Objectives, risk assessment

Food Control. 1990-. Amsterdam Elsevier (0956-7135). Online ScienceDirect. Covers research in all aspects of food safety, such as microbial food safety and antimicrobial systems, mycotoxins, hazard analysis, HACCP and food safety objectives, risk assessment, including microbial risk assessment, quality assurance and control, food packaging and rapid methods of analysis and detection, including sensor technology. 

CG and VR can be used to visualize more than real-world objects. Visual indicators of abstract data provide a powerful medium for learning about concepts or ideas. Where these ideas relate to measurement of risk, the visualization tools can be instrumental in assessing risk within the workplace (Hollands et al. 1999). One of the most difficult parts of objective risk assessment is obtaining a numerical measure for risk. AIMS has experimented with a number of different methods for assessing risk in mining environments (McClamon et al. 1995). 

In May 1988, a Level-1 PSA was undertaken as part of the general risk assessment at DOE facilities. Revision 0 was completed, and reviewed by BNL, DOE and contractors. The revised report was available July 1990 (Azarm, 1990). The broad objective of the HFBR PRA program is to enhance the safety and operational activities throughout the. remaining lifetime of the reactor... 

The objective of consequence analysis is to evaluate the safety (or quality) consequences to the system of any human errors that may occur. Consequence Analysis obviously impacts on the overall risk assessment within which the human reliability analysis is embedded. In order to address this issue, it is necessary to consider the nature of the consequences of human error in more detail. 

The Rijnmond area is that part of the Rhine delta between Rotterdam and the North Sea. The Commission for the Safety of the Population at large (COVO) commissioned the study for six chemicals and the operations associated with them acrylonitrile, liquid ammonia, liquid chlorine, LNG, propylene, and part of a separation process (diethanolamine stripper of a hydrodesulfurizer). The study objectives were to evaluate methods of risk assessment and obtain experience with practical applications of these methods. The results were to be used to decide to what extent such methods can be used in formulating safety policy. The study was not concerned with the acceptability of risk or the acceptability of risk reducing measures. 

A fault tree is a grapliic teclmique used to analyze complex systems. The objective is to spotlight conditions tliat cause a system to fail. Fault tree analysis attempts to describe how and why an accident or otlier undesirable event lias occurred. It may also be used to describe how and why an accident or otlier undesirable event could take place. Thus fault tree analysis finds wide application in hazard analysis and risk assessment of process and plant systems. ... 

In environmental risk assessment, the objective is to establish the likelihood of a chemical (or chemicals) expressing toxicity in the natural environment. Assessment is based on a comparison of ecotoxicity data from laboratory tests with estimated or measured exposure in the field. The question of effects at the level of population that may be the consequence of such toxicity is not addressed. This issue will now be discussed. 

While these objectives for method sensitivity may seem ambitious, experience has shown that data from such studies are much more usable for supporting fate and transport models (development and/or validation efforts) that may have to be used when more precise and geographically detailed probabilistic risk assessments become necessary. 

The major objective of this presentation is to illustrate how an environmental risk assessment of a chemical can be made using mathematical models which are available at the present time. CGA-72662, a CIBA-GEIGY insect growth inhibitor, is used as an example to show how a risk assessment can be carried out using the SWRRB runoff model coupled to the EXAMS fate model. 

This last outcome was the starting point for the work to be done during the second part of the project. At this point, the different work packages focused on their topics, that is, in environmental fate, toxicology, risk assessment, life cycle assessment, and socioeconomic issues. The objective was to apply the different methodologies related to these fields of knowledge to the selected substances in order to assess the potential risk that they can pose to the human health and the environment. 

For human health risk assessment, it is necessary to elaborate realistic scenarios. Knowledge of real scenarios where the contaminant is emitted to the environment will help to obtain information about the fate and transport of the contaminant once emitted to the environment and the route of exposure for the human beings living in this scenario of concern. There are different types of exposure, i.e., direct, indirect (as is the case of food contaminated by the air, water, or soil contaminated by the emission), occupational exposure, and consumer goods coming from outside the scenario of concern. Depending on the objective of the study, it will be necessary to consider in the exposure assessment one or more types of exposure. 

