Partial Factors

When carrying out the required assessments for the design of a strengthening with composite materials, the values of those partial factors should be preliminarily analyzed, which will be employed according to the specific application. 

---

Calculated Spin-Density Distribution (p,) in Xylene Cation-Radicals and Determined Partial Factors ((p,) of Ring-Attack Rates for Nitrations of Neutral Isomeric Xylenes with Nitric Acid in Acetic Anhydride... 

Sources. Calculated spin-density distribution (p,) from Feng et al. 1986 partial factors ([Pg.253]

Scheme 6.1. Partial factors for stannic chloride-catalyzed acetylation.

These equations (also undeduced) may seem pretty fearsome. However, the quantities present in Eq. (5.5), the partial factors, can all be determined from X-ray or neutron diffraction setups. Figures 5.8 and 5.9 show at a schematic level what one does to make diffraction measurements. 

Solving for the dynamics of such system is a highly complex problem. The first simplification amounts to assume an adiabatic separations of nuclei and electrons motions. In this approximation a partial factorization of the total system wavefunction is performed and we consider the ions fixed from the point of view of the electrons. This will lead us to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. 

Another possibility is that some other clotting factor is increased or activated in such a way that the assay system responds fortuitously to it in a way indistinguishable from the usual response to factor VIII, e.g., factors XI and XII factor XII is known to rise on exercise (II). That this might occur over a limited range of the dose-response curve in the thromboplastin generation test system was shown by experiments in which the addition of activation product (Wl) simulated an increased factor VIII concentration (author s unpublished observations, 1960 FI), although statistical invalidity would probably be detectable over a series of experiments if this were the explanation. This also was looked for, but was not found (14). It is interesting that, in a patient with severe factor VIII deficiency and partial factor XI deficiency (SI), adrenaline infusion was followed by a marked rise in factor XI concentration and the appearance of a trace of factor VIII (K. Schulz, personal communication, 1964). Furthermore, the confusion that arose some years ago over factor IX assay now seems to have been due to activation of the contact factors (P4), hence... 

Activated partial factors Inherited factor deficiencies Joint and muscle bleeding... 

For the limit state method instead of nominal loads which are a mixture of standard weights of material (which are defined as fair average values in B.S. 648 1964) and extreme estimates of imposed loads, 5% characteristic loads are used with various partial factors according to the nature of the loading. The design bending moments for the ultimate limit state using the partial factors of 1.4 for dead loads and 1.6 for live loads are thus. 

There has also been, in recent years, an upsurge of interest in matters relating to structural accidents. Reports of enquiries into recent accidents have become compulsive reading, whilst at the same time the redrafting of codes of practice into the limit state format has stimulated inquiry into the use of probability theory to determine suitable partial factors. Another aspect of this interest is the increasing concern about the way in which the behaviour of actual structures differs from the predictions based on idealised theoretical models or on isolated laboratory tests on physical models or elements of structures. 

The design bending moments for the serviceability limit state are obtained by using a different set of partial factors. C.P. 110 recommends that these should be unity and so the design bending moments in this case are 127.74 + 7.80 + 43.48 + 79.64 = 258.66 kNm. 

The ultimate limit state design bending moment is 378 kN m but it is important to recognise which of the factors y, and yc, that the partial factor values used, represent. According to CIRIA Report 63, the values recommended in C.P. 110 include an allowance for all these factors except which is intended to take account of the nature of the structure and its behaviour. In this problem y will also be taken as unity and so the design bending moment for the ultimate limit state remains at 378 kN m. 

Try a 457 x 152 x 52 UB as in Fig. 4.7. The analysis to determine the ultimate moment of resistance of this composite section is as for the ultimate load method but the value a has to include partial factors on material strength. 

It is very clear from the complexity of the situations described in the case studies of the last two chapters, that simple factors of safety, load factors, partial factors or even notional probabilities of failure can cover only a small part of a total description of the safety of a structure. In this chapter we will try to draw some general conclusions from the incidents described as well as others not discussed in any detail in this book. The conclusions will be based upon the general classification of types of failure presented in Section 7.2. Subjective assessments of the truth and importance of the checklist of parameter statements within that classification are analysed using a simple numerical scale and also using fuzzy set theory. This leads us on to a tentative method for the analysis of the safety of a structure yet to be built. The method,however, has several disadvantages which can be overcome by the use of a model based on fuzzy logic. At the end of the chapte(, the discussion of the various possible measures of uncertainty is completed. 

Lyo] SEM, anomalous small-angle X-ray scattering Cu44Fei4Ni42 aged at 550°C. Partial factor structure determination... 

The preconditioner M is a matrix obtained during a partial factorization of the matrix A by Cholesky by limiting as possible the filling-up problem (Nocedal and Wright, 2000). 

Proposed procedures are applied in the assessment of an existing reinforced concrete road bridge. Partial factors are estimated on the basis of new information about the bridge conditions and requirements for a remaining working life. 

Major advantage of the probabilistic assessment consists in estimation of the failure probability that can be directly compared with a target reliability level. However, in civil engineering practice the partial factor method or other similar methods are often used for assessment of existing bridges. The reliability level may then differ for bridges made of different materials and exposed to different actions. In the following the partial factor method introduced in the Eurocodes is discussed only. 

The assessment is based on design values of basic variables derived from characteristic values and partial factors. Partial factors of the actions with unfavourable effects and of resistance with a favourable effect on structural reliability are defined as follows, respectively ... 

The subscript k denotes a characteristic value and the subscript d refers to a design value. To achieve a target reliability level, the partial factors for the time-variant case may be derived from the design values obtained as follows ... 

Symbol Variable Unit Distc Char, value Partial factor Mean/CoV... 

Partial factors for different reliability levels 6.4.1 No deterioration... 

Initially influence of deterioration is neglected. To derive the set of the four partial factors used in the Eurocodes, the partial factor ys is obtained from the individual partial factors of resistance model uncertainties, reinforcement area and yield strength. The partial factor Yc is derived fi om the partial factors of height of slab, concrete cover and concrete strength. The partial factor yo includes the partial factors of the load effect model uncertainties and permanent action and the partial factor yg is a product of the partial factors of the load effect model uncertainties and traffic load effect. 

It appears that the partial factors for concrete and traffic load are rather greater than the recommended values while the factor for permanent actions is significantly lower. When the target reliability index is 3.8 (medium consequences of failure), all the partial factors slightly decrease and the minimum reinforcement area is reduced by about 6 %. Note that the target reliability index 3.8 for bridges is suggested in ENV 1991-1 (1994). 

---