Transition metal interaction with second phases

It can also be observed from the schematic of the interactions shown in Fig. 10 that interaction zones that provide the possibility for sharing sulfur atoms by the two different phases exist. The structure of these interaction zones are crucial to understanding the interaction of sulfides with supports and promoter phases. The basal plane interaction with a second phase can be expected to be weak, but charge transfer might be expected if metal atoms are exposed on the second phase. Such an interaction would be similar to an intercalation interaction. The edge interaction will be much stronger, and here a transition zone with a possible epitaxial relationship between MoS2 and the second phase is expected. It is in this zone that we can expect to find the surface phases as described above (for example, the CoMoS phase). But in the cases described here, the surface phase becomes a line phase at the boundary between the two bulk phases. It is our belief that the detailed study of these phases represents a key area for future research in TMS catalysis. 

Present views concerning the operation mechanism of ZN catalysts are not conclusive. Cossee [288, 289] assumes that, in the first step, donor-acceptor interaction occurs between the transition metal and the monomer. A a bond is formed by the overlap of the monomer n orbital with the orbital of the transition metal. A second n bond is formed by reverse (retrodative) donation of electrons from the orbital of the transition metal into the antibonding 7T orbital of the monomer. In the following phase, a four-centre transition complex is formed with subsequent monomer insertion into the metal-carbon bond. This, in principle, monometallic concept is criticized by the advocates of the necessary presence of a further metal in the active centre. According to them, the centre is bimetallic. Monometallic centres undoubtedly exist on the other hand, technically important ZN catalysts are multicomponent systems in which each component has its specific and non-negligible function in active centre formation. The non-transition metal in these centres is their inherent component, and most probably the centre is bimetallic. Even present ideas concerning the structural difference in centres producing isotactic and atactic polymers are not united. 

A second example involves the adsorption of ethylene on transition metal surfaces and offers an interesting challenge, in that it can bind via n or di-o adsorption modes. Complete structural optimizations were performed for ethylene in both coordination geometries (Fig. 3). In the 7t-mode, the TZ orbital on ethylene interacts with the dz orbital on the metal center. There is a backdonation of electron density into the antibonding 7C orbital of ethylene which leads to a small weakening of the C-C bond length. This is noted by the slight increase (0.05 A) in the C-C bond from the gas phase value 1.34A. There is considerably more backdonation of electron... 

The Li atoms in LiMOg (M = Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni) phases, and their respective solid solutions, may interact with transition metal ions in the first and second cation coordination shells. These interactions are termed the 90° and 180° interactions, respectively, and are named according to the angle of the M-O-Li bond. In the discussion of the shift mechanisms, the labeling conventions used by Carlier et al. will be employed [31]. The 3d atomic orbitals of a metal in an ideal octahedral site... 

Similar difficulties exist for mixed-metal systems when anisotropic structures are present and are further complicated by the presence of the second phase. The second metal, generally a first-row transition metal such as Co, affects the morphology by increasing the stacking of the M0S2 layers giving another indication of the interaction of the Co with the layers. 

The promotional effect of first-row transition metal on the activity of molybdenum-based catalysts has also been correlated with a similar activity parameter suggesting that the interaction between the Mo 4d electrons and the 3d electrons of the second metal is required (86). This interaction occurs through an electronic transfer between the two metals at a site existing near the surface or interface of the two relevant phases (Fig. 5). In octahedral coordination, the calculation showed that Co and Ni had the property to transfer electrons to Mo whereas, inversely, Cu and Cr had the property to attract electrons from Mo. The other metals did not transfer or attract electrons to or from Mo. 

Much of the available thermodynamic data, snch as bond dissociation energies, gas-phase acidities and basicities, and heats of formation for ions and neutral target species, has been determined nsing TCID [37, 38]. These data inclnde a variety of metals (alkalis, magnesitrm, altrmintrm, and first and second row transition metals), and many types of target molectrles. For instance, Armentront [39] stndied an abso-Inte cation affinity scale, thermochemistry of alkali-metal cation interactions with histidine,and host-gnest interactions of crown ethers with alkali ions nsing TCID. 

Fig. 2.1 (a) The a donation OC metal here, the transition metal d 2 orbital is shown as the acceptor but it could be some mixture of s, and d 2. Note that there is lone-pair a electron density on both 0 and C. That on C is the larger and so has the greater overlap with the empty metal orbital. In this, and all other figures in this chapter, filled orbitals are shaded the phases of orbitals are given explicitly, (b) The % back-donation metal - CO the metal orbital is almost pure d, the CO orbital is an empty antibonding % orbital. Note that for a linear triatomic OCM system there is second, equivalent, interaction to that shown above (it is like that shown but rotated 90 about the OCM axis and so is located above and below the plane of the paper). 

---