Temperature programmed column

Elemental composition Ni 34.38%, C 28.13%, O 37.48%. The compound may be identified and measured quantitatively by GC/MS. An appropriately diluted solution in benzene, acetone, or a suitable organic solvent may be analyzed. Alternatively, nickel tetracarbonyl may be decomposed thermally at 200°C, the liberated carbon monoxide purged with an inert gas, and transported onto the cryogenically cooled injector port of a GC followed by analysis with GC-TCD on a temperature-programmed column. Nickel may be analyzed by various instrumental techniques following digestion of the compound with nitric acid and diluting appropriately (See Nickel). 

Figure 13. A plot of retention time against retention time for pyrolysis products on temperature programmed columns coated with OV-1 and OV-17 stationary phase, respectively [80]...

Temperature program, column a. Heating from 180° to 240°C with 4°C/min... 

Earlier Method Isothermal Column Temperature Programmed Column... 

Cehte or firebrick packing for glc columns is often treated with TMCS, DMCS, or other volatile silylating agents (see Table 1) to reduce tailing by polar organic compounds. A chemically bonded methyl siUcone support is stable for temperature programming to 390°C and allows elution of hydrocarbons up to C q (20). 

After adequate analitical prepai ation according to standai d EPA method 608 samples were analysed gas chromatographic on a gas chromatograph 8500 Perkin Elmer, in glass and capilar columns using a capture electron detector and mass spectrometry, temperature program. 

For example, consider an open tubular column with the dimensions previously defined, operated at constant mass flow rate of helium (which is normal for temperature programming purposes), then, from Poiseuille s equation, after time (t),... 

Peak capacity can be very effectively improved by using temperature programming in GC or gradient elution in LC. However, if the mixture is very complex with a large number of individual solutes, then the same problem will often arise even under programming conditions. These difficulties arise as a direct result of the limited peak capacity of the column. It follows that it would be useful to derive an equation that... 

This equation, although originating from the plate theory, must again be considered as largely empirical when employed for TLC. This is because, in its derivation, the distribution coefficient of the solute between the two phases is considered constant throughout the development process. In practice, due to the nature of the development as already discussed for TLC, the distribution coefficient does not remain constant and, thus, the expression for column efficiency must be considered, at best, only approximate. The same errors would be involved if the equation was used to calculate the efficiency of a GC column when the solute was eluted by temperature programming or in LC where the solute was eluted by gradient elution. If the solute could be eluted by a pure solvent such as n-heptane on a plate that had been presaturated with the solvent vapor, then the distribution coefficient would remain sensibly constant over the development process. Under such circumstances the efficiency value would be more accurate and more likely to represent a true plate efficiency. 

The ability of a GC column to theoretically separate a multitude of components is normally defined by the capacity of the column. Component boiling point will be an initial property that determines relative component retention. Superimposed on this primary consideration is then the phase selectivity, which allows solutes of similar boiling point or volatility to be differentiated. In GC X GC, capacity is now defined in terms of the separation space available (11). As shown below, this space is an area determined by (a) the time of the modulation period (defined further below), which corresponds to an elution property on the second column, and (b) the elution time on the first column. In the normal experiment, the fast elution on the second column is conducted almost instantaneously, so will be essentially carried out under isothermal conditions, although the oven is temperature programmed. Thus, compounds will have an approximately constant peak width in the first dimension, but their widths in the second dimension will depend on how long they take to elute on the second column (isothermal conditions mean that later-eluting peaks on 2D are broader). In addition, peaks will have a variance (distribution) in each dimension depending on... 

Figure 12.7 Cliromatograms of a polycarbonate sample (a) microcolumn SEC ti ace (b) capillary GC ti ace of inti oduced fractions. SEC conditions fused-silica (30 cm X 250 mm i.d.) packed with PL-GEL (50 A pore size, 5 mm particle diameter) eluent, THE at aElow rate of 2.0ml/min injection size, 200 NL UV detection at 254 nm x represents the polymer additive fraction ti ansfeired to EC system (ca. 6 p-L). GC conditions DB-1 column (15m X 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 pm film thickness) deactivated fused-silica uncoated inlet (5 m X 0.32 mm i.d.) temperature program, 100 °C for 8 min, rising to 350 °C at a rate of 12°C/min flame ionization detection. Peak identification is as follows 1, 2,4-rert-butylphenol 2, nonylphenol isomers 3, di(4-tert-butylphenyl) carbonate 4, Tinuvin 329 5, solvent impurity 6, Ii gaphos 168 (oxidized). Reprinted with permission from Ref. (14).

Figure 12.22 SFC-GC analysis of aromatic fraction of a gasoline fuel, (a) SFC trace (b) GC ttace of the aromatic cut. SFC conditions four columns (4.6 mm i.d.) in series (silica, silver-loaded silica, cation-exchange silica, amino-silica) 50 °C 2850 psi CO2 mobile phase at 2.5 niL/min FID detection. GC conditions methyl silicone column (50 m X 0.2 mm i.d.) injector split ratio, 80 1 injector temperature, 250 °C earner gas helium temperature programmed, — 50 °C (8 min) to 320 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min FID detection. Reprinted from Journal of Liquid Chromatography, 5, P. A. Peaden and M. L. Lee, Supercritical fluid chromatography methods and principles , pp. 179-221, 1987, by courtesy of Marcel Dekker Inc.

Programmed Temperature Injectors The programmed temperature injector is held near the boiling point of the solvent after injection of the sample, it is temperature programmed rapidly until it reaches the desired maximum temperature, which is normally higher than that of an isothermal (constant temperature) injector. As the sample components vaporize, they are transferred onto the head of the GC column. This technique is a varia-... 

The purity of 1 and 2 is assessed by analytical gas-liquid chromatography (GC) on a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame-ionization detector and fitted with a 50 m x 0.2 mm HP-5 fused silica glass capillary column using linear temperature programming from an initial temperature of 150°C for 5 min to a final temperature of 200°C for 10 min at a rate of 5°C/min. 

The use of a fused silica capillary column for the GC analysis of the neutral oil extract has provided the means for improving the resolution of components in a more inert system. The sultones are determined by temperature-programmed GC over CP-Sil-5 CB (methyl silicone fluid) in a 25 m x 0.2 mm fused silica capillary column using nonadecane as internal standard. A sample split ratio of 1 100 is recommended for a 3-pl injection. 

Chromatography Hewlett-Packard Ultra2 (25 m x 0.33 mm) cross-linked phenyl methyl silicone fused silica capillary column. Temperature program 55° (1 min.) -I- 30°C/min. to 180°C, and 4°C/min. to 320°C. 

---