Software development life cycle

Despite its weaknesses (such as described in the 1975 collection of essays The Mythical Man Month [11]), the traditional software development life cycle (collect requirements, design, implement, test, deploy, maintain) has remained the standard framework for software development. However, in recent years it has become clear that the life cycle is not well suited to applications that are experimental in nature (i.e., where there is no precedent for the particular kind of application) or that exist in rapidly changing environments. This has led to the development of agile methodologies (also known as lightweight... 

Guidances recommend an integration of software life-cycle management and risk management activities. Software validation and verification activities must be conducted throughout the software life cycle [12,14]. Software verification and validation are terms frequently confused. Software verification is defined as the process that provides objective evidence that the design outputs of a particular phase of the software development life cycle meet all of the specified requirements for that phase... 

Test and calibration Quality procedures Software development life cycle Documentation requirements Training O M manuals... 

Standards for work conducted, including the software development life cycle to be used, and the documents to be delivered by it... 

Management of software development personnel Formal software development life cycle and associated documentation Programming standards Software fault management Documentation management Configuration control User manuals Release notes User support... 

Is a written software development life-cycle methodology in use ... 

Although it is no longer common practice to implement bespoke/custom software solutions when implementing LIMS, it may be necessary for software modules to be developed or modified to meet a specific business need. In such cases the new or modified module should be developed in accordance with a software development life cycle. 

As part of the software development life cycle of the custom/bespoke or modified software, it should be subject to SCR. This is another means of building quality into LIMS. When conducting an SCR, the source code should be reviewed against the agreed design and Good Programming Practice (GPP). Particular emphasis should be applied to the software deemed as GxP critical. 

The underlying code of the generic shell that comprises the tool should be developed according to the software development life cycle. Depending on the degree of sophistication of the system, testing should cover the following areas of functionality ... 

A configuration management plan shonld be established to outline the process to be followed to ensure that configuration and version control is established for the software, development tools, and supporting docnmentation that are nsed. This will enable accurate configuration baselines to be taken at specified points in the software development life cycle. 

Establish and document the standards to be used for all Web site development following the same approach used for other coding standards within the software development life cycle. 

Computer Aided Software Environments (CASE) Tools designed to support the analysis and design phases of the software development life cycle. The tools are usually oriented toward the support of graphical notations. [Defined for this book.]... 

It is useful to understand the steps of the software development life cycle (SDLC) during a project. In fact, this approach is commonly used for implementation and validation even when commercial off-the-shelf software is involved [104]. It is also important to consider the economic aspects of the automation project [105]. A 10-step guide to success that emphasizes clearly defined project control in outsourced automation/information technology projects has been published [106]. 

IT005 Software development life cycle practices and procedures... 

The aforementioned procedure covers an entire lifetime of software, which is usually referred to as the software development life cycle (SDLC). In particular, commercial software development underlies certain regulations that are compiled as a set of standards. Several models can be applied to form a formal point of view. One of these is the V-model its name is derived from the shape of the graphical representation used to describe the required processes (Figure 8.1). 

Specification in a software development life cycle is the task of precisely describing the software to be written. 

SAP had already started to develop a Quality Management System (QMS) according to ISO 9001. The expectation was that having an ISO 9001 certificate would also fulfill GMP. The audit report stated that SAP was on the right way, but that there were some gaps in the defined software development life cycle. ISO 9001 is a basic requirement but not sufficient for GMP. 

For each phase, design documents of safety systems, based on SRP BTP-14, of the software development life cycle, include software plans, software requirement specification, software design output, source code listing, and test reports. These documents are subject to the IV V review. 

Software development life cycle (SDLC) The sequence of generic activities needed for software to be created according to a particular development method. 

The need to map the phases of particular software development life cycles onto the stages of a managed project. 

In addition to the need for calibration to deal with local circumstances, a problem with the COCOMO-type approach is that the number of lines of code that an application will require will be difficult to assess at the beginning of the software development life cycle and will only be known with certainty when the software has actually been coded. Lines of code are also difficult for the user community to grasp and thus validate. 

Figure 1 gives a graphical view of the waterfall software development life cycle that provides a visual explanation of the term waterfall. Each phase yields results that flow into the next, and the process ideally proceeds in an orderly and linear fashion. 

The AOP 52 suggests in chapter 2.3.4 a hardware and software development life cycle and also suggests the integration of both of them. 

A key concept of the lEC 61508 as mentioned before is the implementation of a safety lifecycle that includes hardware and software development life cycles for the safety functions. The AOP 52 recommends the usage of a lifecycle during development of hardware and software. One can say that there is a basic correspondence between the key concept of using process models for the development of safety critical systems. 

---