Methyl acetate processes

Eastman chemical engineers provided innovative solutions to key steps in the methyl acetate process. Computer simulations were used extensively to test ways to minimize the size of the reactors and recycle streams, to maximize yields and conversions, and to refine the methyl acetate in a minimum number of steps. 

Case E Eastman Chemical Methyl Acetate Process (Siirola, 1995, 1998). In the commercial operation of the Eastman methyl acetate process, many reaction and separation functions are combined in one single large column (a few meters in diameter and 80 meters high (38). The number of pieces of major equipment compared to a conventional design is reduced by a factor of 10 (36). The primary energy consumption and capital expenditure is reduced by a factor of 5 (38). 

One way to simplify processes is to eliminate equipment, by combining reaction and separation. The use of membranes is discussed in Chapter 4. Another relevant example is reactive distillation. Figure 1.16 compares the traditional methyl acetate process with that based on reactive distillation (Eastman Chemical) [97-99]. Eastman... 

Chemical Co. s methyl acetate reactive distillation process and processes for the synthesis of fuel ethers are classic success stories in reactive distillation. Improvements for the Eastman process are very high five-times lower investment and five-times lower energy use than the traditional process. However, combining reaction and distillation is not always advantageous and in some cases it may not even be feasible. The methyl acetate process based on reactive distillation has fewer vessels, pumps, flanges, valves, piping and instruments. This is an advantage also in terms of safety and maintenance. However, a reactive distillation column itself is more complex (multiple unit operations occur within one vessel) and thus more difficult to control and operate. It is thus not possible to make unique conclusions. 

Example 2 Revamp of the methyl acetate process by the Eastman Chemical Company is a classic case of revamps and process intensification [62]. The earlier process had one reactor and 9 distillation and extraction columns. These were replaced with a single reactive distillation column. Though it falls under reactive distillation, the process integration is somewhat specific to the components involved. 

Process simplification the potential for capital cost reduction is clear in that RD can remove the need for separate reaction and separation steps. Prior to use of RD, for example, the methyl acetate process required two reactors and eight distillation columns. It has been succeeded by systems containing one RD column and two separating columns (Agreda et al., 1990), with a significant reduction in overall capital cost. 

For example, suppose we wished to produce acetic acid and methanol from methyl acetate and water (the reverse of the methyl acetate process). Now the reactant methyl acetate is the lightest, and it would be very difficult to keep it in the reactive zone and not have much of it escape into the distillate with the methanol that is being produced. This process would not be suitable for reactive distillation. 

Ethyl acetate. Use 58 g. (73-5 ml.) of absolute ethyl alcohol, 225 g. of glacial acetic acid and 3 g. of concentrated sulphuric acid. Reflux for 6-12 hours. Work up as for n-propyl acetate. B.p. 76- 77°. Yield 32 g. Much ethyl acetate is lost in the washing process. A better yield may be obtained, and most of the excess of acetic acid may be recovered, by distilhng the reaction mixture through an efficient fractionating column and proceeding as for methyl acetate. 

Acetylation of acetaldehyde to ethyUdene diacetate [542-10-9], a precursor of vinyl acetate, has long been known (7), but the condensation of formaldehyde [50-00-0] and acetic acid vapors to furnish acryflc acid [97-10-7] is more recent (30). These reactions consume relatively more energy than other routes for manufacturing vinyl acetate or acryflc acid, and thus are not likely to be further developed. Vapor-phase methanol—methyl acetate oxidation using simultaneous condensation to yield methyl acrylate is still being developed (28). A vanadium—titania phosphate catalyst is employed in that process. 

Synthesis gas is obtained either from methane reforming or from coal gasification (see Coal conversion processes). Telescoping the methanol carbonylation into an esterification scheme furnishes methyl acetate directly. Thermal decomposition of methyl acetate yields carbon and acetic anhydride,... 

The first anhydride plant in actual operation using methyl acetate carbonylation was at Kingsport, Tennessee (41). A general description has been given (42) indicating that about 900 tons of coal are processed daily in Texaco gasifiers. Carbon monoxide is used to make 227,000 t/yr of anhydride from 177,000 t/yr of methyl acetate 166,000 t/yr of methanol is generated. Infrared spectroscopy has been used to foUow the apparent reaction mechanism (43). 

By selection of appropriate operating conditions, the proportion of coproduced methanol and dimethyl ether can be varied over a wide range. The process is attractive as a method to enhance production of Hquid fuel from CO-rich synthesis gas. Dimethyl ether potentially can be used as a starting material for oxygenated hydrocarbons such as methyl acetate and higher ethers suitable for use in reformulated gasoline. Also, dimethyl ether is an intermediate in the Mobil MTG process for production of gasoline from methanol. 

The Eastman acetic anhydride [108-24-7] process provides an extension of carbonylation chemistry to carboxyUc acid esters. The process is based on technology developed independendy in the 1970s by Eastman and Halcon SD. The Eastman acetic anhydride process involves carbonylation of methyl acetate [79-20-9] produced from coal-derived methanol and acetic acid [64-19-7]. 

