Trace analysis, precisions

Analysis of Corexit 9527. Corexit 9527 in natural waters can be analyzed. The method is based on the formation of a Z>w(ethylenediamine) copper(II) complex, extraction of the complex into methylisobutylketone, and atomic absorption spectroscopy [1564]. The method is suitable for a concentration range of 2 to 100 mg/liter, with a precision as low as 5% relative to standard deviation for samples in the middle- to high range. Only a small sample volume (10 ml) is required. The sensitivity may be substantially increased for trace analysis by increasing the sample volume. 

Trace analysis is particularly attractive for SFE-HPLC since quantitative transfer of all analytes extracted to the chromatographic system becomes possible. At present, on-line SFE-HPLC appears to be feasible for qualitative analysis only quantitation is difficult due to possible pump and detector precision problems. Sample size restrictions also appear to be another significant barrier to using on-line SFE-HPLC for quantitative analysis of real samples. On-line SFE-HPLC has therefore not proven to be a very popular hyphenated sample preparatory/separation technique. Although online SFE-HPLC has not been quantitatively feasible, SFE is quite useful for quantitative determination of those analytes that must be analysed by off-line HPLC, and should not be ruled out when considering sample preparatory techniques. In most cases, all of the disadvantages mentioned with the on-line technique (Table 7.15) are eliminated. On- and off-line SFE-HPLC were reviewed [24,128]. 

Applications The application of the isotope dilution technique is especially useful in carrying out precise and accurate micro and trace analyses. The most accurate results in mass spectrometry are obtained if the isotope dilution technique is applied (RSDs better than 1 % in trace analysis). Therefore, application of IDMS is especially recommended for calibration of other analytical data, and for certification of standard reference materials. The technique also finds application in the field of isotope geology, and is used in the nuclear industry for quantitative isotope analysis. 

According to the demands of the analysis, analytical chemistry can be classified into analysis of major components (major component analysis, precision analysis, investigation of stoichiometry), minor components, and trace components (trace analysis, ultra trace analysis). On the other hand, analytical problems are differentiated according to the number of analytes involved. Accordingly, single component and multicomponent analysis are distinguished. 

It is a well-known fact that the precision in trace analysis decreases with diminishing concentration in a similar way as it does with decreasing sample weight (Sect. 2.1). The dependency of the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviation on the concentration of analytes has been investigated systematically at first by Horwitz et al. [1980] on the basis of thousands of pieces of interlaboratory data (mostly from food analysis). The result of the study has been represented in form of the well-known Horwitz trumpet which is represented in Fig. 7.3. 

In general, in trace analysis concessions must be made with regard to precision and accuracy. However, accuracy has strictly to be distinguished from precision. 

A most widely used technique for quantitative trace analysis. Used as an adjunct to other spectrometric techniques in the identification and structural analysis of organic materials. Relative precision 0.5-5%. 

It is important to note that with hydrodynamic injection a volume of sample is injected, which has representative amounts (concentration) of the sample constituents. This characteristic, together with a better precision, makes it the most widely used injection technique in CE. However, owing to the poor detectability in terms of concentration of the widely used detectors (see further), its application is rather limited to the analysis of high-concentration samples. In trace analysis, for example, electromigration is favored over hydrodynamic injection [42],... 

These rules may appear very daunting but there are a number of tools commercially available for trace analysis. Before defining the best analytical procedure, it is important to define clearly the objectives of the analytical procedure. The analytical procedure and the instrumental requirements must be considered how many elements need to be determined, what level of precision is required and in what form are the samples submitted for analysis Another important parameter is the time available to obtain the result. 

For the largest field of application for LA-ICP-MS - geological research - many different geological and glass standard reference materials are available. Using standard reference materials in LA-ICP-MS, analytical results for trace analysis in homogeneous samples can be obtained with an accuracy better than 10%, and a precision of 2-5% is also possible.25 If no suitable CRM... 

Further details of different strategies in solution calibration are described in the literature.1 29 76 79 Precise and accurate measurements of isotope ratios, which is one of the major advantages of mass spectrometric techniques, are a requirement for the application of isotope dilution techniques in trace analysis, which is also the main goal of the application of isotope dilution in solution based calibration in LA-ICP-MS. 

