Interference phase, laser interferometry

In this chapter we explore several aspects of interferometric nonlinear microscopy. Our discussion is limited to methods that employ narrowband laser excitation i.e., interferences in the spectral domain are beyond the scope of this chapter. Phase-controlled spectral interferometry has been used extensively in broadband CARS microspectroscopy (Cui et al. 2006 Dudovich et al. 2002 Kee et al. 2006 Lim et al. 2005 Marks and Boppart 2004 Oron et al. 2003 Vacano et al. 2006), in addition to several applications in SHG (Tang et al. 2006) and two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy (Ando et al. 2002 Chuntonov et al. 2008 Dudovich et al. 2001 Tang et al. 2006). Here, we focus on interferences in the temporal and spatial domains for the purpose of generating new contrast mechanisms in the nonlinear imaging microscope. Special emphasis is given to the CARS technique, because it is sensitive to the phase response of the sample caused by the presence of spectroscopic resonances. 

Things are not quite as simple as they seem. In order for the constructive interference, which is at the core of wavepacket interferometry, to occur, not only must (t + At) = (t), but also the phases of apump and aprobe> which depend on the optical phase of the femtosecond laser rather than the molecular phase, must match. A rigorous treatment of the phase coherent pump/probe scheme using optically phase-locked pulse pairs is presented by Scherer, et al., [1990, 1991, 1992] and refined by Albrecht, et al., (1999), who discuss the distinction between and consequences of pulse envelope delays vs. carrier wave phase shifts (see Fig. 9.6). A simplified treatment, valid only for weak optical pulses is presented here. 

---