Mobile phase interaction probability

When the silica surface is in contact with a solvent, the surface is covered with a layer of the solvent molecules. If the mobile phase consists of a mixture of solvents, the solvents compete for the surface and it is partly covered by one solvent and partly by the other. Thus, any solute interacting with the stationary phase may well be presented with two, quite different types of surface with which to interact. The probability that a solute molecule will interact with one particular type of surface will be statistically controlled by the proportion of the total surface area that is covered by that particular solvent. 

Interactions in the stationary phase employing a porous stationary phase or support must also involve the mobile phase trapped in a static form inside the pores. It follows that the diffusivity of the solute in the stationary phase (Ds) will be similar to that in the mobile phase (Dm). Thus, to a first approximation, it can be assumed that Ds = coDm, where (co) is a constant probably close to unity. Thus, equation... 

The mobile phase used was 2% tetrahydrofuran (THF) in a mixture of 30% methanol and 70% water. This is an interesting example of the use of a small quantity of THF to increase the dispersive character of the mobile phase while maintaining the high polarity of the methanol water mixture. To achieve the same increase in dispersive interactions by increasing the methanol content would probably require as much as 40-45% methanol. At this concentration the polarity of the mobile phase would have drastically changed and the selectivity of the system for the more polar materials probably lost. It is also seen that the overall sensitivity of the system is high, components being present at a level of about 100 ng. 

The mass spectrometer is also incompatible with the HPLC system, but for a different reason. The ordinary mass spectrometer operates under very low pressure (a high vacuum see Chapter 10), and thus the liquid detection path must rapidly convert from a very high pressure and large liquid volume to a very low pressure and a gaseous state. Several approaches to this problem have been used, but probably the most popular is the thermospray (TS) technique. In this technique, the column effluent is converted to a fine mist (spray) as it passes through a small-diameter heated nozzle. The analyte molecules, which must be thermally stable, are preionized with the presence of a dissolved salt. A portion of the spray is introduced into the mass spectrometer. The analyte and mobile phase must be polar if the TS technique is used because the mobile phase must dissolve the required salt and the components must interact with the analyte molecule. See Workplace Scene 13.5. 

The nature of the analyte interactions with liophilic ions could be electrostatic attraction, ion association, or dispersive-type interactions. Most probably all mentioned types are present. Ion association is essentially the same as an ion-pairing used in a general form of time-dependent interionic formation with the average lifetime on the level of 10 sec in water-organic solution with dielectric constant between 30 and 40. With increase of the water content in the mobile phase, the dielectric constant increases and approaches 80 (water) this decrease the lifetime of ion-associated complexes to approximately 10 sec, which is still about four orders of magnitude longer than average molecular vibration time. 

The conditions of validity of this isotherm model are the same as those of the competitive Langmuir isotherm, ideal behavior of the mobile phase and the adsorbed layer, localized adsorption, and equal column saturation capacities of both t3q>es of sites for the two components. The excellent results obtained with a simple isotherm model in the case of enantiomers can be explained by the conjunction of several favorable circumstances [26]. The interaction energy between two enantiomeric molecules in solutions is probably very close to the interaction energy between two R or two S molecules and their interactions with achiral solvents are... 

They were the calculation of the Hildebrand solubility parameter as a function of density using tabulated thermodynamic data for carbon dioxide and Raman spectroscopy of test solutes dissolved in supercritical carbon dioxide compared to liquid solvents to evaluate solvent-solute interactions. The results of these recent approaches indicated that while the maximum solvent power of carbon dioxide is similar to that of hexane, probably somewhat higher, there is some solvent-solute interaction not found with hexane as the solvent. The limiting solvent power of carbon dioxide is resolved by choosing the alternative of a supercritical fluid mixture as the mobile phase. The component added to the supercritical fluid to increase its solvent power and/or to alter the chromatograph column is referred to as the "modifier."... 

---