Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phase Interference

The final SFG intensity is the square of the sum of the non-linear susceptibilities and the input electric fields, as shown in (3). In general, the second-order polarizability is a complex quantity, as shown in (7) [Pg.167]

the exponents, 9 and 0, describe the phase of the resonant term and the non-resonant term, respectively. The phase difference appears in the cross-product of the two terms [20, 23]. Therefore, they can interfere either constructively or destrac-tively with each other. The phase of the non-Hnear signal is related to the direction of the oscillating dipole [24]. For example, the phase factor, is -i-l or -1 for up or down orientations. Often the resonant and non-resonant susceptibilities will interfere and give rise to a more compHcated Hne shape in the spectrum As an example, Fig. 5.3 A shows the variation in peak shape for a resonant peak with phase 9 = —nil (on resonance), as the non-resonant phase varies from j) to p = k/I. [Pg.168]

An additional complication arises because most spectra involve several resonance peaks, that will result in multiple interferences and sometimes complicated-looking spectra that require careful analysis to interpret properly (see Fig. 5.21). [Pg.168]

For surfaces that are isotropic in the x-y plane there are four independent macroscopic susceptibilities that contribute to the SFG signal Xyji=lraa. Xzzz Xxzx=Xjzj and Xzxx=Xzyy Each of these susceptibilities can be accessed through different combinations of input and output polarizations. These are referred as s- and p-polarized (i.e. electric vector perpendicular or parallel to the plane of incidence, respectively). I is the field intensity for each beam at the surface, where the subscript indices indicate the polarization of the sum frequency, visible, and [Pg.168]


Phase interference in optical or material systems can be utilized to achieve a type of quantum measmement, known as nondemolition measurements ([41], Chapter 19). The general objective is to make a measurement that does not change some property of the system at the expense of some other property(s) that is (are) changed. In optics, it is the phase that may act as a probe for determining the intensity (or photon number). The phase can change in the comse of the measurement, while the photon number does not [126]. [Pg.103]

Electron spectroscopic techniques require vacuums of the order of 10 Pa for their operation. This requirement arises from the extreme surface-specificity of these techniques, mentioned above. With sampling depths of only a few atomic layers, and elemental sensitivities down to 10 atom layers (i. e., one atom of a particular element in 10 other atoms in an atomic layer), the techniques are clearly very sensitive to surface contamination, most of which comes from the residual gases in the vacuum system. According to gas kinetic theory, to have enough time to make a surface-analytical measurement on a surface that has just been prepared or exposed, before contamination from the gas phase interferes, the base pressure should be 10 Pa or lower, that is, in the region of ultrahigh vacuum (UHV). [Pg.9]

Microbore HPLC-FTIR detection limits are about 10 times lower than analytical-scale HPLC-FTIR detection limits. The lowest reported LC-FTIR detection limits are approximately 100-1000 times higher than the best GC-FTIR detection limits. The main characteristics of flow-cell HPLC-FTIR are summarised in Table 7.44. Because of mobile-phase interferences, flow-cell HPLC-FTIR is considered as a powerful tool only for the specific detection of major components but is otherwise a method of limited potential, and SFE-SFC-FTTR has been proposed as an alternative [391]. [Pg.491]

Zeno paradox. On the other hand, recovering these interferences from a single path leads to excessive correlation, as evidenced by the highly oscillatory results obtained with TSH for Tully s third, extended coupling with reflection, model. This is remedied effortlessly in FMS, and one may speculate that FMS will tend to the opposite behavior Interferences that are truly present will tend to be damped if insufficient basis functions are available. This is probably preferable to the behavior seen in TSH, where there is a tendency to accentuate phase interferences and it is often unclear whether the interference effects are treated correctly. This last point can be seen in the results of the second, dual avoided crossing, model, where the TSH results exhibit oscillation, but with the wrong structure at low energies. The correct behavior can be reproduced by the FMS calculations with only ten basis functions [38]. [Pg.467]

