Partial safety factors

It is very clear from the complexity of the situations described in the case studies of the last two chapters, that simple factors of safety, load factors, partial factors or even notional probabilities of failure can cover only a small part of a total description of the safety of a structure. In this chapter we will try to draw some general conclusions from the incidents described as well as others not discussed in any detail in this book. The conclusions will be based upon the general classification of types of failure presented in Section 7.2. Subjective assessments of the truth and importance of the checklist of parameter statements within that classification are analysed using a simple numerical scale and also using fuzzy set theory. This leads us on to a tentative method for the analysis of the safety of a structure yet to be built. The method,however, has several disadvantages which can be overcome by the use of a model based on fuzzy logic. At the end of the chapte(, the discussion of the various possible measures of uncertainty is completed. 

The flow relationships are concerned with two or more units or items. For example, the flow between two units may involve air, water, steam, lubricating oil, fuel, or electrical energy. In addition, the flow could be unconfined, such as heat radiation from one body (unit) to another body (unit). Problems associated with many products are the proper flow of energy or fluids from one item or unit to another item or unit trough confined spaces or passages, consequently leading to safety-related problems. The flow-related problem causes include faulty connections between units and complete or partial interconnection failure. In the case of fluid, from the safety aspect factors such as those listed below must be considered carefully ... 

The self-weight was calculated using the unit weight of concrete specified above. The imposed dead load was 3 kN/m, including the load of masonry infill walls, and the live load was 1.5 kN/m. The above loads were combined using partial factors of safety of 1.4 for the permanent loads, and 1.6 for the live load. Material partial factors of 1.5 and 1.15 were used for concrete and steel, respectively. 

Steenbergen, R.D.J.M. Vrouwenvelder, T. 2010. Safety philosophy for existing structures and partial factors for traffic loads on bridges. HERON 55(2) 123-139. Vrouwenvelder, T. 2002. Reliability Based Code calibration. The me of the JCSS Probabilistic Model Code Joint Committee of Structural Scfety Workshop on Code Calibration, 21-22 March 2002, Zurich. 

Presently available information indicates that most European countries have adopted the values of partial factors and other reliability elements recommended in Eurocode EN 1990 (2002) for the basis of structural design. About half of the countries are applying an exp. (6.10) for verification of structures for the Ultimate Limit States (ULS) and other countries exps. (6.10a,b). Both alternatives (6.10) or (6.10a,b) are allowed to be use in some CEN countries including the Czech Republic (limitations in some countries for application of (6.10a,b) are given). Modified exps. (6.10a , b) are applied in few countries where in the first expression the permanent actions are considered only. Some countries which preferred exps. (6.10a,b) increased the value of reduction factor for permanent actions from the recommended value 0.85 up to 0.93 diminishing the difference in application of both alternative load combinations. Therefore, the reliability of structures designed according to the nationally implemented Eurocodes may differ from country to country (allowed by EC as a matter of their national safety). 

B) yield a lower but a more uniform and satisfactory reliability level. It appears that recalibration of partial factors and other safety elements may minimize the deviation of the reliability from its recommended level (given by the reliability index P or probability of failurep. Some countries have selected the alternative (6.10a, 4,b) which leads to a rather low reliability level of structural members. 

When using the Finite Element Method to check the Ultimate Limit State, the reduction factor on the shear strength parameters to introduce failure is often considered as the factor of safety. This factor does not necessarily have to be the same as defined with analytical methods since the uncertainty linked to the method/model used is different. Normally the partial safety factors as required in the Eurocode 7 approach are the required values. 

A substantial divergence in practice is developing over the use of the pseudo-static method. The EC8-5 standard includes various partial factors for use with the pseudo-static method, implying acceptance of that method within the EU. But, North American practice would generally not accept the pseudo-static method because (i) there is a lack of clarity in the meaning of the factor of safety under transient loads - a FS < 1 simply means the slope may move but that movement may... 

Ym partial factor of safety for stone tensile strength recommendation, 1,5... 

The thermal behavior of Li, Ni02 in relation to safety is another key factor when in considering materials for lithium-ion batteries. LiNi02 is stable even when it is heated with an organic electrolyte. However, partially or fully oxidized LiNi02 is quite active toward organic electrolyte oxidation and this reaction is exothermic. 

The reboiler, and a partial condenser if used, act as equilibrium stages. However, when designing a column there is little point in reducing the estimated number of stages to account for this they can be considered additional factors of safety. 

An alternative and more widely used technique for lsO production is via water distillation. The separation factors are much smaller than they are for NO, and the number of plates required, the time to production, and the energy demand and capital costs commensurately larger, but cost of feed, ease of handling, and safety concerns favor water distillation. Production columns are located in the United States, Israel, Russia and other countries. The Israeli plant has the advantage of using already partially enriched Dead Sea water as feed. 

Agent ID50 (i.v. or im) meg/kg ID 50 (i.v. or. i.m) meg/kg ICtso Mg min/ cubic M Onset Time Tonso (h) Partial Recovery Time Toffso (h) Duration of Severe effects Dsofh) Prolong ation-Time (h) Relative Central Potency Safety Factor... 

After consulting Ref. P3 (p.582 Figure 14.2), it is confirmed that the high suction pressure available in this application ensures that cavitation will not occur in the pump. For the calculated specific pump speed, there is a safety factor of over 500%. Cavitation should not be a problem provided that the column is only partially repressurised before turning on the pump (a usual start-up procedure on the absorption column). 

Component-based models are applied to a mixture for which only partial information about its composition is available. In this case, the safety factor is supposed to cover for the components for which information is lacking. The value of the safety factor should reflect the extent of the missing information. 

Safety factors A. Single substance standard does not cover mixture effects B. Partial information C. Interaction effects None Assess information extent Likelihood of interactions... 

---