Efficiency sweep

Keywords compressibility, primary-, secondary- and enhanced oil-recovery, drive mechanisms (solution gas-, gas cap-, water-drive), secondary gas cap, first production date, build-up period, plateau period, production decline, water cut, Darcy s law, recovery factor, sweep efficiency, by-passing of oil, residual oil, relative permeability, production forecasts, offtake rate, coning, cusping, horizontal wells, reservoir simulation, material balance, rate dependent processes, pre-drilling. 

The macroscopic sweep efficiency s the fraction of the total reservoir which is swept by water (or by gas in the case of gas cap drive). This will depend upon the reservoir quality and continuity, and the rate at which the displacement takes place. At higher rates, displacement will take place even more preferentially in the high permeability layers, and the macroscopic displacement efficiency will be reduced. 

This is why an offtake limit on the plateau production rate is often imposed, to limit the amount of by-passed oil, and increase the macroscopic sweep efficiency. 

This must be combined with the macroscopic sweep efficiency to determine the recovery factor (RF) for oil (in this example). 

Field analogues should be based on reservoir rock type (e.g. tight sandstone, fractured carbonate), fluid type, and environment of deposition. This technique should not be overlooked, especially where little information is available, such as at the exploration stage. Summary charts such as the one shown in Figure 8.19 may be used in conjunction with estimates of macroscopic sweep efficiency (which will depend upon well density and positioning, reservoir homogeneity, offtake rate and fluid type) and microscopic displacement efficiency (which may be estimated if core measurements of residual oil saturation are available). 

Miscible processes are aimed at recovering oil which would normally be left behind as residual oil, by using a displacing fluid which actually mixes with the oil. Because the miscible drive fluid is usually more mobile than oil, it tends to bypass the oil giving rise to a low macroscopic sweep efficiency. The method is therefore best suited to high dip reservoirs. Typical miscible drive fluids include hydrocarbon solvents, hydrocarbon gases, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. 

There are two principal mechanisms of enhanced oil recovery increasing volumetric sweep efficiency of the injected fluid and increasing oil displacement efficiency by the injected fluid. In both, chemicals are used to modify the properties of an injected fluid whether water, steam, a miscible gas such as CO2 or natural gas, or an immiscible gas, usually nitrogen. Poor reservoir volumetric sweep efficiency is the greatest obstacle to increasing oil recovery (9). 

The pressure/composition requirement for miscibility limits the oil reservoirs in which this technology has been appHed. However, the low iajected fluid viscosity often results in poor volumetic sweep efficiency. 

Polymer Flooding. Even in the absence of fractures and thief 2ones, the volumetric sweep efficiency of injected fluids can be quite low. The poor volumetric sweep efficiency exhibited in waterfloods is related to the mobiUty ratio, Af, the mobiUty of the injected water in the highly flooded (low oil saturation) rock, divided by the mobiUty of the oil in oil-bearing portions of the reservoir, (72,73). The mobiUty ratio is related to the rock permeabihty to oil, and injected water, and to the viscosity of these fluids by the following equation ... 

The WAG process has been used extensively in the field, particularly in supercritical CO2 injection, with considerable success (22,157,158). However, a method to further reduce the viscosity of injected gas or supercritical fluid is desired. One means of increasing the viscosity of CO2 is through the use of supercritical C02-soluble polymers and other additives (159). The use of surfactants to form low mobihty foams or supercritical CO2 dispersions within the formation has received more attention (160—162). Foam has also been used to reduce mobihty of hydrocarbon gases and nitrogen. The behavior of foam in porous media has been the subject of extensive study (4). X-ray computerized tomographic analysis of core floods indicate that addition of 500 ppm of an alcohol ethoxyglycerylsulfonate increased volumetric sweep efficiency substantially over that obtained in a WAG process (156). 

Gravity override of low density steam leads to poor volumetric sweep efficiency and low oil recovery in steam floods. Nonchemical methods of improving steam volumetric sweep efficiency include completing the injection well so steam is only injected in the lower part of the oil-bearing zone (181), alternating the injection of water and steam (182), and horizontal steam injection wells (183,184). Surfactants frequently are used as steam mobihty control agents to reduce gravity override (185). Field-proven surfactants include alpha-olefin sulfonates (AOS), alkyltoluene sulfonates, and neutralized... 

Surfactants evaluated in surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding include internal olefin sulfonates (259,261), linear alkyl xylene sulfonates (262), petroleum sulfonates (262), alcohol ethoxysulfates (258,261,263), and alcohol ethoxylates/anionic surfactants (257). Water-thickening polymers, either xanthan or polyacrylamide, can reduce injected fluid mobiHty in alkaline flooding (264) and surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding (259,263). The combined use of alkah, surfactant, and water-thickening polymer has been termed the alkaH—surfactant—polymer (ASP) process. Cross-linked polymers have been used to increase volumetric sweep efficiency of surfactant—polymer—alkaline agent formulations (265). 

