Self-evaluation products

There is no single particular self-evaluation product covering all aspects of inclusion evaluation, and schools will need to use a variety of appropriate tools to assess the impact on inclusion and how well they are serving different groups of pupils. Existing products/tools can be grouped into two key types ... 

Employees can also be their own coaches by obtaining feedback from other sources. Reviewing their own work products, data from reports, or even videotapes (when appropriate and if available) can provide employees with opportunities for self-evaluation and improvement. 

It is easier to write about a culture that includes safety as a core value than it is to factually describe a situation in which the culture deteriorates over time, the effect the deterioration has on increasing risk and the position in which such deterioration places a safety professional. The following are excerpts taken from a report that was internally produced by BP Products North America (2005) pertaining to a fire and explosion that occurred on March 23,2005, at an owned and operated refinery in Texas City, Texas. As a result of that incident, 15 people were killed and over 170 were harmed. It is important to note that these excerpts, taken from the Executive Summary— Fatal Accident Investigation Report, represent a self-evaluation. 

PG is also used to prevent slow deterioration of cosmetics and personal care products caused by chemical reactions with oxygen, inhibiting the formation or accumulation of free radicals that may cause the deterioration of the product. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel evaluated the scientific data and concluded that PG was safe in the practices of use in cosmetics and personal care products at concentrations less than or equal to 0.1% [5]. It is used in many product categories, including lipsticks, bath products, skin cleansing products, moisturizers, skin care products, makeup products, self-tanning products, and sunscreen and suntan products. 

Several studies have evaluated dietary supplements such as isoflavones, which are found in soy products and red clover. A well-controlled trial in more than 400 postmenopausal women evaluating a specific isoflavone, ipriflavone, found no benefits on bone mineral density or fracture rates after 3 years.47 Nevertheless, because these therapies are available without prescription and are not regulated by the FDA, patients may choose to self-medicate with isoflavones. Lymphocytopenia appeared in several patients treated with ipriflavone in clinical trials. Additionally, ipriflavone should be used with caution in immunocompromised patients or those with renal disease. It may inhibit CYP1A2 and CYP2C9 and may interact with drugs metabolized by those pathways, such as warfarin. 

Explanations and details of these terms can be obtained in various books and pamphlets, for instance, Allen (1980) and Liversey (1983). No one parameter is self-sufficient, and alone gives a complete view of the financial status of a project or product. Therefore a number of parameters are usually calculated, and used in conjunction. They serve to give indications of how to minimise the period over which capital needs to be committed to a specific project, to show changes in the cost-structure of the process with time, and to reduce the time taken to convert the material, labour and overhead resources (the working capital) into cash in the form of profits from sales. That is, to make the cash-flow as favourable as possible. Each comparer will have different criteria as to what constitutes an acceptable financial risk when evaluating a project. Obviously healthcare product/pharmaceutical companies have quite different criteria to companies manufacturing bulk chemicals. 

This unit defines three different tests that are used to evaluate lipid systems. The first two, i.e., iodine value (IV see Basic Protocol I) and saponification value (SV see Basic Protocol 2), are used to determine the level of unsaturation and the relative size (chain length) of the fatty acids in the system, respectively. The free fatty acid (FFA) analysis (see Basic Protocol 3) is self-explanatory. Each of these analyses provides a specific set of information about the lipid system. The IV and SV provide relative information this means that the data obtained are compared to the same data from other, defined lipid systems. In mixed triacylglyceride systems there is no absolute IV that indicates the exact number of double bonds or SV that indicates the exact chain length. The data from the FFA analysis is an absolute value however, the meaning of the value is not absolute. As a quality indicator, ranges of FFA content are used and the amount that can be tolerated is product and/or process dependent. 

---