Inflammability risk

Flashpoints (the reason for the plurality is explained in paragraph 1.3) have the advantage of being linked to the boiling point, the pressure and the lower explosive limit. This is the reason why flashpoints are such important parameters in the evaluation of the inflammability risk of a liquid or a solid. The measurement of flashpoints implies the existence of an ignition flame for the gaseous mixture. Nevertheless, contact of a suitable substance-air mixture with a hot surface can be sufficient to start the combustion of the mixture. The autoignition temperature is the parameter that determines the possibility that an inflammable material will combust in contact with a hot substance without the presence of a flame. 

The vapour pressure of a liquid provides an essential safety parameter and it is mandatory that safety sheets contain these values (when they are known). This parameter is taken into account in some classification methods of inflammability risk. It enables one to determine the equilibrium vapour concentration of a liquid in air. This concentration can then be used to ascertain whether a working environment presents an inflammability risk (by reference to the inflammability limits) or a toxicity hazard (by comparison with the exposure values). 

The prevention plan, and in particular symbols and warnings on labels and packaging of a substance, will depend on this risk level. In order to make sense, the risk classification has to take into account the inflammability level of a substance, to be on a coherent risk scale and not the mere result of more or less unpredictable fluctuations, particularly those due to the choice of apparatus or working method. The aim of estimation is to be able to identify substances on a scale where their position directly indicates their level of inflammability risk. 

It now has to be ascertained whether, despite the numerous causes mentioned previously, AIT remains a sufficiently discriminating parameter to render it suitable as an analysis criterion of the level of inflammability risk of a substance. 

The choice of a solvent is of course determined primarily by its suitability for the actual recrystallisation of the given crude product. If two or more solvents appear to be almost equally suitable for the recrystallisation, the final choice should depend on the inflammability (and therefore risk in use) of the solvent, and also on its cost. It is assumed that a solvent which might have any chemical action on the compound has already been debarred. The chief solvents normally available are ... 

For temperatures up to 100°, a water bath or steam bath is generally employed. The simplest form is a beaker or an enamelled iron vessel mounted on a suitable stand water is placed in the vessel, which is heated by means of a flame. This arrangement may be used for non-inflammable liquids or for refluxing liquids of low boiling point. Since numerous liquids of low boiling point are highly inflammable, the presence of a naked flame will introduce considerable risk of fire. For such liquids a steam bath or an electrically-heated water bath, provided with a constant-level device, must be used. If the laboratory is equipped with a... 

Despite the universal use of sutures for wound closure, there is a need to utilize adhesives instead, because of their ease of use and the reduced risk of infection. Alkyl cyanoacrylate adhesives have been studied extensively for this use, and a significant amount of research has been performed to evaluate their interaction with living tissue [40,41 J. They have been approved for external use only, because of concerns with the fact that the polymers do not readily biodegrade and can cause inflammation around the area to which it was applied. However, these concerns are reduced for -butyl cyanoacrylate, as compared to the ethyl cyanoacrylate. There is even some evidence that their use as liquid sutures actually reduces the rate of infection around the healing wound or surgical incision [42J. 

Our new appreciation of the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis shows the way for translation of these novel biological insights to clinical practice, for example by aiding the identification of individuals at risk of adverse cardiovascular events [5]. In this context, inflammatory biomarkers such as CRP merit rigorous consideration for inclusion in risk assessment strategies. In addition, these scientific advances provide a framework... 

Insulin resistance occurs when the normal response to a given amount of insulin is reduced. Resistance of liver to the effects of insulin results in inadequate suppression of hepatic glucose production insulin resistance of skeletal muscle reduces the amount of glucose taken out of the circulation into skeletal muscle for storage and insulin resistance of adipose tissue results in impaired suppression of lipolysis and increased levels of free fatty acids. Therefore, insulin resistance is associated with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities including elevated blood glucose levels, abnormal blood lipid profile (dyslipidemia), hypertension, and increased expression of inflammatory markers (inflammation). Insulin resistance and this cluster of metabolic abnormalities is strongly associated with obesity, predominantly abdominal (visceral) obesity, and physical inactivity and increased risk for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular and renal disease, as well as some forms of cancer. In addition to obesity, other situations in which insulin resistance occurs includes... 

Niacin is used as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of very high serum triglyceride levels in patients who present a risk of pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas) and who do not experience an adequate response to dietary control. 

Confronted with a chemical substance or group of compounds the reader has to consider the four potential categories of risk - inflammability, instability, toxicity and dangerous reactions resulting from contact with other substances and materiais. But procedure does not only relate to chemical substances. It concerns other materials (eg asbestos), and modes of operation and introduces most often a manipuiator . These processes occur in an environment which also can have significant role. 

In order to identify and then establish the risk level of a chemical, one uses a certain number of risk parameters. The purpose of this chapter is to consider these parameters in detail. It is also to enable the reader to submit these parameters to critical analysis if values are available, or to estimate them if they are unknown. The user of this book should then be able to offer an evaluation of the risk level of inflammability of a particular chemical. This is necessary even if the chemical is not in the tables included later in this book. 

