Resolution 3 , chromatographic

Chromatographic resolution is defined as the distance between the concentration maxima of two elution zones, expressed in the units of the mean standard deviation of these zones. When considering a chromatographic record plotted in coordinates with the detector response as a function of the solute concentration in the column effluent on the ordinate, and the time elapsed from the start of the chromatographic run on the abscissa, the resolution (RS) of the peaks of compounds 1 and 2 having the retention times ri the standard deviations ct and a,2 can be described by the relation 

If the peaks are of roughly the same height and symmetrical, an almost complete separation of them can be attained at RS = 4. However, with peaks having considerably different heights larger RS values are required for the same separation effect to be attained. 

On the basis of the relations discussed in sections 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 it can be easily derived that 

Equations 74 and 75 show that, whereas the distance between the concentration maxima of two migrating zones increases linearly with their migration distance, their standard deviations increase only as the square root of the length of the migration distance. This fact represents the basic principle of chromatographic separation. By combining equations 73, 74 and 75, the equation 

Equation 76 makes it possible to calculate the number of theoretical plates necessary for a required resolution of the peaks of components 1 and 2. As the 

In the final parf of this chapter, we focus on novel trends in chromatographic method development related to the analytical quality by design initiative (AQbD). We provide a real life example of several practical steps taken in the method development workflow. 

Chromatographic resolution in liquid chromatography (LC) is determined by three factors [2] efficiency (N), selectivity (a), and a retention 

High Resolution Liquid Chromatography through Increased Efficiency 

Efficiency in liquid chromatography is directly proportional to the column length (L) and indirectly proportional to the particle diameter (dp) [3,4]. Resolution can therefore be increased either by using a longer column or a smaller particle size. 

The pressure drop across the column is directly proportional to the column length and the viscosity (q) of the mobile phase [4]  

The goal of chromatography is to separate a sample into a series of chromatographic peaks, each representing a single component of the sample. Resolution is a quantitative measure of the degree of separation between two chromatographic peaks, A and B, and is defined as 

In a chromatographic analysis of lemon oil a peak for limonene has a retention time of 8.36 min with a baseline width of 0.96 min. y-Terpinene elutes at 9.54 min, with a baseline width of 0.64 min. What is the resolution between the two peaks  

The time required for unretained solutes to move from the point of injection to the detector (tm). 

Two methods for improving chromatographic resolution (a) Original separation showing a pair of poorly resolved solutes (b) Improvement in resolution due to an increase in column efficiency  

It is also assumed that, for two closely eluting peaks, the values of N and of V (= N.v ) are the same for the two analytes. In Equation [3.22], expressing Vj. in units of the phase volume and using the inflection point value A Vi from Equation [3.19] as AVj., gives  

However, the capacity ratio was defined in Equation [3.16] as k = K.Vj/v, so the number of plates required to resolve A from B according to the criterion expressed in Equation [3.22] is  

Recall that the values of k can be calculated from the chromatograms using Equation [3.17], so that once the desired value of R b has been specified the necessary value of N /b can be calculated. The second form of Equation [3.23a] used the definition of ttA/e in Equation [3.16] that also shows how this parameter can be evaluated from the chromatograms. Alternatively, Equation [3.23a] can be rearranged to give an expression for R  

A second model, the theory of plates, was developed by Martin and Synge in 1941. This is based on the functioning of a fractionating column, then as now a widely used separation technique. It is assumed that the equilibrium between two phases on each plate of the column has been fully established. Using the plate theory, 

The chromatography column is divided up into theoretical plates, that is, into column sections in the flow direction, the separating capacity of each one corresponding to a theoretical plate. The length of each section of column is called the height equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP). The HETP value is calculated from the length of the column L divided by the number of theoretical plates N  

For asymmetric peaks, the half width (the peak width at half height) is used  

The resolution R of two neighbouring peaks is defined as the quotient of the distance between the two peak maxima, that is, the difference between the two retention times tn 

---

Now that we have defined capacity factor, selectivity, and column efficiency we consider their relationship to chromatographic resolution. Since we are only interested in the resolution between solutes eluting with similar retention times, it is safe to assume that the peak widths for the two solutes are approximately the same. Equation 12.1, therefore, is written as... 

