, acetic acid, water, and benzene, (a) Which compound appears to have the strongest intermolecular forces at 100°C (b) If one compound has a higher equilibrium vapor pressure than another at a particular temperature, will it necessarily have a higher equilibrium vapor pressure at all temperatures If not, give an example of two compounds whose vapor-pressure curves cross, and at what temperature they have roughly the same vapor pressure. 

Ethanol and acetic acid have very similar molar masses and both exhibit hydrogen bonding. In which of these two compoimds is hydrogen bonding a more significant component of the overall intermolecular forces Support your answer using data from the Equilibrium Vapor Pressure simulation eChapter 11.5). 

The Reid vapor pressure characterizes the light petroleum products it is measured by a standard test (refer to Chapter 7) which can be easily simulated. 

Polymer simulations can be mapped onto the Flory-Huggins lattice model. For this purpose, DPD can be considered an off-lattice version of the Flory-Huggins simulation. It uses a Flory-Huggins x (chi) parameter. The best way to obtain % is from vapor pressure data. Molecular modeling can be used to determine x, but it is less reliable. In order to run a simulation, a bead size for each bead type and a x parameter for each pair of beads must be known. 

Analysts should not rely on databases developed by others unless citations and regression resiilts are available. Many improper conclusions have been drawn when analysts have relied upon the databases supplied with commercial simulators. While they may be accurate in the temperature, pressure, or composition range upon which they were developed, there is no guarantee that they are accurate for the unit conditions in question. Pure component and mixture correlations should be developed for the conditions experienced in the plant. The set of database parameters must be internally consistent (e.g., mixture-phase equilibria parameters based on the pure-component vapor pressures that will be used in the analysis). This ensures a consistent set of database parameters. 

It can be seen from the previous description that the design of both a cold-feed stabilizer and a stabilizer with reflux is a rather complex and involved procedure. Distillation computer simulations are available that can be used to optimize the design of any stabilizer if the properties of the feed stream and desired vapor pressure of the bottoms product are known. Cases should be run of both a cold-feed stabilizer and one with reflux before a selection is made. Because of the large number of calculations required, it is not advisable to use hand calculation techniques to design a distillation process. There is too much opportunity for computational eiToi. 

The second category includes BLEVE simulation, in which a pressurized, heated flask containing liquid or liquefied fuel is broken after the desired vapor pressure has been reached, and the released vapor is then ignited. Measurement of fireball diameter, liftoff time, combustion duration, and final height is captured by filming with high-speed cameras. Radiometers are used to measure radiation and temperature is measured by thermocouples or by determination of fireball color temperature (Lihou and Maund 1982). 

Such simulations suggest that because of their relatively high water solubility which in combination with low vapor pressure causes low air-water partition coefficients, the phenols tend to remain in water or in soil and show little tendency to evaporate. Their environmental fate tends to be dominated by reaction in soil and water, and for the more sorptive species, in sediments. Their half-lives are relatively short, because of their susceptibility to degradation. 

The key problem now is to find a simple and reasonable expression for the boiling rate W. I have found in a number of simulations that a mass-transfer type of equation ean be conveniently employed. This kind of relationship also makes physical sense. Liquid boils because, at some temperature (and eomposi-tion if more than one component is present), it exerts a vapor pressure P greater than the pressure P in the vapor phase above it. The driving force is this pressure differential... 

Water temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico can be as high as 30°C along the coast during the summer. Use Table 8.3 to estimate the vapor pressure of seawater at that temperature and at 100°C and 0°C, assuming that a 0.50 m NaCl(aq) solution simulates seawater. 

A correlation can be made between the measured magnitude of the waveguide signals and the vapor pressures of the condensed vapors sensed. Three of the five polymer films tested showed extremely large responses to the simulant dimethyl methyl phosphonate (DUMP), and one of these films could detect DUMP vapor concentrations below the 20 ppm level. 

Fig. 22 Simulated images (upper panel) and SFM phase images (300 x 300 nm) (lower panel) presenting classical topological defect configurations in lying cylinders (a, e) cyl-dislocation (b, f) m-dislocation (c, g) +1/2 cyl-disclination and (d, h) +1/2 m-disclination. SB films were annealed under 70% of the saturated vapor pressure of chloroform. Reprinted from [36], with permission. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society...

