Receptor input data

One can identify two major categories of uncertainty in EIA data (scientific) uncertainty inherited in input data (e.g., incomplete or irrelevant baseline information, project characteristics, the misidentification of sources of impacts, as well as secondary, and cumulative impacts) and in impact prediction based on these data (lack of scientific evidence on the nature of affected objects and impacts, the misidentification of source-pathway-receptor relationships, model errors, misuse of proxy data from the analogous contexts) and decision (societal) uncertainty resulting from, e.g., inadequate scoping of impacts, imperfection of impact evaluation (e.g., insufficient provisions for public participation), human factor in formal decision-making (e.g., subjectivity, bias, any kind of pressure on a decision-maker), lack of strategic plans and policies and possible implications of nearby developments (Demidova, 2002). 

General Approaches for Calculating Critical Loads of Heavy Metals Discussing the problems related to the critical load calculation, an attention should be paid to (i) selection of a receptor of concern, (ii) critical limits, (iii) possible calculation methods, (iv) the necessary input data and (v) the various sources of error and uncertainty (de Vries andBakker, 1998a, 1998b). 

Input data for the most detailed soil model include parameters describing atmospheric deposition, precipitation, evapotranspiration, litterfall, foliar uptake, root uptake, weathering, adsorption and complexation of Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, Ni, Cr and Hg. The input data mentioned above vary as a function of location (receptor area) and receptor (the combination of land and soil type) as shown in Table 6. 

It needs to be emphasized at this point that a model is a mathematical representation of the real world. If two models have the same mathematical representation of the real world, they are, in fact, the same model. Chemical mass balance, principal component factor analysis, target transformation factor analysis, etc. have, for all practical purposes. Identical mathematical representations (Equation 1) of the real world and start with the same input data matrices (Figure 4). The principal difference in these "different receptor models is their approach to the solution of either Equation (1) or Equation (2). 

Three generic types of receptor model have been identified, chemical mass balance, multivariate, and microscopical identification. Each one has certain requirements for input data to provide a specified output. An approach which combines receptor and source models, source/ receptor model hybridization, has also been proposed, but it needs further study. 

The input data required of the multivariate receptor models at their present state-of-the-art are the ambient concentrations, The output with this input, however, is only qualitative. With... 

Source Characterization. All receptor models, even the source/receptor hybrids, require input data about the particulate matter sources. The multivariate models, which can conceivably be used to better estimate source compositions, require an initial knowledge of the chemical species associations in sources. 

A second application of the index is its use to predict candidate molecules to fill molecular cavities. With the increasing use of molecular graphics, the fit, docking, or intercalation of molecules into cavities in macromolecular simulations becomes an important consideration in drug design. The visualizations of proposed receptor sites, enzyme active sites, and other cavities and spaces of interest in macromolecules make it possible to make measurements of the dimensions of a cavity. Of course, the validity of these images depends on the quality of the input data and the assumptions attending the calculations. If the visualized details of a cavity are to be believed, then there is certainly some interest in what molecules may fit that cavity or some part of it. 

In its simplest form, a model requires two types of data inputs information on the source or sources including pollutant emission rate, and meteorological data such as wind velocity and turbulence. The model then simulates mathematically the pollutant s transport and dispersion, and perhaps its chemical and physical transformations and removal processes. The model output is air pollutant concentration for a particular time period, usually at specific receptor locations. 

The purpose of an Exposure Route and Receptor Analysis is to provide methods for estimating individual and population exposure. The results of this step combined with the output of the fate models serve as primary input to the exposure estimation step. Unlike the other analytic steps, the data prepared in this step are not necessarily pollutant-specific. The two discrete components of this analysis are (1) selection of algorithms for estimating individual intake levels of pollutants for each exposure pathway and (2) determination of the regional distribution of study area receptor populations and the temporal factors and behavioral patterns influencing this distribution. 

These results provided support for the hypothesis that the effect of hallucinogenic drugs is mediated by a direct action on serotonergic neurons, possibly one mediated by serotonin receptors. This is consistent with data indicating that raphe neurons receive inputs from other raphe neurons and thus, presumably, contain serotonin receptors on their somata and/or dendrites (65). 

The receptors of interest are soils of agricultural (arable lands, grasslands) and non-agricultural (forests, steppes, heath lands, savanna, etc.) ecosystems. In non-agricultural ecosystems, the atmospheric deposition is the only input of heavy metals. Regarding the Forest ecosystems, a distinction should at least be made between Coniferous and Deciduous Forest ecosystems. When detailed information on the areal distribution of various tree species (e.g., pine, fir, spruce, oak, beech and birch) is available, this should be used since tree species influence the deposition and uptake of heavy metals and the precipitation excess. On a world scale, soil types can be best distinguished on the basis of the FAO-UNESCO Soil Map of the World, climate and ecosystem data from NASA database (1989). 

The data for this example was derived from the supplementary material of the estrogen receptor (ER) ChIP-on-chip publication of Carroll et al. [20]. The dataset consists of three replicates of specific enrichments for the estrogen receptor alpha and RNA Polymerase II versus input controls. All three replicates were performed on the Affymetrix human tiling 1.0 microarrays (14-chip set). 

The available data are consistent with the present thesis that cholinergic inputs to cerebral cortex mediate intradendritic events fundamental to conscious activity as a primary role, and that cholinergic modulation of electrophysiological activity may be secondary, even epiphenomenal. Transduction pathways exist whereby muscarinic receptors (and possibly nicotinic receptors acting presynaptically to inhibit acetylcholine release) may lead to actions on the cytoskeleton directly relevant to consciousness. The thesis presented here describes these pathways and also suggests a possible explanation for the diversity of neuromodulators and metabotropic receptors. Accordingly, qualitative aspects of our consciousness would be finely tuned by a number of neurochemicals, prominent among which is acetylcholine. 

---