Use of column selectivity to improve chromatographic resolution showing (a) the variation in retention time with mobile phase pH, and (b) the resulting change in alpha with mobile phase pH. 

Quantitative mass spectrometry, also used for pharmaceutical appHcations, involves the use of isotopicaHy labeled internal standards for method calibration and the calculation of percent recoveries (9). Maximum sensitivity is obtained when the mass spectrometer is set to monitor only a few ions, which are characteristic of the target compounds to be quantified, a procedure known as the selected ion monitoring mode (sim). When chlorinated species are to be detected, then two ions from the isotopic envelope can be monitored, and confirmation of the target compound can be based not only on the gc retention time and the mass, but on the ratio of the two ion abundances being close to the theoretically expected value. The spectrometer cycles through the ions in the shortest possible time. This avoids compromising the chromatographic resolution of the gc, because even after extraction the sample contains many compounds in addition to the analyte. To increase sensitivity, some methods use sample concentration techniques. 

Naphthyl)ethyl isocyanate 2 for chromatographic resolution of alcohols, hydroxy esters thiols via diastereomenc derivatives. 

Fig. 2.4. Preparative chromatographic resolution of 5 g of )/-phenyl-)>-butyrolactone on 480 g of CTA I (column 5 cm x 60 cm). [Reproduced from Helv. Chim. Acta 70 1569 (1987) by permission of Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta, A.G.]...

To reiterate the definition of chromatographic resolution a separation is achieved in a chromatographic system by moving the peaks apart and by constraining the peak dispersion so that the individual peaks can be eluted discretely. Thus, even if the column succeeds in meeting this criterion, the separation can still be destroyed if the peaks are dispersed in parts of the apparatus other than the column. It follows that extra-column dispersion must be controlled and minimized to ensure that the full performance of the column is realized. 

To realistically evaluate the effect of extra-column dispersion on column performance, it is necessary to evaluate the maximum extra-column dispersion that can be tolerated by different types of columns. Such data will indicate the level to which dispersion in the detector and its associated conduits must be constrained to avoid abrogating the chromatographic resolution. 

One of the most important properties of a chromatographic column is the separation efficiency. A measure of this parameter could be the difference of the retention volume for two different compounds. The result of a GPC analysis is usually, however, only one large peak, and a separation into consecutive molar mass species is not possible. Additionally there is no standard for higher molar masses consisting only of a species that is truly monodisperse. Therefore, the application of the equation to the chromatographic resolution of low... 

HPLC separations are one of the most important fields in the preparative resolution of enantiomers. The instrumentation improvements and the increasing choice of commercially available chiral stationary phases (CSPs) are some of the main reasons for the present significance of chromatographic resolutions at large-scale by HPLC. Proof of this interest can be seen in several reviews, and many chapters have in the past few years dealt with preparative applications of HPLC in the resolution of chiral compounds [19-23]. However, liquid chromatography has the attribute of being a batch technique and therefore is not totally convenient for production-scale, where continuous techniques are preferred by far. 

The chromatographic resolution of bi-naphthol enantiomers was considered for simulation purposes [18]. The chiral stationary phase is 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl phenyl-glycine bonded to silica gel and a mixture of 72 28 (v/v) heptane/isopropanol was used as eluent. The adsorption equilibrium isotherms, measured at 25 °C, are of bi-Langmuir type and were proposed by the Separex group ... 

Chromatographic resolution of metal complexes on Sephadex ion exchangers. Y. Yoshikawa and K. Yamasaki, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1979, 28, 205-229 (98). 

Solute retention, and consequently chromatographic resolution, is determined by the magnitude of the distribution coefficients of the solutes with respect to the stationary phase and relative to each other. As already suggested, the magnitude of the distribution coefficient is, in turn, controlled by molecular forces between the solutes and the two phases. The procedure by which the analyst can manipulate the solute/phase interactions to effect the desired resolution will also be discussed in chapter 2. 

