Kinetics ohmic drop

However, under working conditions, with a current density j, the cell voltage E(j) decreases greatly as the result of three limiting factors the charge transfer overpotentials r]a,act and Pc,act at the two electrodes due to slow kinetics of the electrochemical processes (p, is defined as the difference between the working electrode potential ( j), and the equilibrium potential eq,i). the ohmic drop Rf. j, with the ohmic resistance of the electrolyte and interface, and the mass transfer limitations for reactants and products. The cell voltage can thus be expressed as... 

Separate determination of ° and k+ required additional high-scan-rate experiments able to reach the chemical reversibility of a system of the type shown in Figure 2.4a, even if the anodic and cathodic peaks are usually more distant from each other, due to the interference of electron transfer kinetics (see Figure 1.19), and possibly, ohmic drop. 

Double-layer charging current and ohmic drop are likely to interfere at high scan rates. The procedures for extracting the Faradaic component of the current and correcting the potential axis from the effect of ohmic drop described earlier (see Sections 1.3.2 and 1.4.3) should then be applied. The same is true for the double-layer effect on the electron transfer kinetics (Section 1.4.2). 

It must be emphasized again that the mid-peak potential is equal to E° for a simple, reversible redox reaction when neither any experimental artifact nor kinetic effect (ohmic drop effect, capacitive current, adsorption side reactions, etc.) occurs, and macroscopic inlaid disc electrodes are used, that is, the thickness of the diffusion layer is much higher than that of the diameter of the electrode. 

In voltammetric experiments, electroactive species in solution are transported to the surface of the electrodes where they undergo charge transfer processes. In the most simple of cases, electron-transfer processes behave reversibly, and diffusion in solution acts as a rate-determining step. However, in most cases, the voltammetric pattern becomes more complicated. The main reasons for causing deviations from reversible behavior include (i) a slow kinetics of interfacial electron transfer, (ii) the presence of parallel chemical reactions in the solution phase, (iii) and the occurrence of surface effects such as gas evolution and/or adsorption/desorption and/or formation/dissolution of solid deposits. Further, voltammetric curves can be distorted by uncompensated ohmic drops and capacitive effects in the cell [81-83]. 

This AE can be measured directly since there is no ohmic drop at t > tx. The coulostatic impulse method is, therefore, particularly suitable for kinetic studies in low-conducting media. For further details, the reader is referred to the extensive reviews of van Leeuwen [39]. 

The secondary current distribution is calculated by including the effects of the ohmic drop in the electrolyte and the effects of sluggish electrode kinetics. While the secondary distribution may be a more realistic approximation, its calculation is more difficult therefore, we need to assess the relative importance of electrode kinetics to determine whether we can neglect them in a simulation. 

Electron transfer kinetics may be more difficult to determine using stationary electrodes sweep voltammetry. Residual ohmic drop may interfere strongly with the determination of kinetics constants. Impedancemetry and RDEs provide useful alternatives and will be discussed in some detail. 

One can see from Eq. (24) that at L 3> 1, m0 D/a (as for a microdisk electrode alone), but at L -C 1, m0 D/d, which is indicative of the TLC type behavior. By decreasing d, the mass-transport rate can be increased sufficiently for quantitative characterization of fast ET kinetics, while preserving the advantages of steady-state methods, that is, the absence of problems associated with ohmic drop, adsorption, and charging current. 

There are two advantages of the coulostatic method in the study of kinetics of electrode reactions. First, the ohmic drop is not of importance, therefore the measurements can be carried out in highly resistive media. Second, since Ic = IF, Q does not interfere in the measurement. By the help of this technique jo values up to about 0.1 A cm-2 and - standard rate constants up to 0.4cms 1 can be determined. A detailed discussion of coulostatic techniques can be found in Ref. [vi]. 

In the polarization curve, three parts can be observed kinetic, ohmic, and mass transfer. In the kinetic part, the cell voltage drop is due to the charge-transfer kinetics, i.e., the 02 reduction and H2 oxidation rate at the electrode surface, which is dominated by the kinetic I-rj equation (Equation 1.37). In the ohmic part, the cell voltage drop is mainly due to the internal resistance of the fuel cell, including electrolyte membrane resistance, catalyst layer resistance, and contact resistance. In the mass transfer part, the voltage drop is due to the transfer speed of H2 and 02 to the electrode surface. 

Electroreduction and electrooxidation of salene (7V,N -bis(salicylidene)-ethyledi-amine) complexes of cobalt and copper studied by Kapturkiewicz and Behr [147] in eight aprotic solvents obey these conditions. These authors were the first to demonstrate experimentally the significant influence of the dielectric relaxation time of solvents on the electrode kinetics. They found earlier [171] that the mechanism of electrode reactions of salene complexes is independent of the solvents applied. No correlation with the prediction of the Marcus theory was found, but the kinetic data correlated well with the viscosity of the solvents and their dielectric relaxation time. However, because the ohmic drop was not well compensated, their rate constants are likely to be too low, as was shown in DMSO by Lasia and coworkers [172]. 

Kinetic data that have been obtained so far fall into three groups. The first comprises data measured without the proper ohmic drop compensation or subtraction and/or the ideal polarization of the liquid-liquid interface being considered. Thus, from kinetic measurements made by Gavach et al. [138] Buck and coworkers [121, 122], or Samec et al. [38], rather low values of the standard rate constant kl were... 

