Process safety analysis estimation

Process Safety Analysis This part treats the analysis of a process or project from the standpoint of hazards, risks, procedures for making potential damage estimates, and project reviews and audits. It can be helpful to management in assessing risks in a project. It consists of the following ... 

Assume that the system described below exists in a process unit recently purchased by your company. As the manager, the safety of this unit is now your responsibility. You are concerned because your process hazard analysis team identified the potential for an operator error to result in a rupture of the propane condenser. You have commissioned a human reliability analysis (HRA) to estimate the likelihood of the condenser rupturing as the result of such an error and to identify ways to reduce the expected frequency of such ruptures... 

In analyzing the safety of a waste repository, it is crucial to know the time period under consideration. A number of geologic processes and events are relevant for the safety analysis only if the time frame exceeds a certain range. As it is obvious that the hazard of a waste repository due to the decrease of its radioactive inventory will eventually approach a level that is no longer significant, it will be feasible to estimate a time frame for the safety analysis. This time frame will be called the significant period of the waste repository hazard. The estimation of... 

Other appUcstions of themiodynaoiics considered in this book include how chemicals distribute when released to the environment, determining.safety by estimating the possible impact (or energy release) of mechanical and chemical explosions, the analysis of biochemical processes, and product design, that is. identifying a chemical or mixture that has the properties needed for a specific application. 

Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) identifies conditions that cause people to err and provides estimates of error rates based on past statistics and behavioural studies. Some examples of human error contributing to chemical process safety risk include ... 

The basis for the safety analysis of a plant is its P I diagram and a detailed description of the process. The plant is contemplated pipe by pipe. In each pipe the guidewords are applied to process parameters such as mass flow, pressure, temperature and concentration. Possible causes and consequences of deviations analyzed by thought experiments are identified. This enables one to decide on the necessity and type of possibly required countermeasures. The process of analysis may be supported by estimates of the frequency of occurrence of deviations and the extent of the accompanying consequences. 

This paper presents a new approach based on a combination of traditional predictive modelling and event/fault tree analysis techniques, which allows representing at the same time evolution of hazards and normal and abnormal (i.e. failures) performance of safety measures, e.g. variations of process parameters, analysis and inspections, through the food chain for a better estimation of the real impact of such deviations/failures on consumer health. 

Each new plant that fabricates, processes, or otherwise handles fissionable materials undergoes a safety analysis prior to startup. One part of the safety analysis is to assess the potential consequences of a postulated woi t credible criticality accident. To perform this assessment, the total energy release—expressed as total number of fissions from the criticality excursion—must be estimated or assumed. This paper presents the results of study for development of an empirical model to estimate energy release from a criticality accident. 

Reactor A process hazards analysis identifies a hazard associated with a reactor dump valve. If the dump valve opens when the reactor is not depressurized, downstream equipment is overpressured. An SIF is implemented to prevent the reactor dump valve from opening when the pressure is high, using a solenoid-operated valve that controls the instrument air supply to the dump valve actuator. To support batch operation, the SIF energizes the solenoid-operated valve for each batch when the reactor pressure is low. However, from a safety perspective, the SIF prevents a hazardous event only when the control system fails and tries to open the control valve when the reactor is under pressure. This failure is estimated to be approximately 1 in 10 years. The SIF is operating in demand mode with regard to the hazard. 

PHA, What-If, Bow-Tie, and HAZOP reviews are the most common industry quahtative methods used to conduct process hazard analyses, while SVAs are typically applied for process security analyses requirements. It is quahtatively estimated that up to 80% of a company s hazard identification and process safety analyses may consist of PHA, What-If, Bow-Tie, and HAZOP reviews, with the remaining 20% from Checkhst, Fault Tree Analysis, Event Tree, Failure Mode, and Effects Analysis, etc. 

As a general rule, clinical data are required as evidence to support conformity with the requirements of the Active Implantable Medical Devices (AIMD) and the Medical Device (MD) directives with regards to safety and effectiveness under the normal conditions of use, evaluation of undesirable side effects, and the acceptability of the benefit/risk ratio. Risk analysis should be used to establish key objectives that need to be addressed by clinical data, or alternatively to justify why clinical data are not required (mainly for Class I devices). The risk analysis process should help the manufacturer to identify known (or reasonably foreseeable) hazards associated with the use of the device, and decide how best to investigate and estimate the risks associated with each hazard. The clinical data should then be used to establish the safety and effectiveness of the device under the intended use conditions, and to demonstrate that any of the residual risks are acceptable, when weighed against the benefits derived from use of the device. 

It is most important that the whole life cycle of a process plant can be evaluated on safety. Safety and risk analyses evaluate the probability of a risk to appear, and the decisions of necessary preventative actions are made after results of an analysis. The aim of the risk estimation is to support the decision making on plant localization, alternative processes and plant layout. Suokas and Kakko (1993) have introduced steps of a safety and risk analysis in Figure 2. The safety and risk analysis can be done on several levels. The level on which the analysis is stopped depends on the complexity of the object for analysis and the risk potential. 

Evaluate the risks associated with the process and its safety systems taken as a whole, including consideration of people, property, business, and the environment, that could be affected by loss events and determine whether the risks have been adequately reduced (Hazard Analysis, Risk Analysis, Source Models, Atmospheric Dispersion, Estimation of Damage Effects). 

For this cost analysis, an estimate of site support facilities was also performed. These costs included monitoring and control offices, site enclosure, control and safety equipment, waste preparation, waste shipping and processing, employee facilities, foundations, and installation of utilities (D17156M, pp. 17-18). These costs are also summarized in Table 1. 

---