Styrene surfactant

Polymerisable styrenic surfactants (surfmers) and non-reactive analogues were applied in emulsion copolymerisation of acrylic monomers in a seeded semi-... 

Emulsification is the process by which a hydrophobic monomer, such as styrene, is dispersed into micelles and monomer droplets. A measure of a surfactant s abiUty to solubilize a monomer is its critical micelle concentration (CMC). Below the CMC the surfactant is dissolved ia the aqueous phase and does not serve to solubilize monomer. At and above the CMC the surfactant forms spherical micelles, usually 50 to 200 soap molecules per micelle. Many... 

An a priori method for choosing a surfactant was attempted by several researchers (50) using the hydroph i1 e—1 ip oph i1 e balance or HLB system (51). In the HLB system a surfactant soluble in oil has a value of 1 and a surfactant soluble in water has a value of 20. Optimum HLB values have been reported for latices made from styrene, vinyl acetate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate, acrylonitrile, and their copolymers and range from 11 to 18. The HLB system has been criticized as being imprecise (52). 

Polyall lene Oxide Block Copolymers. The higher alkylene oxides derived from propjiene, butylene, styrene (qv), and cyclohexene react with active oxygens in a manner analogous to the reaction of ethylene oxide. Because the hydrophilic oxygen constitutes a smaller proportion of these molecules, the net effect is that the oxides, unlike ethylene oxide, are hydrophobic. The higher oxides are not used commercially as surfactant raw materials except for minor quantities that are employed as chain terminators in polyoxyethylene surfactants to lower the foaming tendency. The hydrophobic nature of propylene oxide units, —CH(CH2)CH20—, has been utilized in several ways in the manufacture of surfactants. Manufacture, properties, and uses of poly(oxyethylene- (9-oxypropylene) have been reviewed (98). 

Mechanisms. Because of its considerable industrial importance as well as its intrinsic interest, emulsion polymerization of vinyl acetate in the presence of surfactants has been extensively studied (75—77). The Smith-Ewart theory, which describes emulsion polymerization of monomers such as styrene, does not apply to vinyl acetate. Reasons for this are the substantial water solubiUty of vinyl acetate monomer, and the different reactivities of the vinyl acetate and styrene radicals the chain transfer to monomer is much higher for vinyl acetate. The kinetics of the polymerization of vinyl acetate has been studied and mechanisms have been proposed (78—82). 

Cationic, anionic, and amphoteric surfactants derive thek water solubiUty from thek ionic charge, whereas the nonionic hydrophile derives its water solubihty from highly polar terminal hydroxyl groups. Cationic surfactants perform well in polar substrates like styrenics and polyurethane. Examples of cationic surfactants ate quaternary ammonium chlorides, quaternary ammonium methosulfates, and quaternary ammonium nitrates (see QuARTERNARY AMMONIUM compounds). Anionic surfactants work well in PVC and styrenics. Examples of anionic surfactants ate fatty phosphate esters and alkyl sulfonates. 

Heat-stable, nonvolatile surfactants faciUtate processing. Resins with surfactant properties, such as styrene maleic anhydride resins, have sometimes been employed (95). 

Suspension polymerization produces beads of plastic for styrene, methyl methacrviaie. viny l chloride, and vinyl acetate production. The monomer, in which the catalyst must be soluble, is maintained in droplet fonn suspended in water by agitation in the presence of a stabilizer such as gelatin each droplet of monomer undergoes bulk polymerization. In emulsion polymerization, ihe monomer is dispersed in water by means of a surfactant to form tiny particles held in suspension I micellcsK The monomer enters the hydrocarbon part of the micelles for polymerization by a... 

The preparation of the organic phase is done in a second flask by mixing the toluene, nonsolvent (dodecane, etc.), DVB, styrene or any other monomer, surfactant, and azobis. Mix at 120 rpm under a nitrogen blanket and bring the solution to 40°C. 

Alcohol sulfates and alcohol ether sulfates separated by HPLC on a styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer column with 4 1 (v/v) methanol and 0.05 M ammonium acetate aqueous solution as the mobile phase were analyzed by simultaneous inductively coupled argon plasma vacuum emission spectroscopy (IPC), monitoring the 180.7-nm sulfur line as a sulfur-specific detector [294]. This method was applied to the analysis of these surfactants in untreated wastewaters. 

A mixture of monolauryl phosphate sodium salt and triethylamine in H20 was treated with glycidol at 80°C for 8 h to give 98% lauryl 2,3-dihydro-xypropyl phosphate sodium salt [304]. Dyeing aids for polyester fibers exist of triethanolamine salts of ethoxylated phenol-styrene adduct phosphate esters [294], Fatty ethanolamide phosphate surfactant are obtained from the reaction of fatty alcohols and fatty ethanolamides with phosphorus pentoxide and neutralization of the product [295]. A double bond in the alkyl group of phosphoric acid esters alter the properties of the molecule. Diethylethanolamine salt of oleyl phosphate is effectively used as a dispersant for antimony oxide in a mixture of xylene-type solvent and water. The composition is useful as an additive for preventing functional deterioration of fluid catalytic cracking catalysts for heavy petroleum fractions. When it was allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 month it shows almost no precipitation [241]. 