Physical constants for chlorobenzene, especially its vapor pressure and water solubility, indicate that the air is an important and perhaps the dominant medium for the transport and transformation of chlorobenzene. As an aromatic molecule with strong UV-absorption, chlorobenzene has a half-life of 20 to 40 hrs under simulated atmospheric conditions (Dilling et al. 1976). This appears to be confirmed by the large difference between chlorobenzene measurements in urban air (3,000 ng/m ) and in rural air (not detected) in 1982 (Brodzinsky and Singh 1983). 

Equation (9.1) is the preferred method of describing membrane performance because it separates the two contributions to the membrane flux the membrane contribution, P /C and the driving force contribution, (pio — p,r). Normalizing membrane performance to a membrane permeability allows results obtained under different operating conditions to be compared with the effect of the operating condition removed. To calculate the membrane permeabilities using Equation (9.1), it is necessary to know the partial vapor pressure of the components on both sides of the membrane. The partial pressures on the permeate side of the membrane, p,e and pje, are easily obtained from the total permeate pressure and the permeate composition. However, the partial vapor pressures of components i and j in the feed liquid are less accessible. In the past, such data for common, simple mixtures would have to be found in published tables or calculated from an appropriate equation of state. Now, commercial computer process simulation programs calculate partial pressures automatically for even complex mixtures with reasonable reliability. This makes determination of the feed liquid partial pressures a trivial exercise. 

Triazine herbicides such as atrazine and cyanazine are not tightly adsorbed to surface crop residue, allowing rainfall to wash intercepted herbicide into the soil. Low vapor pressures also avoid excessive vapor losses of residue-intercepted triazine herbicides. When atrazine was applied to corn-stalk residue, 52% of the herbicide washed off the stalk residue by the first 0.5 cm of simulated rainfall (Martin et al., 1978). After 3.5 cm of rain, 89% of the intercepted atrazine had washed off the residue. Similarly, in another study (Baker and Shiers, 1989), 75% of applied cyanazine washed off com-stalk residue with 0.7 cm of simulated rain, and an additional 11% was recovered from the residue. 

Each chemical simulated must have values provided for its vapor pressure and solubility or Henry s constant, Kh, and its organic carbon partition coefficient, Koc an< ts degradation rate, y. 

Table 1 gives the components present in the crude DDSO and their properties critical pressure (Pc), critical temperature (Tc), critical volume (Vc) and acentric factor (co). These properties were obtained from hypothetical components (a tool of the commercial simulator HYSYS) that are created through the UNIFAC group contribution. The developed DISMOL simulator requires these properties (mean free path enthalpy of vaporization mass diffusivity vapor pressure liquid density heat capacity thermal conductivity viscosity and equipment, process, and system characteristics that are simulation inputs) in calculating other properties of the system, such as evaporation rate, temperature and concentration profiles, residence time, stream compositions, and flow rates (output from the simulation). Furthermore, film thickness and liquid velocity profile on the evaporator are also calculated. 

For the systems studied in the present work, these constants are not available. However, a graphic is available that depicts the vapor pressure curve of fitosterols and tocopherols (16). From this graphic, the constants A, B, and C of the Antoine equation were obtained. These values were introduced in the DISMOL simulator. 

Pure component physical property data for the five species in our simulation of the HDA process were obtained from Chemical Engineering (1975) (liquid densities, heat capacities, vapor pressures, etc.). Vapor-liquid equilibrium behavior was assumed to be ideal. Much of the flowsheet and equipment design information was extracted from Douglas (1988). We have also determined certain design and control variables (e.g., column feed locations, temperature control trays, overhead receiver and column base liquid holdups.) that are not specified by Douglas. Tables 10.1 to 10.4 contain data for selected process streams. These data come from our TMODS dynamic simulation and not from a commercial steady-state simulation package. The corresponding stream numbers are shown in Fig. 10.1. In our simulation, the stabilizer column is modeled as a component splitter and tank. A heater is used to raise the temperature of the liquid feed stream to the product column. Table 10.5 presents equipment data and Table 10.6 compiles the heat transfer rates within process equipment. 

---