Microbial-enhanced oil recovery involves injection of carefully chosen microbes. Subsequent injection of a nutrient is sometimes employed to promote bacterial growth. Molasses is the nutrient of choice owing to its low (ca 100/t) cost. The main nutrient source for the microbes is often the cmde oil in the reservoir. A rapidly growing microbe population can reduce the permeabiHty of thief zones improving volumetric sweep efficiency. Microbes, particularly species of Clostridium and Bacillus, have also been used to produce surfactants, alcohols, solvents, and gases in situ (270). These chemicals improve waterflood oil displacement efficiency (see also Bioremediation (Supplement)). 

Thermally stable foam additives, such as alkylaryl sulfonates and C -C g alpha-olefin sulfonates, are being used in EOR steam flooding for heavy od production. The foam is used to increase reservoir sweep efficiency (178,179). Foaming agents are under evaluation in chemical CO2 EOR flooding to reduce CO2 channeling and thus increase sweep efficiency (180). 

One more variation to the many methods proposed for sulfur extraction is the fire-flood method. It is a modem version of the Sickian method, by which a portion of the sulfur is burned to melt the remainder. It would be done in situ and is said to offer cost advantages, to work in almost any type of zone formation, and to produce better sweep efficiency than other systems. The recovery stream would be about 20 wt % sulfur as SO2 and 80 wt % elemental sulfur. The method was laboratory-tested in the late 1960s and patents were issued. However, it was not commercially exploited because sulfur prices dropped. 

Earlier Kern River pilot results [59,82,83] showed that a steam foam formulation based on AOS containing 16-18 carbon atoms in the hydrophobe improves sweep efficiency and oil recovery of the steam drive but propagates relatively slowly and leaves the same residual oil saturation (ROS) as steam. 

The polymer in a polymer waterflooding process acts primarily as a thickener. It decreases the permeability of the reservoir and thus improves the vertical and lateral sweep efficiency. 

Once the precipitate is formed in the larger pores, the subsequent fluid flow will be diverted to relatively smaller pores, thereby increasing the sweep efficiency. Additional experimental work with a series of connected cores suggested that the permeability profile can be successfully modified. However, pH control plays a critical role in the propagation of the chemical precipitation reaction [48]. 

Silicate gel enhances the sweep efficiency of a waterflood, gasflood, or steamflood operation by reducing the permeability of the high-permeability zones. Weak acids may be added to control gel generation rate [377]. 

T. Zhu, A. Strycker, C. J. Raible, and K. Vineyard. Foams for mobility control and improved sweep efficiency in gas flooding. In Proceedings Volume, volume 2, pages 277-286.11th SPE/DOE Impr Oil Recovery Symp (Tulsa, OK, 4/19-4/22), 1998. 

The amount of oil recovery promoted by an injected fluid is related to its ability to displace the oil it contacts in the reservoir, termed the oil displacement efficiency (ODE), and to the relative amount of the reservoir invaded by the injected fluid, termed the volumetric sweep efficiency (VSE). Total oil recovery may be expressed as ... 

Volumetric sweep efficiency is determined by the permeability and wettability distribution in the reservoir and by the properties of injected fluids. Waterflooding characteristically exhibits poor volumetric sweep efficiency. The more expensive the injection fluid, the more important it is to have a high volumetric sweep efficiency so that the injected fluid contacts and thus mobilizes a larger volume of oil. High permeability streaks or layers (thief zones) and natural or induced rock fractures can channel the injected fluid through a small portion of the reservoir resulting in a low volumetric sweep efficiency. 

The displacing fluid may be steam, supercritical carbon dioxide, hydrocarbon miscible gases, nitrogen or solutions of surfactants or polymers instead of water. The VSE increases with lower mobility ratio values (253). A mobility ratio of 1.0 is considered optimum. The mobility of water is usually high relative to that of oil. Steam and oil-miscible gases such as supercritical carbon dioxide also exhibit even higher mobility ratios and consequent low volumetric sweep efficiencies. 

Gravity override is the migration of the steam to the upper portion of the formation and is caused by the low steam density. This results in channeling of the steam through the upper portion of the reservoir and a low volumetric sweep efficiency. 

Surfactants have been used as steam mobility control agents in both laboratory and field tests to prevent this gravity override thereby increasing volumetric sweep efficiency. Surfactants that have been... 

Both nonionic and anionic surfactants have been evaluated in this application (488,489) including internal olefin sulfonates (487, 490), linear alkylxylene sulfonates (490), petroleum sulfonates (491), alcohol ethoxysulfates (487,489,492). Ethoxylated alcohols have been added to some anionic surfactant formulations to improve interfacial properties (486). The use of water thickening polymers, either xanthan or polyacrylamide to reduce injected fluid mobility mobility has been proposed for both alkaline flooding (493) and surfactant enhanced alkaline flooding (492). Crosslinked polymers have been used to increase volumetric sweep efficiency of surfactant - polymer - alkaline agent formulations (493). 

---