Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Retention solute

In reversed-pViase chromatography (RPC), the mobile phase modulator is typically a water-miscible organic solvent, and the stationary phase is a hydrophobic adsorbent. In this case, the logarithm of solute retention factor is commonly found to be linearly related to the volume fraction of the organic solvent. [Pg.1536]

Other cases, involving an arbitrary relationship between the solute retention factor and the modulator concentration can be handled analytically using the approaches of Frey [Biotechnol. Bioeng., 35, 1055 (1990)] and Carta and Striugfield []. Chromatogr, 605, 151 (1992)]. [Pg.1536]

Solute equilibrium parameters (X5,S for RPC and (Xz,Z for lEC Solute retention factor for initial mobile phase A ... [Pg.1537]

Algebraic Comptttation This method starts with calculation of the quantities and compositions of all the terminal streams, using a convenient quantity of one of the streams as the basis of calculation. Material balance and stream compositions are then computed for a terminal ideal stage at either end of an extraction battery (i.e., at Point A or Point B in Fig. 18-81), using equilibrium and solution-retention data. Calculations are repeated for each successive ideal stage from one end of the system to the other until an ideal stage which corresponds to the desired conditions is obtained. Any solid-hquid extraction problem can be solved by this method. [Pg.1677]

There are two fundamental chromatography theories that deal with solute retention and solute dispersion and these are the Plate Theory and the Rate Theory, respectively. It is essential to be familiar with both these theories in order to understand the chromatographic process, the function of the column, and column design. The first effective theory to be developed was the plate theory, which revealed those factors that controlled chromatographic retention and allowed the... [Pg.4]

Once the elution-curve equation is derived, and the nature of f(v) identified, then by differentiating f(v) and equating to zero, the position of the peak maximum can be determined and an expression for the retention volume (Vr) obtained. The expression for (Vr) will disclose those factors that control solute retention. [Pg.19]

Equation (34) is generally quite correct and useful. However, if highly accurate retention measurements are important, then second order effects must be taken into account and equation (33) indicates that, for accurate data, equation (34) is grossly over simplified. From equation (33), a more accurate expression for solute retention would be... [Pg.36]

Summarizing, the greater the forces between the molecules, the greater the energy (enthalpy) contribution, the larger the distribution coefficient, and the greater the retention. Conversely, any reduction in the random nature of the molecules or any increase in the amount of order in the system reduces the distribution coefficient and attenuates the retention. In chromatography, the standard enthalpy and standard entropy oppose one another in their effects on solute retention. Experimentally it has... [Pg.53]

The standard free energy can be divided up in two ways to explain the mechanism of retention. First, the portions of free energy can be allotted to specific types of molecular interaction that can occur between the solute molecules and the two phases. This approach will be considered later after the subject of molecular interactions has been discussed. The second requires that the molecule is divided into different parts and each part allotted a portion of the standard free energy. With this approach, the contributions made by different parts of the solvent molecule to retention can often be explained. This concept was suggested by Martin [4] many years ago, and can be used to relate molecular structure to solute retention. Initially, it is necessary to choose a molecular group that would be fairly ubiquitous and that could be used as the first building block to develop the correlation. The methylene group (CH2) is the... [Pg.54]

It is seen that by taking a mean value for the slope, there is very little divergence between the calculated and experimental values. Consequently, the methylene groups can, indeed, be taken as a reference group for assessing the effect of molecular structure on solute retention. The concept will now be applied to a simple n-alkanes series as discussed above, the data for which was obtained on the stationary phase n-heptadecane. [Pg.56]

This procedure will show how it is possible to identify the difference between the contribution of the methylene group and methyl group to solute retention and to show how any differences that occur might be explained. The curves for log(V r(T))... [Pg.57]

Different portions of the standard free energy of distribution can he allotted to different parts of a molecule and, thus, their contribution to solute retention can be disclosed. In addition, from the relative values of the standard enthalpy and standard entropy of each portion or group, the nianner in which the different groups interact with the stationary phase may also be revealed. [Pg.61]

Molecular interactions are the result of intermolecular forces which are all electrical in nature. It is possible that other forces may be present, such as gravitational and magnetic forces, but these are many orders of magnitude weaker than the electrical forces and play little or no part in solute retention. It must be emphasized that there are three, and only three, different basic types of intermolecular forces, dispersion forces, polar forces and ionic forces. All molecular interactions must be composites of these three basic molecular forces although, individually, they can vary widely in strength. In some instances, different terms have been introduced to describe one particular force which is based not on the type of force but on the strength of the force. Fundamentally, however, there are only three basic types of molecular force. [Pg.63]

This is one approach to the explanation of retention by polar interactions, but the subject, at this time, remains controversial. Doubtless, complexation can take place, and probably does so in cases like olefin retention on silver nitrate doped stationary phases in GC. However, if dispersive interactions (electrical interactions between randomly generated dipoles) can cause solute retention without the need to invoke the... [Pg.76]

