Trace metals anodic stripping voltammetry

The methods of investigation of metal species in natural waters must possess by well dividing ability and high sensitivity and selectivity to determination of several metal forms. The catalytic including chemiluminescent (CL) techniques and anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) are the most useful to determination of trace metals and their forms. The methods considered ai e characterized by a low detection limits. Moreover, they allow detection of the most toxic form of metals, that is, metal free ions and labile complexes. 

Pretreatment of the collected particulate matter may be required for chemical analysis. Pretreatment generally involves extraction of the particulate matter into a liquid. The solution may be further treated to transform the material into a form suitable for analysis. Trace metals may be determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AA), emission spectroscopy, polarogra-phy, and anodic stripping voltammetry. Analysis of anions is possible by colorimetric techniques and ion chromatography. Sulfate (S04 ), sulfite (SO-, ), nitrate (NO3 ), chloride Cl ), and fluoride (F ) may be determined by ion chromatography (15). 

Measurement techniques that can be employed for the determination of trace metals include atomic absorption spectrometry, anodic stripping voltammetry, differential pulse cathodic stripping voltammetry, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, liquid chromatography of the metal chelates with ultraviolet-visible absorption and, more recently, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. 

Stolzberg [143] has reviewed the potential inaccuracies of anodic stripping voltammetry and differential pulse polarography in determining trace metal speciation, and thereby bio-availability and transport properties of trace metals in natural waters. In particular it is stressed that nonuniform distribution of metal-ligand species within the polarographic cell represents another limitation inherent in electrochemical measurement of speciation. Examples relate to the differential pulse polarographic behaviour of cadmium complexes of NTA and EDTA in seawater. 

Most of our understanding of the marine chemistry of trace metals rests on research done since 1970. Prior to this, the accuracy of concentration measurements was limited by lack of instrumental sensitivity and contamination problems. The latter is a consequence of the ubiquitous presence of metal in the hulls of research vessels, paint, hydrowires, sampling bottles, and laboratories. To surmount these problems, ultra-clean sampling and analysis techniques have been developed. New methods such as anodic stripping voltammetry are providing a means by which concentration measurements can be made directly in seawater and pore waters. Most other methods require the laborious isolation of the trace metals from the sample prior to analysis to eliminate interferences caused by the highly concentrated major ions. 

Cadmium in acidified aqueous solution may be analyzed at trace levels by various instrumental techniques such as flame and furnace atomic absorption, and ICP emission spectrophotometry. Cadmium in solid matrices is extracted into aqueous phase by digestion with nitric acid prior to analysis. A much lower detection level may be obtained by ICP-mass spectrometry. Other instrumental techniques to analyze this metal include neutron activation analysis and anodic stripping voltammetry. Cadmium also may be measured in aqueous matrices by colorimetry. Cadmium ions react with dithizone to form a pink-red color that can be extracted with chloroform. The absorbance of the solution is measured by a spectrophotometer and the concentration is determined from a standard calibration curve (APHA, AWWA and WEF. 1999. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. Washington, DC American Public Health Association). The metal in the solid phase may be determined nondestructively by x-ray fluorescence or diffraction techniques. 

The concentration levels of most trace metals and metalloids lie below 1000 pg P . Therefore, the classical methods of analysis do not have the required sensitivity. Among the instrumental techniques that have been extensively used for the analysis of biological materials include, atomic absorption spectrometry, plasma emission spectrometry, anodic stripping voltammetry and neutron activation analysis. 

Komorsky-Lovrfc, S., and M. Branica. 1987. Trace metal speciation by anodic stripping voltammetry. Part VII. Interaction of zinc with chloride, nitrate, sulfate, iodide and hydroxide. J. Electroanal. Chem. 226 253-261. 

The analytical use of GECE modified in situ by using bismuth solution for square wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV) of heavy metals is also studied [36]. The use of this novel format is a simpler alternative to the use of mercury for analysis of trace levels of heavy metals. The applicability of these new surface-modified GECE to real samples (tap water and soil samples) is presented. 

