Spray analysis test

The conditions for the Spray Analysis Test were set with a spraying time (t) = 10 seconds, an air pressure of 30 psig and a distance (x) at 38 cm. The solutions were pumped to the nozzle at a rate of 32 ml/min by means of a Sage model 355 syringe pump using a 50 cc syringe. 

Development of a Spray Analysis Test for Measuring Mist Reduction... 

Figure 2. Spray Analysis test on PPlymeis (0.5% aqueous solutions)...

Correlation Between the Spray Analysis Test and Grinder Antimist Performance... 

The amount of aerosol mist was established for the baseline semisynthetic emulsion and was assigned the value of 0% mist reduction. Additizing this fluid with 1000 ppm of the 1 million MW PEO resulted initially in a 70% reduction in mist (Figure 4) however, after 0.5 hr of machining the mist level increased by 10% over the baseline fluid. Additional machining for 1.0 hr resulted in further degradation of the polymer and an increase in mist of 20% over the baseline. The spray analysis test predicted <6% mist reduction. 

The semisynthetic metalworidng fluid was additized with 1000 ppm of Polymer B. The additized solution provided 45% mist reduction upon the initial addition of the polymer (Figure 4) and after 1.5 hr of machining there was >35% mist reduction. This result correlates with the spray analysis test which predicted 22% mist reduction... 

As with the studies on the herbicide spray equipment testing grids at Eglln AFB, Florida, the studies of the biodegradation plots confirmed the presence and persistence of TCDD. Analysis of soil samples collected from the Utah plots in 1978 indicated that 85 percent of the amount of TCDD originally extracted In 1972 could be recovered, suggesting that TCDD applied subsurface was minimally disappearing. 

Using the spray pattern analysis test, the amount of aerosol mist reduction, ADGeducUon) Obtained for an aqueous solution containing 5000 ppm of a 1 million MW PEO polymer was calculated to be 20%, Figure 2. Similarly, the amount of aerosol mist reduction, AD(reduction) obtained for an aqueous solution containing 5000 ppm of a 2 million MW PEO polymer was calculated to be 40%. 

A grinder test was developed to correlate the mist reduction observed in the spray pattern analysis test with an actual metalworking operation. Both a semisynthetic which contains 10% emulsified oil and a synthetic metalworking fluid which contains no mineral oil, were used during the machining of steel bar stocks. 

Juice factories frequently employ field persons to advise growers on the appHcation of sprays to the growing crops so that residues on harvested fmit are within prescribed limits. They also may sample the crop before harvest for analysis, and coordinate harvesting with factory production schedules. Payment for raw materials is frequently based on specifications that are either official government grades or stated market standards. Official graders may be employed to test each load. 

Analyses for the Saxitoxins. Early methods for analysis of the saxitoxins evolved from those used for toxin isolation and purification. The principal landmarks in the development of preparative separation techniques for the saxitoxins were 1) the employment of carboxylate cation exchange resins by Schantz et al. (82) 2) the use of the polyacrylamide gel Bio-Gel P2 by Buckley and by Shimizu (5,78) and 3) the development by Buckley of an effective TLC system, including a new solvent mixture and a new visualization technique (83). The solvent mixture, designated by Buckley as "E", remains the best for general resolution of the saxitoxins. The visualization method, oxidation of the saxitoxins on silica gel TLC plates to fluorescent degradation products with hydrogen peroxide and heat, is an adaptation of the Bates and Rapoport fluorescence assay for saxitoxin in solution. Curiously, while peroxide oxidation in solution provides little or no response for the N-l-hydroxy saxitoxins, peroxide spray on TLC plates is a sensitive test for all saxitoxin derivatives with the C-12 gemdiol intact. 