The Eastman Chemicals from Coal faciUty is a series of nine complex interrelated plants. These plants include air separation, slurry preparation, gasification, acid gas removal, sulfur recovery, CO /H2 separation, methanol, methyl acetate, and acetic anhydride. A block flow diagram of the process is shown in Eigure 3. The faciUty covers an area of 2.2 x 10 (55 acres) at Eastman s main plant site in Kingsport, Teimessee. The air separation plant is... 

The chemical complex includes the methanol plant, methyl acetate plant, and acetic anhydride plant. The methanol plant uses the Lurgi process for hydrogenation of CO over a copper-based catalyst. The plant is capable of producing 165,000 t/yr of methanol. The methyl acetate plant converts this methanol, purchased methanol, and recovered acetic acid from other Eastman processes into approximately 440,000 t/yr of methyl acetate. 

The acetic anhydride process employs a homogeneous rhodium catalyst system for reaction of carbon monoxide with methyl acetate (36). The plant has capacity to coproduce approximately 545,000 t/yr of acetic anhydride, and 150,000 t/yr of acetic acid. One of the many challenges faced in operation of this plant is recovery of the expensive rhodium metal catalyst. Without a high recovery of the catalyst metal, the process would be uneconomical to operate. 

This process is one of the three commercially practiced processes for the production of acetic anhydride. The other two are the oxidation of acetaldehyde [75-07-0] and the carbonylation of methyl acetate [79-20-9] in the presence of a rhodium catalyst (coal gasification technology, Halcon process) (77). The latter process was put into operation by Tennessee Eastman in 1983. In the United States the total acetic anhydride production has been reported to be in the order of 1000 metric tons. 

The high cost of coal handling and preparation and treatment of effluents, compounded by continuing low prices for cmde oil and natural gas, has precluded significant exploitation of coal as a feedstock for methanol. A small amount of methanol is made from coal in South Africa for local strategic reasons. Tennessee Eastman operates a 195,000-t/yr methanol plant in Tennessee based on the Texaco coal gasification process to make the methyl acetate intermediate for acetic anhydride production (15). 

A related but distinct rhodium-catalyzed methyl acetate carbonylation to acetic anhydride (134) was commercialized by Eastman in 1983. Anhydrous conditions necessary to the Eastman acetic anhydride process require important modifications (24) to the process, including introduction of hydrogen to maintain the active [Rhl2(CO)2] catalyst and addition of lithium cation to activate the alkyl methyl group of methyl acetate toward nucleophilic attack by iodide. 

An analogue of the transesterification process has also been demonstrated, in which the diacetate of BPA is transesterified with dimethyl carbonate, producing polycarbonate and methyl acetate (33). Removal of the methyl acetate from the equihbrium drives the reaction to completion. Methanol carbonylation, transesterification using phenol to diphenyl carbonate, and polymerization using BPA is commercially viable. The GE plant is the first to produce polycarbonate via a solventiess and phosgene-free process. 

In an integrated continuous process, cellulose reacts with acetic anhydride prepared from the carbonylation of methyl acetate with carbon monoxide. The acetic acid Hberated reacts further with methanol to give methyl acetate, which is then carbonylated to give additional acetic anhydride (100,101). 

The manufacture of high purity methyl acetate by a reactive distillation process has been accompHshed high conversion of one reactant can be achieved only with a large excess of the other reactant. Because the reaction is reversible, the rate of reaction ia the Hquid phase is iacreased by removing methyl acetate prefereatiaHy to the other components ia the reactioa mixture (100). 

Eastman Chemical Company has operated a coal-to-methanol plant in Kingsport, Tennessee, since 1983. Two Texaco gasifiers (one is a backup) process 34 Mg/h (37 US ton/h) of coal to synthesis gas. The synthesis gas is converted to methanol by use of ICl methanol technology. Methanol is an intermediate for producing methyl acetate and acetic acid. The plant produces about 225 Gg/a (250,000 US ton/a) of acetic anhydride. As part of the DOE Clean Coal Technology Program, Air Products and Cnemicals, Inc., and Eastman Chemic Company are constructing a 9.8-Mg/h (260-US ton/d) slurry-phase reactor for the conversion of synthesis gas to methanol and dimethyl... 

Reactive distillation is a technique for combining a number of process operations in a single device. One company has developed a reactive distillation process for the manufacture of methyl acetate that reduces the number of distillation columns from eight to three, also eliminating an extraction column and a separate reactor (Agreda et al., 1990 Doherty and Buzad, 1992 Siirola, 1995). Inventory is reduced... 

The most successful example of generating chemicals directly from coal is the Tennessee Eastman integrated process for producing acetic anhydride. The commercial plant gasifies approximately 900 tons of coal per day and performs four chemical steps to yield annually 500 million pounds of acetic anhydride, 390 million pounds of methyl acetate, and 365 million pounds of methanol. In addition, 150 million pounds per year of acetic acid may be produced from acetic anhydride. 

The final step in the process involves reacting purified carbon monoxide from the gas separation plant with methyl acetate to form acetic anhydride, using a proprietary catalyst system and process. Part of the acetic anhydride is reacted with methanol to produce acetic acid and methyl acetate, and the latter is recirculated to the carbonylation step. 

---