Impulse method

Microimpulse methods. Impulse methods have many shortcomings, primarily because of the considerable dissipation of energy required to produce an indentation of the sampler, this being dependent on the weight and shape of the sample, and preparatory treatment of its surface. 

The principle of a tracer experiment is the one of any common method impulse-response (Figure 4-1) injection of a tracer in the entrance of a system and a recording of the concentration-time curve at the exit. 

The equation system of eq.(6) can be used to find the input signal (for example a crack) corresponding to a measured output and a known impulse response of a system as well. This way gives a possibility to solve different inverse problems of the non-destructive eddy-current testing. Further developments will be shown the solving of eq.(6) by special numerical operations, like Gauss-Seidel-Method [4]. 

All described sensor probes scan an edge of the same material to get the characteristic step response of each system. The derivation of this curve (see eq.(4) ) causes the impulse responses. The measurement frequency is 100 kHz, the distance between sensor and structure 0. Chapter 4.2.1. and 4.2.2. compare several sensors and measurement methods and show the importance of the impulse response for the comparison. 

The following examples represent the importance of the impulse response for the comparison of different magnetic field sensors. For presentation in this paper only one data curve per method is selected and compared. The determined signals and the path x are related in the same way like in the previous chapter. 

Methods from the theory of LTI-systems are practicable for eddy-current material testing problems. The special role of the impulse response as a characteristic function of the system sensor-material is presented in the theory and for several examples. 

With this testing method an evaluation is possible within shortest time, i.e. directly after the heat impulse. The high temperature difference between a delamination and sound material is affected - among other parameters - by the thickness of the layer. Other parameters are size and stage of the delamination Generally, a high surface temperature refers to a small wall thickness and/or layer separation [4],... 

The large temperature difference of the remarkable borehole, opposite other boreholes and their environment is significant. This high temperature difference is a typical feature for a small wall thickness between borehole and blade surface. For technical reasons, precise eroding of the boreholes is difficult. Due to this, the remaining wallthickness between the boreholes and the blade surface has to be determined, in order to prevent an early failure, Siemens/Kwu developed a new method to determine the wallthickness with Impulse-Video-Thermography [5],... 

The method proposed by Papoulis [7] to determine h(t) as a function of its Fourier transform within a band, is a non-linear adaptive modification of a extrapolation method.[8] It takes advantage of the finite width of impulse responses in both time and frequency. 

In LN, the bonded interactions are treated by the approximate linearization, and the local nonbonded interactions, as well as the nonlocal interactions, are treated by constant extrapolation over longer intervals Atm and At, respectively). We define the integers fci,fc2 > 1 by their relation to the different timesteps as Atm — At and At = 2 Atm- This extrapolation as used in LN contrasts the modern impulse MTS methods which only add the contribution of the slow forces at the time of their evaluation. The impulse treatment makes the methods symplectic, but limits the outermost timestep due to resonance (see figures comparing LN to impulse-MTS behavior as the outer timestep is increased in [88]). In fact, the early versions of MTS methods for MD relied on extrapolation and were abandoned because of a notable energy drift. This drift is avoided by the phenomenological, stochastic terms in LN. 

The heightened appreciation of resonance problems, in particular, has been quite recent [63, 62], and contrasts the more systematic error associated with numerical stability that grows systematically with the discretization size. Ironically, resonance artifacts are worse in the modern impulse multiple-timestep methods, formulated to be symplectic and reversible the earlier extrapolative variants were abandoned due to energy drifts. 

This article is organized as follows Sect. 2 explains why it seems important to use symplectic integrators. Sect. 3 describes the Verlet-I/r-RESPA impulse MTS method, Sect. 4 presents the 5 femtosecond time step barrier. Sect. 5 introduce a possible solution termed the mollified impulse method (MOLLY), and Sect. 6 gives the results of preliminary numerical tests with MOLLY. 

A good place to start the discussion is the impulse method ... 

The application in [24] is to celestial mechanics, in which the reduced problem for consists of the Keplerian motion of planets around the sun and in which the impulses account for interplanetary interactions. Application to MD is explored in [14]. It is not easy to find a reduced problem that can be integrated analytically however. The choice /f = 0 is always possible and this yields the simple but effective leapfrog/Stormer/Verlet method, whose use according to [22] dates back to at least 1793 [5]. This connection should allay fears concerning the quality of an approximation using Dirac delta functions. 

The idea is illustrated by Fig. 1. These equations constitute a readily understandable and concise representation of the widely used Verlet-I/r-RESPA impulse MTS method. The method was described first in [8, 9] but tested... 

Fig. 1. Schematic for the impulse multiple time stepping method.

Fig. 3. Stability boundary for impulse method applied to the 2-spring problem. Gamma is uiAt and Delta t is At.

An instability of the impulse MTS method for At slightly less than half the period of a normal mode is confirmed by an analytical study of a linear model problem [7]. For another analysis, see [2]. A special case of this model problem, which gives a more transparent description of the phenomenon, is as follows Consider a two-degree-of-freedom system with Hamiltonian p + 5P2 + + 4( 2 This models a system of two springs con-... 

In an effort to counteract the accuracy reduction of the impulse method in a resonance situation, a modification to the impulse method is proposed in [7]. There, the term is replaced by 17 ° (.4(2 )), where A x) represents... 

The derivation of the mollified impulse method in [7] suggests that the same integrator be used for the auxiliary problem as that used for integrating the reduced primary problem M d fdt )X = F X) between impulses. Of eourse, Ax(x) is also needed. For the partitionings + j/aiow typically used in MD, this would lead unfortunately to a matrix Ax(x) with a great many nonzeros. However, it is probably important to take into account only the fastest components of [7]. Hence, it would seem sufficient to use only the fastest forces jjj averaging calculation. 

Fig. 5. Total pseudoenergy (in kcal/mol) vs. simulation time (in fs) for time averaging, Equilibrium, and impulse methods. At for all methods equals 5 fs.)...

A different long-time-step method was previously proposed by Garci a-Archilla, Sanz-Serna, and Skeel [8]. Their mollified impulse method, which is based on the concept of operator splitting and also reduces to the Verlet scheme for A = 0 and admits second-order error estimates independently of the frequencies of A, reads as follows when applied to (1) ... 

Implementation Issues A critical factor in the successful application of any model-based technique is the availability of a suitaole dynamic model. In typical MPC applications, an empirical model is identified from data acquired during extensive plant tests. The experiments generally consist of a series of bump tests in the manipulated variables. Typically, the manipulated variables are adjusted one at a time and the plant tests require a period of one to three weeks. The step or impulse response coefficients are then calculated using linear-regression techniques such as least-sqiiares methods. However, details concerning the procedures utihzed in the plant tests and subsequent model identification are considered to be proprietary information. The scaling and conditioning of plant data for use in model identification and control calculations can be key factors in the success of the apphcation. 

Installations that are electrically exposed to lightning are assigned the impulse voltages as in lists II or III of Table 13.2 or list II of Table 13.3, depending upon the extent of their exposure to lightning and the method of their neutral grounding. 

---