Application of the test substance to the test system is without doubt the most critical step of the residue field trial. Under-application may be corrected, if possible and if approved by the Study Director, by making a follow-up application if the error becomes known shortly after the application has been made. Over-application errors can usually only be corrected by starting the trial again. The Study Director must be contacted as soon as an error of this nature is detected. Immediate communication allows for the most feasible options to be considered in resolving the error. If application errors are not detected at the time of the application, the samples from such a trial can easily become the source of undesirable variability when the final analysis results are known. Because the application is critical, the PI must calculate and verify the data that will constitute the application information for the trial. If the test substance weight, the spray volume, the delivery rate, the size of the plot, and the travel speed for the application are carefully determined and then validated prior to the application, problems will seldom arise. With the advent of new tools such as computers and hand-held calculators, the errors traditionally associated with applications to small plot trials should be minimized in the future. The following paragraphs outline some of the important considerations for each of the phases of the application. 

A sample of hops which had been treated with tetraethyl pyrophosphate showed a negative chemical analysis. The plant material was also extracted and the extract added to the drinking water of test animals and sensitive insects. The animals and insects that drank this treated water for several days showed no reaction. With the sensitive insects it would have been possible to detect even a few parts per million. In addition, there have been extensive commercial field applications of the chemical in dust and spray form to crops such as apples, pears, grapes, celery, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and others up to within a few days of harvest there has been no detectable poison residue on any of the crops. The lack of poison residue with use of tetraethyl pyrophosphate is due to the fact that it hydrolyzes within a few hours of application, breaking down into transient nonresidual and nonpoisonous chemicals. Thus it is possible to use tetraethyl pyrophosphate well up to harvest time of food products without danger of residual poison on crops. The fact that the chemical is used in extremely small amounts is a definite advantage in respect to freedom from poison residue. 

It appears that the greatest value of the Schechter-Haller method applied to the determination of methoxychlor is in the analysis of materials whose previous spray history is unknown. The production of a red color in such analysis indicates the possibility of the existence of methoxychlor, and warrants a further specific test. 

Simplicity and reliability of operation make AC impedance measurements attractive as a technique in the evaluation of coating integrity. As opposed to classical salt spray test, analysis times are shorter with the AC impedance technique and quantitative data are obtained permitting relevant mechanistic Information to be derived. Impedance test methods are likely to find many applications in the resolution of unsolved practical problems ( .) ... 

Another test that may be considered is charring at 150 °C after a spray of 5% sulfuric acid in ethanol. Of all tests, it is the most dramatic in that it will not allow any further analysis. Charring will leave dark spots for all organic materials on glass, aluminum, and polyester plates/sheets. Higher temperatures will melt the polyester sheets. 

Mortalities observed in tests of a series of oil dosages against adult female California red scale or eggs of the citrus red mite indicated a positive relation between increased dosage and increased kill. The fit of the points to the line was much better for oil dosages expressed as deposit than for those expressed as spray concentration. However, the variance observed indicated that statistical procedures would be required to arrive at the best fit for a line through the observed points. The method of probit analysis chosen was that proposed by Bliss (2) and modified by Finney (11) for data adjusted for mortality in the controls. 

Sensory Analysis. A paired comparison test was run to determine if the difference in oil droplet size in the emulsion changed the perceived intensity of the orange flavor. The coarsest emulsion (3.87 pM) and the Microfluidized sample (0.90 pM) from the third set of spray dried samples were compared. The solutions were prepared using 200 ppm flavor in a 10% (w/v) sucrose solution with 0.30% of a 50% citric acid solution added. The amount of each powder required to attain 200 ppm orange oil was calculated on the basis of percent oil in each powder (determined by Clevenger analysis). A pair of samples at approximately 10 C was given to each of 24 untrained panelists. The samples were coded with random numbers. Half the panelists were asked to taste the coarsest sample first while while the other half tasted the Microfluidized sample first. This was done to determine whether or not adaptation was a factor. The panelists were asked to indicate which sample had the most intense orange flavor. 

The deposit of active chemical, the drift losses and drop size range can be found and would be functions of the spray formulations and application equipment which are under test In a given weather and application terrain. In order to compare different test run data, the results may be plotted as a series of 2nd degree polynomial regression curves (6). Actual chemical analysis of the released spray caught on the samplers provides the most accurate measure of deposit and airborne losses, but calculation of these functions from the drop sizes found can also be done. A total deposit recovery as a % of the amount released can be determined. 

---