In-phase interactions

According to frontier molecular orbital theory (FMO), the reactivity, regio-chemistry and stereochemistry of the Diels-Alder reaction are controlled by the suprafacial in phase interaction of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of one component and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the other. [17e, 41-43, 64] These orbitals are the closest in energy Scheme 1.14 illustrates the two dominant orbital interactions of a symmetry-allowed Diels-Alder cycloaddition. 

The unsymmetrization of the nitrogen non-bonding orbital (n ) was due to out-of-phase interaction of the electron-rich a orbital at the (3 positions (115), which leads to syn addition. Furthermore, in-phase interaction of the nitrogen non-bonding orbital (n ) with the low-lying vacant a orbitals (116, due to the electron-withdrawing CF3 groups) can contribute to the syn preference. 

The above rate equations confirm the suggested explanation of dynamics of silver particles on the surface of zinc oxide. They account for their relatively fast migration and recombination, as well as formation of larger particles (clusters) not interacting with electronic subsystem of the semiconductor. Note, however, that at longer time intervals, the appearance of a new phase (formation of silver crystals on the surface) results in phase interactions, which are accompanied by the appearance of potential jumps influencing the electronic subsystem of a zinc oxide film. Such an interaction also modifies the adsorption capability of the areas of zinc oxide surface in the vicinity of electrodes [43]. 

Fig. 10. DFT orbital picture showing the in-phase interaction of boron s empty p AO in the LUMO of...

A further distinction must be made between ligands of both types, namely the ability to receive electrons by pi back donation from the metal. This ability has a number of important consequences, beside the obvious one of increased thermodynamic stability of the bond. The energy of the nonbonded valence orbitals, chiefly of the dxy, dxz, or dyz type, is lowered by the in-phase interaction. 

The stereochemical course of the rearrangement is controlled by suprafacial in-phase interactions of the participating molecular [n-s-fa s-i-jc s] orbitals and is consistent with that predicted by frontier molecular orbital theory and orbital symmetry rules. 

For the waves to be in phase (interact constructively), the difference in path length must be equal to the wavelength. A, times an integer, n. This leads to the condition known as the Bragg equation. 

The electronics behind olefin coordination to group 4 cationic L2MtR+ species has been studied in details by Marynick, Morokuma, and co-workers. ° Their analysis indicates that while the Mt—R bond in the Cs-symmetric Cl2TiCH3+ species chiefly involves a metal orbital which corresponds to the lai orbital of Figure 1, the olefin coordination is due to in-phase interactions between the olefin r-orbital with metal orbitals corresponding to the 2ai, mainly, and to one lobe of the lb2 orbitals of Figure 1. A good overlap between the olefin r-orbital and these metal orbitals... 

There is another approach to predicting the stereochemistry of electrocyclic ring closures. One simply looks at the ends of the HOMO to conclude the proper direction for rotation of the bond by creating in-phase interactions during closure. Show that this method also predicts conrotatory closure for butadiene and disrotatory closure for hexatriene. 

In turn, the share of the transformed components participating in phase interaction can be expressed with the equation, which can be considered as a modified Avrami equation. 

Cyclopropenones have a band at 1865-1840 cm due mainly to the carbonyl stretch, but with some out-of-phase interaction with the cyclopropene ring C=C bond. A second band at 1660-1600 cm is due mainly to the ring C=C stretch but with some in-phase interaction with the C=0. ... 

It is the same in the Huckel method / is negative because the low energy solution is an in-phase interaction and because two adjacent p orbitals overlap positively. 

There is however a notable exception for the allyl radical the trust parameter, T = 0 %, indicates an incorrect HL-CI wave function. This surprising result can be traced back in the assumption B<0 (13.19) and inspection of the symmetry of the allyl radical state provides an explanation. As mentioned earlier in Sect. 13.2.1, this assumption implies an in-phase interaction between the Lewis structures (positive c,-coefficients in (13.16)). As pointed out by Goddard [25], this actually corresponds to an excited state. In the allyl radical case, the ground state space symmetry is A2 (C2v point group), as can be seen from Fig. 13.4. The Hiickel wave function is antisymmetric with respect to the molecular plane. Thus, only an out-of-phase combination of the resonant structures Pr and Wr can account for the correct symmetry of the ground state, since each structure and... 

---