Figura, E and McDuffie, B. (1979) Use of Chelex resin for determination of labile trace metal fractions in aqueous ligand media and comparison of the method with anodic stripping voltammetry. Anal. Client., 51, 120-128.

Clem, R.G. and A.T. Hodgson. 1978. Ozone oxidation of organic sequestering agents in water prior to the determination of trace metals by anodic stripping voltammetry. Anal. Chem. 50 102-110. 

Twenty years ago the main applications of electrochemistry were trace-metal analysis (polarography and anodic stripping voltammetry) and selective-ion assay (pH, pNa, pK via potentiometry). A secondary focus was the use of voltammetry to characterize transition-metal coordination complexes (metal-ligand stoichiometry, stability constants, and oxidation-reduction thermodynamics). With the commercial development of (1) low-cost, reliable poten-tiostats (2) pure, inert glassy-carbon electrodes and (3) ultrapure, dry aptotic solvents, molecular characterization via electrochemical methodologies has become accessible to nonspecialists (analogous to carbon-13 NMR and GC/MS). 

The four variations of this technique are to be found in Table 14.2. The schemes of operation are shown in Fig. 14.6. Important applications for trace metals are the use of anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) to determine trace quantities of copper, cadmium, lead and zinc, and adsorptive stripping voltammetry (AdSV) of trace quantities of nickel and cobalt—pre-concentration by adsorption accumulation of the oxime complexes followed by reduction to the metal is employed, as reoxidation of these metals in ASV is kinetically slow and does not lead to well-defined stripping peaks. 

Kefala, G. and Economou, A. (2006), Polymer-coated bismuth film electrodes for the determination of trace metals by sequential-injection analysis/anodic stripping voltammetry. Anal. Chim. Acta, 576(2) 283-289. 

Brezonik, P.L., Brauner, P.A., and Stumm, W. Trace metal analysis by anodic stripping voltammetry effect of sorption by natural and model organic compounds. Water Res. 10, 605-612 (1976). 

Olsen et al. (48, 20) have described an interesting method for the determination of lead in polluted seawater using FIA and flame atomic absorption spectroscopy. The system incorporates a Chelex-100 column for on-line preconcentration of the sample. The preconcentration and elution step improves the detection limit for lead by a factor of four (50 nM). Further increases in sensitivity are easily possible. The combination of this preconcentration step with a more sensitive detector, such as anodic stripping voltammetry, may make possible the determination of trace metals in seawater on a routine basis. 

Improvements on a computer-controlled instrument for performing trace-metal analysis by anodic stripping voltammetry are presented and discussed. The ease of operation of the instrument has been improved by the use of carbon-disc electrodes and spool-type Teflon valves. The device has been used to measure Zn, Cd, Pb, and Cu in estuarine waters recently an attempt was made to measure Cu in surface oceanic waters. Although the sensitivity and accuracy of the instrument appear insufficient for the measurement of Cu in oceanic surface waters, the approach appears promising for future work. 

Analytical methods have been developed which are sensitive enough to measure the low concentration levels of trace metals in seawater. Well defined methods, like emission spectroscopy, neutron activation analysis, anodic stripping voltammetry, atomic absorption spectroscopy, and mass spectroscopy, can be used individually or collectively to obtain the necessary data on trace metal concentrations. So why, even with these well developed methods, are we not getting reliable results from the analysis of trace metals in natural water ... 

L. Mart, H. W. Nurnberg, D. Dyrssen, Low level determination of trace metals in arctic sea water and snow by differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry. In C. S. Wong, E. Boyle, K. W. Bruland, J. D. Burton, E. D. Goldberg (Eds.), Trace Metals in Sea IVater, Plenum Press, New York, (1988), 113-130. 

Analytical techniques used for clinical trace metal analysis include photometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS), inductively coupled plasma optical emission (ICP-OES), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Other techniques, such as neutron activation analysis (NAA) and x-ray fluorescence (XRF), and electrochemical methods, such as anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV), are used less commonly For example. NAA requires a nuclear irradiation facility and is not readily available and ASV requires completely mineralized solutions for analysis, which is a time-consuming process. 

---