Names, trivial

Enzymes are classified in terms of the reactions which they catalyse and were formerly named by adding the suffix ase to the substrate or to the process of the reaction. In order to clarify the confusing nomenclature a system has been developed by the International Union of Biochemistry and the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (see Enzyme Nomenclature , Elsevier, 1973). The enzymes are classified into divisions based on the type of reaction catalysed and the particular substrate. The suffix ase is retained and recommended trivial names and systematic names for classification are usually given when quoting a particular enzyme. Any one particular enzyme has a specific code number based upon the new classification. 

Oxidoreduciases. Enzymes catalysing redox reactions. The substrate which is oxidized is regarded as the hydrogen donor. This group includes the trivially named enzymes, dehydrogenases, oxidases, reductases, peroxidases, hydrogenases and hydroxylases. 

Neville-Wintber acid The trivial name given to 4-hydroxy-1-naphthalene sulphonic acid. 

Colan The trivial name given to di-phenylethyne (diphenyl acetylene), CflHs C = C CeHs- Obtained as volatile colourless crystals, m.p. 6TC, by HgO oxidation of benzil bis-hydrazone. 

In 1814, J.J. Berzelius succeeded for the first time in systematically naming chemical substances by building on the results of quantitative analyses and on the definition of the term "element by Lavoisier. In the 19th century, the number of known chemical compounds increased so rapidly that it became essential to classify them, to avoid a complete chaos of trivial names (see Section 2.2.4). 

The systematic lUPAC nomenclature of compounds tries to characterize compounds by a unique name. The names are quite often not as compact as the trivial names, which are short and simple to memorize. In fact, the lUPAC name can be quite long and cumbersome. This is one reason why trivial names are still heavily used today. The basic aim of the lUPAC nomenclature is to describe particular parts of the structure (fi agments) in a systematic manner, with special expressions from a vocabulary of terms. Therefore, the systematic nomenclature can be, and is, used in database systems such as the Chemical Abstracts Service (see Section 5.4) as index for chemical structures. However, this notation does not directly allow the extraction of additional information about the molecule, such as bond orders or molecular weight. 

In the example of Figure 2-5, the compound has the trivial name phenylalanine but the lUPAC name is 2-amino-3-phenylpropanoic acid, which indicates a carbon... 

Neither a trivial name nor the systematic nomenclature, which both represent the structure as an alphanumerical (text) string, is ideal for computer proccs.sing. The reason is that various valid compound names can describe one chemical structure (Figure 2-6). As a consequence, the name/structure correlation is unambiguous but not unique. Nowadays, programs can translate names to structures, and. structitrcs to names, to make published structures accessible in electronic journals (see also Chapter (I, Section 2 in the Handbook). 

The problem of perception complete structures is related to the problem of their representation, for which the basic requirements are to represent as much as possible the functionality of the structure, to be unique, and to allow the restoration of the structure. Various approaches have been devised to this end. They comprise the use of molecular formulas, molecular weights, trade and/or trivial names, various line notations, registry numbers, constitutional diagrams 2D representations), atom coordinates (2D or 3D representations), topological indices, hash codes, and others (see Chapter 2). 

Table 1.5 Trivial Names of Heterocyclic Systems Suitable for Use in Fusion...

Table 1.6 Trivial Names for Heterocyclic Systems That Are Not Recommended...

Tablel.10 Retained Trivial Names of Alcohols and Phenols with Structures 1.24...

Alkanes. The saturated open-chain (acyclic) hydrocarbons (C H2 +2) have names ending in -ane. The first four members have the trivial names methane (CH4), ethane (CH3CH3 or C2H5), propane (C3H8), and butane (C4Hjo). For the remainder of the alkanes, the first portion of the name... 

These trivial names may be used for the unsubstituted hydrocarbon only ... 

Monocyclic Aromatic Compounds. Except for six retained names, all monocyclic substituted aromatic hydrocarbons are named systematically as derivatives of benzene. Moreover, if the substituent introduced into a compound with a retained trivial name is identical with one already present in that compound, the compound is named as a derivative of benzene. These names are retained ... 

The position of substituents is indicated by numbers, with the lowest locant possible given to substituents. When a name is based on a recognized trivial name, priority for lowest-numbered locants is given to substituents implied by the bivial name. When only two substituents are present on a benzene ring, their position may be indicated by o- ortho-), m- meta-), and p- (para-) (and alphabetized in the order given) used in place of 1,2-, 1,3-, and 1,4-, respectively. 

Radicals derived from monocyclic substituted aromatic hydrocarbons and having the free valence at a ring atom (numbered 1) are named phenyl (for benzene as parent, since benzyl is used for the radical C5H5CH2—), cumenyl, mesityl, tolyl, and xylyl. All other radicals are named as substituted phenyl radicals. For radicals having a single free valence in the side chain, these trivial names are retained ... 

Recognized trivial names for composite radicals are used if they lead to simplifications in naming. Examples are... 

Eulvene, for methylenecyclopentadiene, and stilbene, for 1,2-diphenylethylene, are trivial names that are retained. 

---