The value obtained will allow direct comparison with the limits of inflammability that are always given in percentage form and enable us to deduce whether the substance presents the risk of building an explosive mixture with air. Note that if the chosen unit is the millibar, the value P ap is to be divided by ten in order to obtain the concentration. This expression will be used in the determination of II code (infammability index (see para 1.5.5). 

LEL is the most important of the two limits. It is mostly useful when inflammable substances are handled in confined spaces (reservoirs, painting cabins, ovens etc). Detaiis of limits of inflammability are kept by chemical substance manufacturers who are required to mention them on safety sheets that have to be put at clients disposal. When compared with the equilibrium concentration determined as indicated before, LEL aiiows determination of whether a working environment presents a risk of explosion in the presence of a source of ignition. 

Flashpoint is the temperature at which an inflammable liquid builds enough vapour so that this, together with air, forms an inflammable mixture in the presence of an igniting flame.The inflammation has to be very brief when this parameter is measured. If the combustion lasts for longer than five seconds, this temperature is defined as fire point. Fire point is never used because it is really difficult to obtain an accurate value. Flashpoint is the most important parameter in fire hazard. It plays an essential role in the determination of risk criteria related to the inflammability of a substance. 

The flashpoint experimental data overlap each other. Notice in anticipation that there is a limit of 93°C, which leads to a change in the NFPA classification code (inflammability from 1 to 2) showing how sometimes the level of error can have important consequences on risk evaluation. This example shows up another concern, which is in considering a comparison of the approach by Hilado with the author s variant, since there is a conflict between the methods on the calculation of stoichiometric concentration. 

The NFPA code is represented in a diamond containing 4 sectors, respectively toxicity, inflammability, reactivity and special risks . A coloured code that will appear on glass labels, at the back of transport vehicles, room doors etc enables the danger to be better noted. It is used by American companies although some French companies have also adopted it and it appears to be an efficient device. 

So far as risk 10 is concerned, fire regulations indicate that compounds that have the above mentioned inflammable properties could be classified as not inflammable if they could not in any way encourage combustion... . 

II code (or II,) gives the vapour equilibrium concentration as a percent of LEL It has a clear physical meaning and its value can be directly linked to the risk. We know that above 100% the equilibrium concentration enters the inflammability zone. 

This code is of limited usefulness (see para 1.5.3) (it is supposed to contain in one figure only the level of the three factors inflammability, toxicity and stability). So far as toxicity risk is concerned, the definition of the three degrees is clear and makes it easy to choose between the different risk levels, it is defined by LD50 values (given in mg/kg) and LC50 (given in ppm). 

In France these correspond to what is decided by the European UnionT The codes used for inflammable, unstable substances and for some risks linked to reactivity have already been described. There are numerous codes for toxicity and comosive-ness and these have the skull as a symbol for toxic substances, an X for harmful substances pabout risk and some cautionary advice that bear numbers preceded with the letter R, and sentences about risk and S for cautionary advice. Everything has to appear on the container labels. Cautionary advice has never seemed coherent or sufficiently exhaustive and only risk codes are mentioned in Part Three. Notes on risk appear in the following tabie. 

These codes can be combined when a substance has multiple risks. Codes are then separated by a siash (for different means of penetration) or a dash (for risks of different nature). Thus 20/21/22 means that a substance is harmful by inhalation, skin contact and ingestion, if the substance is inflammable as well, it is 10-20/21/22. A compound can have different acute and chronic toxicity levels. For example, for phenylamine 20/21/22-40-48/23/24/25, ie harmful by inhalation, skin contact, ingestion possibility of irreversibie effects risk of toxic effects by inhalation, skin contact and prolonged ingestion. 

Physical factors favouring inflammability were analysed in paragraph 1.5.4, and the physical factors that apply to unstable compounds were also mentioned. Also underlined was that this classification method was aimed at carrying out quantitative risk analyses. It is precisely for the analysis of dangerous reactions that this method was suggested. It works as follows ... 

Mercury forms amalgams with numerous metals. Usually, this conversion is very exothermic, therefore it can present risks the reaction can become violent if a metai is added too quickly into mercury. Accidents have been described with caicium (at 390°C), aluminium, alkali metals (lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium) and cerium. Some of these alloys are very inflammable, in particular the Hg-Zn amalgam. 

The Code du travail and NFPA hazard codes are explained in Part I in the references that are concerned with each risk. For inorganic products the inflammability, reactivity and toxicity codes are mentioned. For organic products the toxicity code is the only one that is given. Indeed, the inflammability code can be found easily (see para 1.5.1) and the reactivity code is included in chapter 6 under dangerous reactions of inorganic products. 

The risk of developing colonic cancer is raised in UC, particularly in those with long-standing extensive disease (Lennard-Jones et al., 1990). The mechanism of this increased susceptibility is unknown, although it is tempting to speculate that it is related to inflammation and resulting oxidative damage to DNA. As yet there is little evidence to support this contention. Markowitz et al. (1988) have reported a decrease in constituent and oxidant-induced adenosine diphosphate ribosyl... 

---