For measurements of isotope ratios or isotope abundances, any of the mass spectrometers discussed in the previous chapters, such as SSMS, LIMS, GDMS56 and LA-ICP-MS,6 are of benefit for the direct isotope analysis of solid samples. SSMS and LIMS are rarely applied in isotope analysis due to their relatively low precision. Several applications of the isotope dilution technique as a calibration strategy in SSMS, mostly on geological samples, are known.57-59 GDMS has been mostly applied in multi-element trace analysis and depth profiling and plays only a minor role... 

A study of mercury in Lake Michigan found levels near 1.6 pM (1.6 X 10 12 M), which is two orders of magnitude below concentrations observed in many earlier studies.5 Previous investigators apparently unknowingly contaminated their samples. A study of handling techniques for the analysis of lead in rivers investigated variations in sample collection, sample containers, protection during transportation from the field to the lab, filtration techniques, chemical preservatives, and preconcentration procedures.6 Each individual step that deviated from best practice doubled the apparent concentration of lead in stream water. Clean rooms with filtered air supplies are essential in trace analysis. Even with the best precautions, the precision of trace analysis becomes poorer as the concentration of analyte decreases (Box 5-2). 

A modest perusal of the literature that may be pertinent to the topic of trace analysis can easily convince the reader that this is a field reserved to witchcraft and black magic. It would appear also to be reserved to those who have inordinate amounts of time on their hands. In part this is most certainly due to the nature of trace analysis since it clearly involves seeking the proverbial "needle in the haystack." However, in this case not only are all the sought needles different, each of the haystacks is also different. Thus, it tends to imply that for each specific problem of trace analysis brought to the analytical laboratory, a specific procedure must be developed or employed. This particular circumstance is not precisely stated by the individual contributor to the literature. It requires an overview of many of these contributions to derive that conclusion. 

Since trace analysis also includes air or gas samples, it is appropriate to point out that proper addition of an internal standard to this type of sample is difficult. This difficulty lies, not in the mechanical problem of transfer, but in the difficulty of knowing that the precisely intended volume has properly been transferred. However, the internal standard technique is still not widely used here for the same reason it is not generally used in trace analysis. This reason again is because the analyst normally has no prior knowledge of the variation in composition from sample to sample. The continual risk exists that any given sample in a series will have a component, not present in others, which elutes with the internal standard. This occurrence would introduce significant error into the quantitative calculations which result. 

By contrast, colorimetry is relatively simple and inexpensive. Procedures exist not only for all the metals but for many nonmetallic constituents and organic compounds. It is undoubtedly the most widely applied technique in trace analysis, and the colorimeter or spectrophotometer tends to be the work-horse of the laboratory. Sensitivities are astonishingly great, and quantitative precision varies from a few percent... 

Typically splitless injection is used for trace analysis by capillary GC. Splitless injections can exhibit problems with carryover, poor repeatability, and labile analytes. Penton (1991) reports improved results with the temperature-programmable injector. With a temperature-programmable injector, samples are injected into a glass insert at an injector temperature below the boiling point of the analysis solvent the injector temperature is then rapidly programmed to a higher value. Penton reported this technique offered greater ease of optimization and improved precision. 

Trace analysis requires a high degree of accuracy and precision, since contaminants measured at ppb or even ppt levels, and sometimes lower, may pose human and/or ecological health hazards [WENNING and ERICKSON, 1994],... 

The availability of instrumentation in the QC laboratory or at the production facility will often influence the choice of the analytical technique. For example, the trace analysis of a DS for three different metal elements (iron, copper, and nickel) can be simultaneously performed by an inductively coupled plasma (ICP). The cost of this instrument, however, is 100,000 or more. For this example, the same analysis can be performed to the level of precision and detection defined in the technical objective by an A A spectrometer. Unlike the ICP, the AA analysis is sequential, and therefore is significantly more time-consuming. The choice of the A A method may be desirable, however, since the instrumentation cost is afraction ofthe cost of an ICP, and often is an instrument already available in a QC or production laboratory. 

Precision is particularly important when sample preparation is involved. The variability can also affect accuracy. It is well known that reproducibility of an analysis decreases disproportionately with decreasing concentration [2], A typical relationship is shown in Figure 1.4, which shows that the uncertainty in trace analysis increases exponentially compared to the major and minor component analysis. Additional deviations to this curve are expected if sample preparation steps are added to the process. It may be prudent to assume that uncertainty from sample preparation would also increase with decrease in concentration. Generally speaking, analytical... 

Precision of flow rates from solvent delivery systems Precision in LC analysis Improved sensitivity for trace analysis Recirculation of mobile phase UV and EC detection Baseline drift Rl detection Conductivity detection Summary... 

---