Dosimetric Studies. The main objective of Rn-d dosimetry is to enable the assessment of the observed dose from Rn-d deposited in the respiratory tract from measured Rn-d concentration in the atmosphere. As a consequence of an inhomogeneous Rn-d deposition within the lung, different dosimetric concepts have been developed to describe either regional mean dose values (e.g. for tracheobronchial or pulmonary region) or microdosimetric dose calculations (e.g. for the basal cell layer). Using Monte Carlo calculation methods it is also possible to account for the random nature of cellular hits by deposited alpha particles. The results of such dosimetric calculations should provide the following information needed for Rn-d risk assessment ... 

A special assessment procedure that aims at tackling uncertain consequences of human activities is called risk assessment (RA). The main objective of risk assessment is to use the best available information and knowledge for identifying hazards, estimating the risks and making recommendations for risk management (World Bank, 1997). 

Traditionally, RA has been focused on threats to humans posed by industrial pollutants. In recent times there has been a shift to other types of hazards and affected objects (Carpenter, 1996). Ecological risk assessment (EcoRA) has already evolved into separate methodology under the general RA framework. 

Island/Thurrock Area, HMSO, London, 1978. Rasmussen, Reactor Safety Study An Assessment of Accident Risk in U. S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, WASH-1400 NUREG 75/014, Washington, D.C., 1975. Rijnmond Public Authority, A Risk Analysis of 6 Potentially Hazardous Industrial Objects in the Rijnmond Area—A Pilot Study, D. Reidel, Boston, 1982. Considine, The Assessment of Individual and Societal Risks, SRD Report R-310, Safety and Reliability Directorate, UKAEA, Warrington, 1984. Baybutt, Uncertainty in Risk Analysis, Conference on Mathematics in Major Accident Risk Assessment, University of Oxford, U.K., 1986. 

An obvious and all-important aspect of Section 8 is that it is a mechanism to facilitate the acquisition of information that EPA needs. Accordingly, the proper test of EPA s performance under Section 8 is not the amount of information that EPA acquires or the number of companies required to report, but the Agency s success in building a data-base for accomplishing its specific risk assessment, testing and chemical control responsibilities under Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 of TSCA. In view of this purpose, it was of great concern that EPA has repeatedly failed to define carefully, and then articulate fully, the connection between a proposal under Section 8, and a specific regulatory objective under some other provision of TSCA. 

The goal of assessing risk is to build on the knowledge of chemical reactivity hazards, to understand how the hazard properties may lead to loss scenarios in the facility context, and to determine whether existing safeguards are adequate. Therefore, the assessment of risk can be performed at any stage of facility design, development, operation, or alteration. Of course, the more that is known about the facility and its equipment and operation, the more detailed the risk assessment can be. Methods used to determine chemical reaction risks are varied, as are their objectives and data requirements. 

The first edition1 of this book was published approximately 13 years ago. Its primary objective was to present an overview and a "roadmap" of the process of new drug discovery and development, particularly oriented to individuals or companies entering the pharmaceutical field. It was written by one of the authors (Smith), with no contributors, and drawn on Smith s experiences in the industry and field over the course of nearly 40 years. In the second edition, the scope of the first book has been expanded and technical details in the form of hard data have been included. In addition to the editors own commentary and contributions, the major part of the book is the result of contributions of experts in the industry. New chapters on risk assessment, international harmonization of drug development and regulation, dietary supplements, patent law, and entrepreneurial startup of a new pharmaceutical company have been added. Some of the important, basic operational aspects of drug discovery and development (e.g., organizational matters, staff requirements, pilot plant operations, etc.) are not repeated in this book but can be found in the first edition. 

---