General problem formulation

The inclusion of the state space realization of Q within an optimization formulation will be outlined here. In order to illustrate some of the details of the formulation, a specific problem will be considered variations to address other scenarios such as determination of a closed-loop performance limit for a fixed design, follow in a straightforward manner. In so doing, the variables and constraints within the general problem formulation (PI) in Section 3 will be separated into groupings that represent the various components of the overall system. 

The two formulations discussed are outlined in the sequel based on the generalized problem formulation (12.402). 

The basic idea of the least-squares method is to minimize the integral of the square of the residual over the computational domain. In order to find the approximation in the sense of the least squares error, the following norm-equivalent least-squares function is defined for the generalized problem formulation (12.402) ... 

In the following, the general implementation issues of the generalized problem formulation (12.402) are presented. Based on variational or weighted residual principles (weak formulation), the algebraic equation system (12.401) where A andF are defined by (12.462) and (12.463) or alternatively (12.475) and (12.476) as obtained by the weak formulation of the least-squares technique can be presented as ... 

Considering the strong formulation of the boundary conditions, the following norm-equivalent least-squares function is defined for the generalized problem formulation... 

Considering the generalized problem formulation (12.402), the inner product minimization statement is presented by (12.494), with manipulations of the resulting equation system to enforce the strong form of the boundary conditions ... 

Consider the generalize problem formulation defined by (12.402a) and (12.402b). The inner product minimization statement is given by (12.494). In both the Galerkin and tau methods, the weighting functions are chosen identical to the basis function, i.e. WQj = if (C z). Hence,... 

The considered problem is formulated as a variational inequality. In general, the equations (3.140)-(3.142) hold in the sense of distributions. In addition to (3.143), complementary boundary conditions will be fulfilled on F, X (0,T). The exact form of these conditions is given at the end of the section. The assumption as to sufficient solution regularity requires the variational inequality to be a corollary of (3.140)-(3.142), the initial and all boundary conditions. The relationship between these two problem formulations is discussed in Section 3.4.4. We prove an existence of the solution in Section 3.4.2. In Section 3.4.3 the main result of the section concerned with the cracks of minimal opening is established. 

The original formulation of de Bruijn s theorem was for a quite general problem of this type, with a broad definition of the "weight" of a mapping. We assume that R is the union of a finite number of pairwise disjoint sets R- (i = 1,. .., k and that // is a direct product of groups //j, where //j acts on / j. For each there is a weight function where n is the number of elements of D that are... 

However, serious difficulties appeared later when efforts were made to attack more general problems not necessarily of the nearly-linear character. In terms of the van der Pol equation this occurs when the parameter is not small. Here the progress was far more difficult and the results less definite moreover there appeared two distinct theories, one of which was formulated by physicists along the lines of the theory of shocks in mechanics, and the other which was analytical and involved the use of the asymptotic expansions (Part IV of this chapter). The latter, however, turned out to be too complicated for practical purposes, and has not been extended sufficiently to be of general usefulness. 

The type of theories we will be using to prove dominance and/or equivalence of solutions will not be specific to the particular problem domain, but will rely on more general features of the problem formulation. Thus, for our flowshop example, we will not rely on the fact that we are dealing with processing times, end-times, or start-times, to formulate the general theory. The general theory will be in terms of sufficient statements about the underlying mathematical relationships, as described in Section III. 

Expressing this theory shifts the emphasis of creating specific knowledge for each problem formulation, to developing pieces of theory for more general problems. The method allows the computer to put these pieces together, based on the specific details of the problem, and the opportunities that the problem solving reveals. 

The minimal cost design problem formulated above was solved by Bickel et al. (B7) using the generalized reduced gradient (GRG) method of Abadie and Guigou (H4). If x and u are vectors of state and decision (independent) variables and u) is the objective function in a minimization subject to constraints [Eq. (90)], then the reduced gradient d/du is given by... 

Chapter 9 deals with the general problem of joint parameter estimation data reconciliation. Starting from the typical parameter estimation problem, the more general formulation in terms of the error-in-variable methods is described, where measurement errors in all variables are considered. Some solution techniques are also described here. 

From the results of the previous theorem, we conclude that any system that is estimable and redundant (r > 0) admits a decomposition into its redundant (x0 and nonredundant parts (X2). This conclusion is of paramount importance when applied within the framework of the overall estimation problem. Such a decomposition then allows a new equivalent two-problem formulation of the general least squares problem ... 

Data reconciliation can now be performed on the reduced subsystem containing only measured variables. We can now state the general problem as the equivalent two-problem formulation discussed in the previous chapter. 

In Chapters 3 and 4 we have shown that the vector of process variables can be partitioned into four different subsets (1) overmeasured, (2) just-measured, (3) determinable, and (4) indeterminable. It is clear from the previous developments that only the overmeasured (or overdetermined) process variables provide a spatial redundancy that can be exploited for the correction of their values. It was also shown that the general data reconciliation problem for the whole plant can be replaced by an equivalent two-problem formulation. This partitioning allows a significant reduction in the size of the constrained least squares problem. Accordingly, in order to identify the presence of gross (bias) errors in the measurements and to locate their sources, we need only to concentrate on the largely reduced set of balances... 

In this chapter, the general problem of joint parameter estimation and data reconciliation was discussed. First, the typical parameter estimation problem was analyzed, in which the independent variables are error-free, and aspects related to the sequential processing of the information were considered. Later, the more general formulation in terms of the error-in-variable method (EVM), where measurement errors in all variables are considered in the parameter estimation problem, was stated. Alternative solution techniques were briefly discussed. Finally, joint parameter-state estimation in dynamic processes was considered and two different approaches, based on filtering techniques and nonlinear programming techniques, were discussed. 

Numerous applications have been shown to exist that overcome the general problems of lack of volatility and instability at higher temperatures that principally hamper direct analysis of surfactants by GC methods. Thus, a whole suite of derivatisation techniques are available for the gas chromatographist to successfully determine anionic, non-ionic and cationic surfactants in the environment. This enables the analyst to combine the high-resolution chromatography that capillary GC offers with sophisticated detection methods such as mass spectrometry. In particular, for the further elucidation of the complex mixtures, which is typical for the composition of many of the commercial surfactant formulations, the high resolving power of GC will be necessary. 

In general, the formulation of the problem of vapor-liquid equilibria in these systems is not difficult. One has the mass balances, dissociation equilibria in the solution, the equation of electroneutrality and the expressions for the vapor-liquid equilibrium of each molecular species (equality of activities). The result is a system of non-linear equations which must be solved. The main thermodynamic problem is the relation of the activities of the species to be measurable properties, such as pressure and composition. In order to do this a model is needed and the parameters in the model are usually obtained from experimental data on the mixtures involved. Calculations of this type are well-known in geological systems O) where the vapor-liquid equilibria are usually neglected. 

---