This paper presents the physical mechanism and the structure of a comprehensive dynamic Emulsion Polymerization Model (EPM). EPM combines the theory of coagulative nucleation of homogeneously nucleated precursors with detailed species material and energy balances to calculate the time evolution of the concentration, size, and colloidal characteristics of latex particles, the monomer conversions, the copolymer composition, and molecular weight in an emulsion system. The capabilities of EPM are demonstrated by comparisons of its predictions with experimental data from the literature covering styrene and styrene/methyl methacrylate polymerizations. EPM can successfully simulate continuous and batch reactors over a wide range of initiator and added surfactant concentrations. 

Goodwin et al. (Z2.), Figures 2 and 3, styrene homopolymerization in a batch reactor at 70°C with no added surfactant. 

Sutterlin 22.), Figures 4,5, and 6, styrene and methyl methacrylate (MMA) homopolymerizations in a batch reactor at 80 °C with various amounts of added surfactant. 

Badder and Brooks (2A), Figure 7, styrene homopolymerization in a CSTR at 50 °C with added surfactant. 

Prindle and Ray (ZB.) have recently analyzed the same styrene data using a hybrid model consisting of the micellar nucleation mechanism above the CMC and of the homogeneous nucleation and coagulation mechanism below the CMC. Their simulations show a much steeper rise in the particle number concentration precisely at the CMC than predicted by EPM. Their hybrid model does not appear to predict that the particle concentration levels off at high surfactant concentrations. 

As an even more explicit example of this effect Figure 6 shows that EPM is able to reproduce fairly well the experimentally observed dependence of the particle number on surfactant concentration for a different monomer, namely methyl methacrylate (MMA). The polymerization was carried at 80°C at a fixed concentration of ammonium persulfate initiator (0.00635 mol dm 3). Because methyl methacrylate is much more water soluble than styrene, the drop off in particle number is not as steep around the critical micelle concentration (22.) In this instance the experimental data do show a leveling off of the particle number at high and low surfactant concentrations as expected from the theory of particle formation by coagulative nucleation of precursor particles formed by homogeneous nucleation, which has been incorporated into EPM. 

The process of adsorption of polyelectrolytes on solid surfaces has been intensively studied because of its importance in technology, including steric stabilization of colloid particles [3,4]. This process has attracted increasing attention because of the recently developed, sophisticated use of polyelectrolyte adsorption alternate layer-by-layer adsorption [7] and stabilization of surfactant monolayers at the air-water interface [26], Surface forces measurement has been performed to study the adsorption process of a negatively charged polymer, poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS), on a cationic monolayer of fluorocarbon ammonium amphiphilic 1 (Fig. 7) [27],... 

Moreover, stable liquid systems made up of nanoparticles coated with a surfactant monolayer and dispersed in an apolar medium could be employed to catalyze reactions involving both apolar substrates (solubilized in the bulk solvent) and polar and amphiphilic substrates (preferentially encapsulated within the reversed micelles or located at the surfactant palisade layer) or could be used as antiwear additives for lubricants. For example, monodisperse nickel boride catalysts were prepared in water/CTAB/hexanol microemulsions and used directly as the catalysts of styrene hydrogenation [215]. 

Vaterite is thermodynamically most unstable in the three crystal structures. Vaterite, however, is expected to be used in various purposes, because it has some features such as high specific surface area, high solubility, high dispersion, and small specific gravity compared with the other two crystal systems. Spherical vaterite crystals have already been reported in the presence of divalent cations [33], a surfactant [bis(2-ethylhexyl)sodium sulfate (AOT)] [32], poly(styrene-sulfonate) [34], poly(vinylalcohol) [13], and double-hydrophilic block copolymers [31]. The control of the particle size of spherical vaterite should be important for application as pigments, fillers and dentifrice. 

An extraordinary way of stabilizing RUO2-coated CdS colloids for H2 generation was chosen by Fendler and co-workers The colloidal particles were generated in situ in surfactant vesicles of dioctadecyldimethylammonium chloride and dihexa-decyl phosphate. Thiophenol as a membrane permeable electron donor acted as a sacrificial additive. Later, a surface active re-usable electron donor (n-C,gH3,)2N — (CHj)—CH2—CHj—SH, Br was incorporated into the vesicles. Its R—SS—R oxidation product could be chemically reduced by NaBH to regenerate the active electron donor. The H2 yields in these systems were only 0.5 %. However, yields up to 10% were later reported for a system in which CdS was incorporated into a polymerizable styrene moiety, (n-C,jH3jC02(CH2)2) N (CH3) (CH2CgH4CH=CH2>, CP, and benzyl alcohol was used as the electron donor. 

Gilsonite is active as a fluid loss additive because the permeability of cement is reduced. Latex additives also act as fluid loss additives. They also act as bonding aids, gas migration preventers, and matrix intensifiers. They improve the elasticity of the cement and the resistance to corrosive fluids [921]. A styrene-butadiene latex in combination with nonionic and anionic surfactants shows less fluid loss. The styrene-butadiene latex is added in an amount up to 30% by weight of the dry cement. The ratio of styrene to butadiene in the latex is typically 2 1. In addition, a nonionic surfactant (octylphenol ethoxylate and polyethylene oxide) or an anionic surfactant, a copolymer of maleic anhydride, and 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate [719] can be added in amounts up to 2%. 

---