Pesticide regulatory

The definitions of method detection and quantification limits should be reliable and applicable to a variety of extraction procedures and analytical methods. The issue is of particular importance to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and also pesticide regulatory and health agencies around the world in risk assessment. The critical question central to risk assessment is assessing the risk posed to a human being from the consumption of foods treated with pesticides, when the amount of the residue present in the food product is reported nondetect (ND) or no detectable residues . 

Harmonization of Environmental Chemistry and Fate Data Requirements Under NAFTA, Regulatory Proposal PRO 2001-02, Health Canada, Pesticide Regulatory Management Agency. Also available on the World Wide Web http //www.hc-sc.gc.ca/pmra-arla/english/pdf/pro/pro2001-02-e.pdf. 

Methods submitted include single- and multi-analyte methods for parent compounds and for degradates of concern. Pesticide regulatory methods are needed for each type of environmental matrix fate methods may be designed for soil, water, plant tissue, animal tissue or air, but are predominantly for soil and water. Analytical methods need to include a complete description of the procedure, materials and equipment in order to be completely reproducible. The methods should be practical and rapid and, to the extent possible while maintaining other quality objectives, inexpensive (often State and local regulatory agencies with few available resources need to utilize them). 

In addition to pesticide regulatory monitoring programs by the FDA and USDA, individual states have also developed monitoring programs. One such state is California, which analyzed more than 67,000 food samples for pesticide residues between 1989 and 1998. Pesticide residues were detected in 31% of approximately 66,000 samples for which no market claim was made, and in 7% of the 1097 samples claimed to be organic (Baker et al., 2002). 

Benfenati E. (ed.) (2006) Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes, Elsevier, Amsterdam. 

Surfactants are used primarily as inert ingredients of pesticides, especially in agricultural applications. These surfactants usually have TSCA as well as inert pesticidal regulatory status in the US. Some surfactants are active components in pesticides. For example, the cationic surfactants benzalkonium chloride and didecyl ammonium chloride and their various derivatives are registered as active ingredients in disinfectant products with many household and industrial applications. 

As many studies submitted to pesticide regulatory jurisdictions use in vivo methodologies, but an increasing number of studies employ in vitro techniques, this section addresses data interpretation challenges with both study types. Discussion... 

Microbial pesticides are evaluated for toxicity and infectivity prior to making regulatory decisions. As traditional dose-response-based risk assessments are not considered appropriate for microbial pesticides, regulatory jurisdictions do not typically require occupational and bystander exposure data. However, a small number of studies have monitored airborne concentrations (colony forming units/m ) of microbial pesticides following application (Teschke et al 2001), and the utility of these data should be considered by the regulatory community. 

On December 2, 1970, President Nixon created the EPA. Under the President s reorganization plan the EPA assumed the pesticide regulatory functions of the USDA and the Pood and Drug Administration (PDA) under PIPRA and the FFDCA. 

In conclusion, strategies aimed at optimising pesticide use can be said to epitomise a pragmatic approach. In a simplified diagram of the pesticide regulatory approvals process (Figure 1.3), the subjects covered in this book cover the how, when and why area. These considerations form an integral part of the approvals process and the post-approval, iterative reassessment of chemicals and practices. 

OPP contacts the appropriate state pesticide regulatory authorities to ensure that they are aware of the proposal and to discuss EPA s assessment. These contacts ensure that the actions of EPA and the state agencies are as consistent as possible. OPP also notifies the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the USDA so that they can determine whether any aspect of the proposed experiment falls within APHIS jurisdiction and, if so, to avoid duplicative or conflicting assessments. 

The discipline of pesticide metabolism chemistry, as well as other disciplines involved in the toxicological evaluation of pesticides, will no doubt be required to become even more responsive to pesticide regulatory agencies in the future. 

The Federal pesticide regulatory laws pose particular, even unique challenges within the broad spectrum of public policy decisions which EPA must take. The science of toxicology plays a leading role in that decision-making process. 

---