Structure-property predictions

Baughman, R.H. Eckhardt, H. Kertesz, M. Structure-property predictions for new planar forms of carbon. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 6687-6699. 

Table 8.13 shows MCE g, MCE g and MCEfg for the models with n = 13 descriptors for all 77 structural properties. In Figure 8.32, MCE-j g of classification trees with mindev = 0.04 are plotted vs. MCE-j-g of linear models with n = 13 descriptors. Data points above the diagonal indicate structural properties predicted better by linear models than by classification trees. The advantage of the linear method is obvious. In addition, the name of a structural property is given for each property particularly well predicted MCEj-g <0.15) or particularly poorly predicted MCEj-g > 0.35). 

Figure 6.1 Zwitterionic character of ciprofloxacin. Depending on pH, different chemical species are present. (Calculator Plugins were used for structure property prediction and calculation, Marvin 4.1.1, 2006, ChemAxon (http //www.chemaxon.com), reproduced from ref. 6 with kind permission of Springer.)...

Computational solid-state physics and chemistry are vibrant areas of research. The all-electron methods for high-accuracy electronic stnicture calculations mentioned in section B3.2.3.2 are in active development, and with PAW, an efficient new all-electron method has recently been introduced. Ever more powerfiil computers enable more detailed predictions on systems of increasing size. At the same time, new, more complex materials require methods that are able to describe their large unit cells and diverse atomic make-up. Here, the new orbital-free DFT method may lead the way. More powerful teclmiques are also necessary for the accurate treatment of surfaces and their interaction with atoms and, possibly complex, molecules. Combined with recent progress in embedding theory, these developments make possible increasingly sophisticated predictions of the quantum structural properties of solids and solid surfaces. 

The JME Editor is a Java program which allows one to draw, edit, and display molecules and reactions directly within a web page and may also be used as an application in a stand-alone mode. The editor was originally developed for use in an in-house web-based chemoinformatics system but because of many requests it was released to the public. The JME currently is probably the most popular molecule entry system written in Java. Internet sites that use the JME applet include several structure databases, property prediction services, various chemoinformatics tools (such as for generation of 3D structures or molecular orbital visualization), and interactive sites focused on chemistry education [209]. 

Direct property prediction is a standard technique in drug discovery. "Reverse property prediction can be exemplified with chromatography application databases that contain separations, including method details and assigned chemical structures for each chromatogram. Retrieving compounds present in the database that are similar to the query allows the retrieval of suitable separation conditions for use with the query (method selection). 

A challenging task in material science as well as in pharmaceutical research is to custom tailor a compound s properties. George S. Hammond stated that the most fundamental and lasting objective of synthesis is not production of new compounds, but production of properties (Norris Award Lecture, 1968). The molecular structure of an organic or inorganic compound determines its properties. Nevertheless, methods for the direct prediction of a compound s properties based on its molecular structure are usually not available (Figure 8-1). Therefore, the establishment of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships (QSPRs) and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs) uses an indirect approach in order to tackle this problem. In the first step, numerical descriptors encoding information about the molecular structure are calculated for a set of compounds. Secondly, statistical and artificial neural network models are used to predict the property or activity of interest based on these descriptors or a suitable subset. 

Two approaches to quantify/fQ, i.e., to establish a quantitative relationship between the structural features of a compoimd and its properties, are described in this section quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) and linear free energy relationships (LFER) cf. Section 3.4.2.2). The LFER approach is important for historical reasons because it contributed the first attempt to predict the property of a compound from an analysis of its structure. LFERs can be established only for congeneric series of compounds, i.e., sets of compounds that share the same skeleton and only have variations in the substituents attached to this skeleton. As examples of a QSPR approach, currently available methods for the prediction of the octanol/water partition coefficient, log P, and of aqueous solubility, log S, of organic compoimds are described in Section 10.1.4 and Section 10.15, respectively. 

An example of using one predicted property to predict another is predicting the adsorption of chemicals in soil. This is usually done by first predicting an octanol water partition coelficient and then using an equation that relates this to soil adsorption. This type of property-property relationship is most reliable for monofunctional compounds. Structure-property relationships, and to a lesser extent group additivity methods, are more reliable for multifunctional compounds than this type of relationship. 

When structure-property relationships are mentioned in the current literature, it usually implies a quantitative mathematical relationship. Such relationships are most often derived by using curve-fitting software to find the linear combination of molecular properties that best predicts the property for a set of known compounds. This prediction equation can be used for either the interpolation or extrapolation of test set results. Interpolation is usually more accurate than extrapolation. 

Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships. A useful way to predict physical property data has become available, based only on a knowledge of molecular stmcture, that seems to work well for pyridine compounds. Such a prediction can be used to estimate real physical properties of pyridines without having to synthesize and purify the substance, and then measure the physical property. 

Structure—Property Relationships The modem approach to the development of new elastomers is to satisfy specific appHcation requirements. AcryUc elastomers are very powerhil in this respect, because they can be tailor-made to meet certain performance requirements. Even though the stmcture—property studies are proprietary knowledge of each acryUc elastomer manufacturer, some significant information can be found in the Hterature (18,41). Figure 3a shows the predicted according to GCT, and the volume swell in reference duid, ASTM No. 3 oil (42), related to each monomer composition. Figure 3b shows thermal aging resistance of acryHc elastomers as a function of backbone monomer composition. 

The premise that discontinuous short fibers such as floating catalyst VGCF can provide structural reinforcements can be supported by theoretical models developed for the structural properties of paper Cox [36]. This work was recently extended by Baxter to include general fiber architecture [37]. This work predicts that modulus of a composite, E can be determined from the fiber and matrix moduli, Ef and E, respectively, and the fiber volume fraction, Vf, by a variation of the rule of mixtures,... 

Applications of neural networks are becoming more diverse in chemistry [31-40]. Some typical applications include predicting chemical reactivity, acid strength in oxides, protein structure determination, quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR), fluid property relationships, classification of molecular spectra, group contribution, spectroscopy analysis, etc. The results reported in these areas are very encouraging and are demonstrative of the wide spectrum of applications and interest in this area. 

The state of research on the two classes of acetylenic compounds described in this article, the cyclo[ ]carbons and tetraethynylethene derivatives, differs drastically. The synthesis of bulk quantities of a cyclocarbon remains a fascinating challenge in view of the expected instability of these compounds. These compounds would represent a fourth allotropic form of carbon, in addition to diamond, graphite, and the fullerenes. The full spectral characterization of macroscopic quantities of cyclo-C should provide a unique experimental calibration for the power of theoretical predictions dealing with the electronic and structural properties of conjugated n-chromophores of substantial size and number of heavy atoms. We believe that access to bulk cyclocarbon quantities will eventually be accomplished by controlled thermal or photochemical cycloreversion reactions of structurally defined, stable precursor molecules similar to those described in this review. 

---