Multi-level calibration

Multi-level calibration Linear, point to point, cubic spline, inverse linear, log-log linear, quadratic, cubic, fourth-order, and fifth-order. 

Calibration curves must be made from chemicals with the highest purity as possible. To avoid dilution errors a multi-level calibration curve (six points) based on three stock solutions is recommended. One must also be aware that low concentrations of for example, PAHs (2 ppm) may be adsorbed by the vials up to -90% (Pinto, Jose and Cordero, 1994). A calibrated and traceable balance or a traceable pipette must be used for accurate preparation and dilution of the standards. The calibration curve must cover the concentration range that is needed for the analysis. Both the slope and the intercept must be used to calculate the concentration in the sample, especially if the intercept is different from zero. 

Metals were analyzed using dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) on a SPECTRACE 6000. 2 g of sample were used. For metals in char multi-level calibrations within a range of 10-20,000 ppm were carried out. For the liquid samples the range was set between 1 and 10,000 ppm. 

Considering the related Mettler DL 40 and DL 40 RC MemoTitrators, the DL 40 can be used for ten different volumetric and potentiometric methods titration to a pre-selected absolute (EPA) or relative (EPR) end-point equilibrium titration (EQU)-recording titration (REC)-incremental titration (INC) Karl Fischer water determination (KF)-controlled dispensing (DOSE) pH and pX measurements (pX/E) multi-level titrations and back-titrations with automatic calculation (CALC) and manual titration (MAN)-automatic calibration of electrodes (CAL). 

As shown in the Level column of Figure 10, the various injected volumes can be designated as individual component calibration levels. By doing this, experiments 10-27 can also be used to help validate multilevel, multi-replicate calibration algorithms on a chromatographic data system. 

The quantification is based on multi level response factors covering both differences in extraction behaviour, volatility and GC/MS response of the compounds and of the deuterated internal standards. 1 Utre pentane washed water is spiked with 50 pg deuterated internal standards and normally 1,5,25 and 100 pg of the different target compounds. Calibration curves are automatically calculated and stored on the disk, and quantification is based on area of ion chromatogram of one specific mass for each compoimd. 

Calibration data (e.g., linearity or sensitivity) are not discussed in detail between laboratories, but a typical calibration starts with 50% of the lowest fortification level and requires at least three additional calibration levels. Another point of calibration is the use of appropriate standards. In 1999 a collaborative study tested the effect of matrix residues in final extracts on the GC response of several pesticides.Five sample extracts (prepared for all participants in one laboratory using the German multi-residue procedure) and pure ethyl acetate were fortified with several pesticides. The GC response of all pesticides in all extracts was determined and compared with the response in the pure solvent. In total, 20 laboratories using 47 GC instruments... 

If analytical methods are validated in inter-laboratory validation studies, documentation should follow the requirements of the harmonized protocol of lUPAC. " However, multi-matrix/multi-residue methods are applicable to hundreds of pesticides in dozens of commodities and have to be validated at several concentration levels. Any complete documentation of validation results is impossible in that case. Some performance characteristics, e.g., the specificity of analyte detection, an appropriate calibration range and sufficient detection sensitivity, are prerequisites for the determination of acceptable trueness and precision and their publication is less important. The LOD and LOQ depend on special instmmentation, analysts involved, time, batches of chemicals, etc., and cannot easily be reproduced. Therefore, these characteristics are less important. A practical, frequently applied alternative is the publication only of trueness (most often in terms of recovery) and precision for each analyte at each level. No consensus seems to exist as to whether these analyte-parameter sets should be documented, e.g., separately for each commodity or accumulated for all experiments done with the same analyte. In the latter case, the applicability of methods with regard to commodities can be documented in separate tables without performance characteristics. 

The introduction of EU directives on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Reduction of Hazardous Substances has highlighted the need for precise and repeatable elemental analysis of heavy metals in the plastics production process. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy has emerged as the most economical and effective analytical tool for achieving this. A set of certified standards, known as TOXEL, is now available to facilitate XRF analyses in PE. Calibration with TOXEL standards is simplified by the fact that XRF is a multi-element technique. Therefore a single set of the new standards can be used to calibrate several heavy elements, covering concentrations from trace level to several hundred ppm. This case study is the analysis of heavy metals in PE using an Epsilon 5 XRF spectrometer. 

Sensors of this type were constructed as multi-electrode arrays bearing chohnesterases of differing sensitivity to organo-phosphates, and the assay extended to milk [35]. Both spiked milk and milk from shops inhibited the activity of the electrodes. In two instances, estimates of the level of organo-phosphates in spiked milk made using sensors were very close to those made using GC-MS. This appears to have been a fortunate co-incidence as the response curves used for calibration were not linear. Nine out of ten milk samples from shops inhibited at least some members of the array. In only one case did the GC-MS assay find insecticides in the samples, but the insecticides were not organo-phosphates. The inhibition shown by the enzyme-based arrays was reversible by pyridine-2-aldoxime... 

ICP-AES offers rapid, multi-element determinations. Its sensitivity is lower than that of either ICP-MS or AA-GTA, but it can handle higher levels of total dissolved solids than ICP-MS and is much faster than AA-GTA. The results obtained are in comparison with all the equipment used by about 100 laboratories that are participating in the Environmental Laboratory Approval Program. The quality of the performance relating to equipment as well as the analyst in such international collaborative programs implies the use of certified reference materials for calibration and control samples to ensure a certain level of traceability of the measurements and finally the degree of assurance of reliability. 

The production of the API and finished dosage form is required to comply with GMP regulations discussed in Chapter 9 and Section 10.2. The quality system, quality control and validation of equipment and processes have to be developed and adhered to in the manufacturing process. Proper records and documentation are required to be kept in the forms of batch records, test records and manufacturing procedures. Reaction vessels and associated equipment must be calibrated, validated and cleaned to acceptable levels before being used this is especially the case for multi-product plants where more than one API is manufactured. 

It is well documented in the literature that NIR calibration curves for multi-component formulations should be assembled by scanning standards which contain all of the components varying the level of only one component in each sample. The relative contributions of each of the components may vaiy considerably as is illustrated in the following test data. 

Abstract Heavy elements inevitably contaminate the effluents from surface finishing industries. Determination of the elements is important to estimate the level of contamination and thus proceeds for treatment of the effluents. We offer two types of instmments ICP-AES, and ICP-MS for determination of the elements. The atomic absorption spectrometer requires an individual lamp for each element to be determined, whereas the ICP-MS offers multi-elemental analysis. For both, ICP-AES and ICP-MS, the apparatus required is to be cleaned in 5 % sodium hydroxide, 5 % nitric acid, and ultrapure water sequentially. Samples of effluents are taken in clean bottles, previously washed three times. All reagents and water are purchased at the ultrapure level. Standard solutions are also bought commercially, and appropriate dilutions are prepared for ICP-AES or ICP-MS. Measurements of the concentration of elements by using the ICP-AES and ICP-MS are repeated at least three times and a blank is checked simultaneously. A calibration line is calculated using 3 or 4 standard solutions and r (the slope) is ascertained, which should be near 1 to achieve accurate determinations. The concentration of elements is calculated from the calibration line and errors are estimated. 

While, from a general measurement point of view a two point calibration is probably acceptable, there are situations where this might not be so. At the nuclear level, energies are very precisely defined (see Chapter 1, Section 1.6.4), and studies of these levels might require a much greater degree of accuracy. A multi-point nonlinear calibration would then be needed of a mathematical form chosen to reflect the shape of the non-linearity. The most obvious first choice might be a quadratic function ... 

---