In the more advanced kinetic measurements, which were carried out by using chronopotentiometry [118], chronocoulometry [124, 139], linear [146] and convolution [18, 147] potential sweep voltammetry, or phase-sensitive ac polarography [142, 143], the ohmic drop was either numerically subtracted [118], or compensated [124, 139, 142, 143, 146, 147] with the help of the positive feedback. The feedback adjustment was based either on the assumption that the separation of the current peaks measured by the slow potential sweep voltammetry should reach the value of (59/z)mV [124, 139, 146, 147], or on the value of the solution resistance obtained by an ac bridge technique [142, 143]. However, the former adjustment is not very sensitive, whereas the estimated accuracy of 10 Q [142] in the latter case may not be... 

The peak-potential difference A p depends mainly on the kinetic parameter i/t, as illustrated in Table 2. By measurement of A p as a function of v for a given system, k° can be estimated. However, great care should be exerted to ensure that uncompensated resistance does not contribute to the value of A p, since this would hamper the procedure. Clearly, the use of ultramicroelectrodes can be recommended for this kind of measurements, as the ohmic drop is much smaller here compared to microelectrodes of normal size. This is particularly true when high sweep rates are required for determining large values of k° (see Section 2.4)... 

Although the DPSC technique with UME has some advantages over fast CV with respect to cell time constant, ohmic drop, and slow heterogeneous kinetics, the technique has rarely been used. The main reason for this is that DPSC is a blind technique, where it is difficult to distinguish between a variation in the real response and experimental artefacts such as adsorption or changes in Cji. 

When spectroelectrochemistry is used as a tool in reaction kinetics, it is important to know accurately the rate of generation of reactive intermediates, that is, the accurate potential of the working electrode. This requirement becomes a particular problem when an OTE is the preferred electrode because of the ohmic drop in the electrode itself and the nonuniform current distributions often encountered. For the OTTLEs in particular, the accurate modeling of the diffusion in the cell also leads to rather complicated mathematical equations [346]. The most profitable way of operation is therefore to use a potential-step procedure where the potential is stepped to a value at which the heterogeneous electron transfer reaction proceeds at the diffusion-controlled rate. In transmission spectroscopy the absorbance, AB(t), of the initial electrode product B, in the absence of chemical follow-up reactions, is given by Eq. (99) [347,348], where b is the extinction coefficient of B. 

The specific interest in the law (2) is due to the possibility of dealing analytically with the problem of the influence that the solution resistance exerts on the kinetics of a corrosion process. Experience has shown, in fact, that the direct determination of the mass loss of a metal in a given environment differs from the one obtained by electrochemical measurements. It should be noted, however, that the origin of this discrepancy is of a more general nature and is not only ascribable to the ohmic drop. 

Most corrosionists agree on the fact that corrosion current density is a very important parameter for the evaluation of the kinetics of a corrosion process and the proper choice of a metal to be used in a given environment with no prejudice to its integrity and performance. Hence it is very interesting to examine analytically the influence of the ohmic drop on the determination of the corrosion rate. In fact, this analysis makes it possible to detect a priori situations that may cause the behaviour of an electrochemical system to diverge from its ideal trend and render the use of equation (10) mandatory for a more reliable evaluation of the kinetics of the corrosion process. 

The points discussed so far should have shed some light on the problems associated with the processing of experimental data and shown how mistaken it may be to neglect the presence of the ohmic drop. But the assessment of the validity of a given reaction scheme for explaining the kinetic behaviour of an electrochemical system depends, above all, on the reliability of the experimental data. 

Equation (25) includes ohmic, kinetic, and concentration effects. The equation is analogous to Eq. (16) except that it is now written in terms of quantities which can be measured directly or at least isolated. Use of current interruption still yields the correct ohmic drop (if ionic concentration gradients are negligible), but the measured overpotential comprises kinetic and concentration-dependent components. 

The importance of knowing the exact value of the ohmic drop or uncompensated resistance in an electrochemical system has been pointed out by many workers. In studies of the kinetics of electrode processes by potentiostatic techniques, the ohmic potential drop produces a distortion of the steady state polarization curve which, if uncorrected, will yield erroneous values of the characteristic parameters (Tafel slope, reaction orders) of the electrode reactions (Fig. 6.2). 

The behavior of porous electrodes is considerably more complicated than that of planar electrodes because of the intimate contact between the solid and fluid phases. Reaction rates can vary widely through the depth of the electrode due to the interplay between the ohmic drop in the solid phase, kinetic resistances, and concentration variations in the fluid phases. The number and complexity of interactions occurring make it difficult to develop... 

The popularity of the cychc voltammetry (CV) technique has led to its extensive study and numerous simple criteria are available for immediate anal-j sis of electrochemical systems from the shape, position and time-behaviour of the experimental voltammograms [1, 2], For example, a quick inspection of the cyclic voltammograms offers information about the diffusive or adsorptive nature of the electrode process, its kinetic and thermodynamic parameters, as well as the existence and characteristics of coupled homogeneous chemical reactions [2]. This electrochemical method is also very useful for the evaluation of the magnitude of imdesirable effects such as those derived from ohmic drop or double-layer capacitance. Accordingly, cyclic voltammetry is frequently used for the analysis of electroactive species and surfaces, and for the determination of reaction mechanisms and rate constants. 

Thus far we have considered only the case of planar macroelectrodes. Although these are widely used for electrochemical experiments, they have some drawbacks mainly due to the distorting effects arising from their large capacitance and ohmic drop. In addition, mass transport in linear diffusion is quite inefficient such that in the case of fast homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions, the response is diffusion-limited and therefore it does not provide kinetic information. 

---