From the point of view of solute interaction with the structure of the surface, it is now very complex indeed. In contrast to the less polar or dispersive solvents, the character of the interactive surface will be modified dramatically as the concentration of the polar solvent ranges from 0 to l%w/v. However, above l%w/v, the surface will be modified more subtly, allowing a more controlled adjustment of the interactive nature of the surface It would appear that multi-layer adsorption would also be feasible. For example, the second layer of ethyl acetate might have an absorbed layer of the dispersive solvent n-heptane on it. However, any subsequent solvent layers that may be generated will be situated further and further from the silica surface and are likely to be very weakly held and sparse in nature. Under such circumstances their presence, if in fact real, may have little impact on solute retention. [Pg.98]

However, the same changes in the mobile phase will also modify the interactions of the solute with the mobile phase, and the effect on solute retention can be as great or even greater than the modification of the stationary phase. Changes in the interactive character of the stationary phase usually occur at relatively low concentrations of... [Pg.105]

Concentrations of moderator at or above that which causes the surface of a stationary phase to be completely covered can only govern the interactions that take place in the mobile phase. It follows that retention can be modified by using different mixtures of solvents as the mobile phase, or in GC by using mixed stationary phases. The theory behind solute retention by mixed stationary phases was first examined by Purnell and, at the time, his discoveries were met with considerable criticism and disbelief. Purnell et al. [5], Laub and Purnell [6] and Laub [7], examined the effect of mixed phases on solute retention and concluded that, for a wide range of binary mixtures, the corrected retention volume of a solute was linearly related to the volume fraction of either one of the two phases. This was quite an unexpected relationship, as at that time it was tentatively (although not rationally) assumed that the retention volume would be some form of the exponent of the stationary phase composition. It was also found that certain mixtures did not obey this rule and these will be discussed later. In terms of an expression for solute retention, the results of Purnell and his co-workers can be given as follows,... [Pg.106]

Practically a more convenient way of expressing solute retention in terms of solvent concentration for a binary solvent mixture as the mobile phase is to use the inverse of equation (11), i.e.. [Pg.112]

The Combined Effect of Temperature and Solvent Composition on Solute Retention... [Pg.118]

The numerical constants were obtained over the temperature range of 5°C to 45°C and a concentration range of 0 to 0.5 volume fraction of ethanol inn-hexane.The effect of temperature and solvent composition on solute retention can, again, be best displayed by the use of 3-D graphs, and curves relating both temperature and solvent composition to the retention volume of the (S) enantiomer of 4-benzyl-2-oxazolidinone are shown in Figure 23. Figure 23 shows that the volume fraction of ethanol in the solvent mixture has the major impact on solute retention. [Pg.120]

The effect of temperature, although significant, is not nearly as great as that from the ethanol content and is greatest at low concentrations of the polar solvent. It is clear, that the solute retention is the least at high ethanol concentrations and high temperatures, which would provide shorter analysis times providing the selectivity of the phase system was not impaired. The combined effect of temperature and solvent composition on selectivity, however, is more complicated and to some extent... [Pg.120]

The full explanation of solute retention on silica, bonded phases or for that matter in liquid/liquid systems is still elusive and controversial. The thermodynamic approach... [Pg.139]

In contrast molecular interaction kinetic studies can explain and predict changes that are brought about by modifying the composition of either or both phases and, thus, could be used to optimize separations from basic retention data. Interaction kinetics can also take into account molecular association, either between components or with themselves, and contained in one or both the phases. Nevertheless, to use volume fraction data to predict retention, values for the distribution coefficients of each solute between the pure phases themselves are required. At this time, the interaction kinetic theory is as useless as thermodynamics for predicting specific distribution coefficients and absolute values for retention. Nevertheless, it does provide a rational basis on which to explain the effect of mixed solvents on solute retention. [Pg.140]

LC is a limiting technique that occurs when the column outlet pressure is near ambient and we choose well-behaved liquids as our mobile phases. Our only means of adjusting solute retention (after selecting the stationary phase and the... [Pg.155]

Mobile phases with some solvating potential, such as CO2 or ammonia, are necessary in SGC. Even though this technique is performed with ambient outlet pressure, solutes can be separated at lower temperatures than in GC because the average pressure on the column is high enough that solvation occurs. Obviously, solute retention is not constant in the column, and the local values of retention factors increase for all solutes as they near the column outlet. [Pg.158]

V. L. McGuffin, C. E. Evans and S. H. Chen, Ditect examination of separation processes in liquid-cliromatography effect of temperature and pressure on solute retention , 7. Microcolumn Sep. 5 3-10 (1993). [Pg.168]

Consequently, the solutes will pass through the chromatographic system at speeds that are inversely proportional to their distribution coefficients with respect to the stationary phase. The control of solute retention by the magnitude of the solute distribution coefficient will be discussed in the next chapter. [Pg.5]


See other pages where Retention solute is mentioned: [Pg.1531]    [Pg.1536]    [Pg.1536]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.165]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.242 , Pg.379 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.421 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption solute retention

Biphenyl solute retention

Dilute polymer solutions, retention behavior

Naphthalene solute retention

Polar solutes, retention

Retention behavior of solutes

Reverse osmosis solute retention

Reversed-phase chromatography solute retention mechanisms

Solute Retention Properties

Solute inverse retentions, function

Solute retention adsorption mechanism

Solute retention displacement model

Solute retention mechanism in SEC

Solute retention on cyclodextrin silicas

The Combined Effect of Temperature and Solvent Composition on Solute Retention

The Retention Volume of a Solute

© 2024 chempedia.info