Noncrossing rule, geometric phase theory, 2 Nondemolition measurements, phase interference, 207... [Pg.89]

A blank plate is also prepared to rule out any solvent, stationary phase, or mobile phase interference. An HPTLC plate is simply developed in the same manner as the other plates, dried, scraped, and extracted as described above. Figure 13.23 shows a blank plate scraped for HPLC analysis. [Pg.436]

This extracted and dried blank sample is also evaluated by HPLC to rule out any extraneous bands due to solvent interaction or stationary phase interference. [Pg.436]

Also called vapour-phase interferences or cation enhancement. In the air-acetylene flame, the intensity of rubidium absorption can be doubled by the addition of potassium. This is caused by ionization suppression (see Section 2.2.3), but if uncorrected will lead to substantial positive errors when the samples contain easily ionized elements and the standards do not. An example is when river water containing varying levels of sodium is to be analysed for a lithium tracer, and the standards, containing pure lithium chloride solutions, do not contain any ionization suppressor. [Pg.47]

Given how easily the two types of interference discussed above can be overcome, this third type constitutes the biggest source of problems in AAS. A brief discussion is given of solid-phase interferences centred around the following classification ... [Pg.48]

Clarity is noted when the light passes through a homogeneous sample, such as a crystalline, ordered polymer or a completely pure amorphous phase. Interference occurs when the light beam passes through a heterogeneous... [Pg.50]

The oscillatory structure just mentioned has been clearly demonstrated to result from quantum-mechanical phase-interference phenomena. The necessary condition264,265 for the occurrence of oscillatory structure in the total cross section is the existence in the internuclear potentials of an inner pseudocrossing, at short internuclear distance, as well as an outer pseudo-crossing, at long internuclear distance. A schematic illustration of this dual-interaction model, proposed by Rosenthal and Foley,264 is shown in Fig. 37. The interaction can be considered to involve three separate phases, as discussed by Tolk and et al. 279 (1) the primary excitation mechanism, in which, as the collision partners approach, a transition is made from the ground UQ state to at least two inelastic channels U, and U2 (the transition occurs at the internuclear separation 7 , the inner pseudocrossing, in Fig. 37), (2) development of a phase difference between the inelastic channels,... [Pg.153]

In the Anderson picture the suppression of classical chaotic diffusion is understood as a destructive phase interference phenomenon that limits the spread of the rotor wave function over the available angular momentum space. The localization effect has no classical analogue. It is purely quantum mechanical in origin. The localization of the quantum rotor wave function in the angular momentum space can be demonstrated readily by plotting the absolute squares of the time averaged expansion amplitudes... [Pg.134]

Lecren, L., Wemsdorfer, W., Li, Y, Roubeau, O., Miyasaka, H., and Clerac, R. (2005) Quantum tunneling and quantum phase interference in a [Mn Mn ] single-molecule magnet. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127, 11311-11317. [Pg.404]

For EIA, u-NPG, which is converted to o-nitrophenol (o-NP), is preferred since the relative catalytic rate is considerably higher and less solid-phase interference is expected. Composition of the assay mixture is given in Table 10.8. The coupled reaction is measured by the absorbance of NADH (a = 6.22 cm pmole at 340 nm), whereas in the alternative assay o-NP is measured (a = 18.5 cm / pmole at 405 nm). The change of optical density, which is measured per minute, is used for the calculation of the volume activity in... [Pg.191]


See other pages where Phase Interference is mentioned: [Pg.57]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.3833]    [Pg.643]   


SEARCH



Filtering techniques, phase interference

Gas-phase interferences

Interference effects phase properties

Interference microscopy phase stepping

Interference phase, laser interferometry

Interference signal, geometrical phase

Molecular systems, quantum interference phase control

Multiphoton intrapulse interference phase scan

Nondemolition measurements, phase interference

Phase Measurement Interference Microscopy (PMIM)

Phase interference microscopy

Quantum interference phase control

Reflectometric Interference Spectroscopy (RIfS) in the Liquid Phase

© 2024 chempedia.info