It follows that measurements must be made with a precision of about 0.2 second if quantitative results are to be of any value. It is seen from figure 4 that the experimental points lie very close to the line and a fairly accurate measurement of the distribution of the two isotopes can be obtained from retention time measurements. This method has very limited areas of application and is given here, more to demonstrate the effect of unresolved impurities on retention time, than to suggest it as an alternative to adequate chromatographic resolution. In some cases, however, particularly in the analysis of isotopes, it may be the only practical way to obtain a quantitative evaluation of the mixture by a liquid chromatographic method. 

In order to answer this question, we should not consider the chromatographic resolution in isolation but in conjunction with the selectivity of the detector. If the detector is not selective, i.e. we cannot isolate the signal resulting from the analyte from those representing the other compounds present, we must rely on the chromatographic resolution to provide a signal which is measurable with sufficient precision and accuracy. If, however, the detector has sufficient selectivity... 

The advantage of the ToF instrument, in addition to its simplicity, is its fast scanning capability and for this reason it is increasingly being encountered in LC-MS instrumentation, particularly when fast analysis or high chromatographic resolution is involved. 

Suppression effects are experienced in static FAB, with signals from more hydrophilic materials being reduced compared to those from hydrophobic components. There are fewer suppression effects in dynamic FAB and this is of benefit when it is not possible to achieve complete chromatographic resolution. 

Sequence information for the remaining fragments was obtained by Edman degradation (see Section 5.3.1 above) after isolation of the individual peptides using preparative HPLC - the chromatographic resolution being sufficient to allow this, and thus enabled the complete sequence to be determined. 

Preparative chromatographic resolution procedures have overall freed chemists from the constraint of dependency on crystallization. They are most often performed with covalent diastereomer mixtures but ionic salts can also be separated. Recently, it was found that the lipophilicity of TRISPHAT anion 8 profoundly modifies the chromatographic properties of the cations associated with it and the resulting ion pairs are usually poorly retained on polar chromatographic phases (Si02, AI2O3) [131]. Using enantiopure TRISPHAT anion. 

A normal-phase HPLC separation seems to be useful to separate major chlorophyll derivatives, but it is not compatible with samples in water-containing solvents an additional extraction step is required to eliminate water from the extract since its presence rednces chromatographic resolution and interferes with retention times. Besides that, the analysis cannot be considered quantitative due to the difhculty in transferring componnds from the acetone solution into the ether phase. On the other hand, an advantage of the normal-phase method is its efficacy to separate magne-sinm-chlorophyll chelates from other metal-chelated chlorophyll derivatives. ... 

While earlier papers cited buffer systems or aqueous o-phosphoric acid to achieve satisfactory peak resolution, most recent investigations involved acetic acid or formic acid systems. " Representative examples are 0.2% and 1% HCOOH for betacyanins and betaxanthins, respectively, the latter requiring a lower pH for chromatographic resolution. Methanol or acetonitrile are most commonly used as modifiers, either undiluted or diluted with purified water at ratios of 60 40 or 80 20 (v/v), respectively. - Typical HPLC fingerprints for yellow and red beet juice are shown in Figure 6.4.1. 

PAHs introduced in Section 34.1. A PCA applied on the transpose of this data matrix yields abstract chromatograms which are not the pure elution profiles. These PCs are not simple as they show several minima and/or maxima coinciding with the positions of the pure elution profiles (see Fig. 34.6). By a varimax rotation it is possible to transform these PCs into vectors with a larger simplicity (grouped variables and other variables near to zero). When the chromatographic resolution is fairly good, these simple vectors coincide with the pure factors, here the elution profiles of the species in the mixture (see Fig. 34.9). Several variants of the varimax rotation, which differ in the way the rotated vectors are normalized, have been reviewed by Forina et al. [2]. 

---