Interfacial electron-transfer

Hwang K C and Mauzerall D C 1992 Vectorial electron transfer from an interfacial photoexcited porphyrin to ground-state Cgg and C g and from ascorbate to triplet Cgg and C g in a lipid bilayer J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 9705-6... 

The size-exclusion and ion-exchange properties of zeoHtes have been exploited to cause electroactive species to align at a zeoHte—water interface (233—235). The zeoHte thus acts as a template for the self-organization of electron transfer (ET) chains that may find function as biomimetic photosynthetic systems, current rectifiers, and photodiodes. An example is the three subunit ET chain comprising Fe(CN)g anion (which is charge-excluded from the anionic zeoHte pore stmcture), Os(bipyridine)3 (which is an interfacial cation due to size exclusion of the bipyridine ligand), and an intrazeoHte cation (trimethylamino)methylferrocene (F J ). A cationic polymer bound to the (CN) anion holds the self-assembled stmcture at an... 

Rapid e / h recombination, the reverse of equation 3, necessitates that D andM be pre-adsorbed prior to light excitation of the Ti02 photocatalyst. In the case of a hydrated and hydroxylated Ti02 anatase surface, hole trapping by interfacial electron transfer occurs via equation 6 to give surface-bound OH radicals (43,44). The necessity for pre-adsorbed D andM for efficient charge carrier trapping calls attention to the importance of adsorption—desorption equihbria in... 

This review article attempts to summarize and discuss recent developments in the studies of photoinduced electron transfer in functionalized polyelectrolyte systems. The rates of photoinduced forward and thermal back electron transfers are dramatically changed when photoactive chromophores are incorporated into polyelectrolytes by covalent bonding. The origins of such changes are discussed in terms of the interfacial electrostatic potential on the molecular surface of the polyelectrolyte as well as the microphase structure formed by amphiphilic polyelectrolytes. The promise of tailored amphiphilic polyelectrolytes for designing efficient photoinduced charge separation systems is afso discussed. 

Interfacial electron transfer in colloidal metal and semiconductor dispersions and photodecomposition of water. K. Kalyanasundaram, M. Gratzel and E. Pelizzelti. Coord. Chem. Rev., 1986, 69, 57 (338). 

Since under normal depletion conditions, conductivity changes are dominated by majority carriers, and interfacial electron transfer can be neglected in the dark, the carrier profile can be found by solving Poisson s equation ... 

Interfacial electron transfer, Marcus model inapplicability, 513 Interfacial parameter... 

Mandelbrot, on fractal surfaces, 52 Mao and Pickup, their work on the oxidation of polypyrrole, 587 Marcus model, inapplicability for interfacial electron transfer, 513 Mechanical breakdown model for passivity, 236... 

Samec Z, Weber J (1973) The influence of chemisorbed sulfur on the kinetic parameters of the reduction of Fe " ions on a platinum electrode on the basis of the Marcus theory of electron transfer. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 44 229-238... 

Duonghung D, Ramsden J, Gratzel M (1982) Dynamics of interfacial electron-transfer processes in colloidal semiconductor systems. J Am Chem Soc 104 2977-2985... 

Photocyanations rely on photoinduced electron transfer [29]. This was demonstrated by monitoring cyanation yields as a function of the droplet size for oil-in-water emulsions. Hence increase in interfacial area is one driver for micro-channel processing. Typically, fluid systems with large specific interfacial areas tend to be difficult to separate and solutions for more facile separation are desired. 

Electron transfer processes leading to a product adsorbed in the interfacial region o are of practical interest. These processes include the deposition of a metal such as Cu or Pd at ITIES, the preparation of colloidal metal particles with catalytic properties for homogeneous organic reactions, or electropolymerization. 

Fig. 23. Effect of pH on the yield of MV after completion of interfacial electron transfer. Colloidal TiOj (500 mg/L) [MV - ] = 10 M...

Fig. 24. Plot of the specific rate of interfacial electron transfer k vs. the pH of the solution. Experiments were conducted with colloidal solutions of TiOj (R = 10 nm) in the presence of 10" M...

Schmickler W. 1996. Interfacial Electrochemistry. New York Oxford University Press. Schmickler W, Koper MTM. 1999. Adiabahc electrochemical electron-transfer reactions involving frequency changes of iimer-sphete modes. Electrochem Comm 1 402-405. Schmickler W, Mohr J. 2002. The rate of electrochemical electron-transfer reachons. J Chem Phys 117 2867-2872. 

Leger C, Jones AK, Albracht SPJ, Armstrong FAA. 2002. Effect of a dispersion of interfacial electron transfer rates on steady state catalytic electron transport in [NiFe]-hydrogenase and other enzymes. J Phys Chem B 106 13058-13063. 

This series covers recent advances in electrocatalysis and electrochemistry and depicts prospects for their contribution into the present and future of the industrial world. It illustrates the transition of electrochemical sciences from a solid chapter of physical electrochemistry (covering mainly electron transfer reactions, concepts of electrode potentials and stmcture of the electrical double layer) to the field in which electrochemical reactivity is shown as a unique chapter of heterogeneous catalysis, is supported by high-level theory, connects to other areas of science, and includes focus on electrode surface structure, reaction environment, and interfacial spectroscopy. 

The interpretation of phenomenological electron-transfer kinetics in terms of fundamental models based on transition state theory [1,3-6,10] has been hindered by our primitive understanding of the interfacial structure and potential distribution across ITIES. The structure of ITIES was initially studied by electrochemical and thermodynamic analyses, and more recently by computer simulations and interfacial spectroscopy. Classical electrochemical analysis based on differential capacitance and surface tension measurements has been extensively discussed in the literature [11-18]. The picture that emerged from... 

Although the correlation between ket and the driving force determined by Eq. (14) has been confirmed by various experimental approaches, the effect of the Galvani potential difference remains to be fully understood. The elegant theoretical description by Schmickler seems to be in conflict with a great deal of experimental results. Even clearer evidence of the k t dependence on A 0 has been presented by Fermin et al. for photo-induced electron-transfer processes involving water-soluble porphyrins [50,83]. As discussed in the next section, the rationalization of the potential dependence of ket iti these systems is complicated by perturbations of the interfacial potential associated with the specific adsorption of the ionic dye. 

Between 0.20 and 0.30 V, a decay of the initial photocurrent and a negative overshoot after interrupting the illumination are developed. This behavior resembles the responses observed at semiconductor-electrolyte interfaces in the presence of surface recombination of photoinduced charges [133-135] but at a longer time scale. These features are in fact related to the back-electron-transfer processes within the interfacial ion pair schematically depicted in Fig. 11. 

---