Separation hydrocarbon class

Natural gas and crude oils are the main sources for hydrocarbon intermediates or secondary raw materials for the production of petrochemicals. From natural gas, ethane and LPG are recovered for use as intermediates in the production of olefins and diolefms. Important chemicals such as methanol and ammonia are also based on methane via synthesis gas. On the other hand, refinery gases from different crude oil processing schemes are important sources for olefins and LPG. Crude oil distillates and residues are precursors for olefins and aromatics via cracking and reforming processes. This chapter reviews the properties of the different hydrocarbon intermediates—paraffins, olefins, diolefms, and aromatics. Petroleum fractions and residues as mixtures of different hydrocarbon classes and hydrocarbon derivatives are discussed separately at the end of the chapter. 

Hydrocarbon Class Analysis. The hydrocarbon class or type separation of the pentane-soluble fraction was performed on a silica gel-alumina column according... 

Table V. Hydrocarbon Type Class Separation of the Pentane-Soluble Fraction...

The effect of temperature on the formation of hydrocarbons, as revealed by class separation of the pentane-soluble fraction, is shown in Figure 5. 

Chemical fractionation of whole products and by-products from synthetic fuel production affords a logical first step in the evaluation of these materials for biological activity and the subsequent prediction of health hazards. Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, along with smaller amounts of heteroatomic species, constitute the bulk of all crude product materials and define a primary class separation need. Subfractionation of these fractions can lead to identification of bioactive components, Aliphatics are separated from the entire sample by a simple liquid chromatographic elution scheme. Aromatic compounds can be isolated by a cyclo-hexane-dimethylsulfoxide solvent partitioning scheme, A Sephadex LH-20 gel separation scheme appears feasible for the fractionation of crude liquids into aliphatic-aromatic, lipophilic-hydrophilic, polymeric, and hydrogen bonding classes of compounds. 

Fractionation into Hydrocarbon Classes. All extracts were chromatographed on Davison grade 923 silica gel, as reported earlier (6,7). Two fractions, containing saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, respectively, were collected in separate 25-mL Kontes concentrator tubes. These fractions were concentrated to 1 mL on a modified Kontes tube heater. After adding 2 mL of hexane, the extract was reconcentrated to 1 mL and transferred to GC sample vials. After adding 4 fig of hexa-methylbenzene (GC internal standard) in hexane, the vials were sealed for GC analysis. 

Other separating techniques may be used to separate total hydrocarbons into different classes. Thus, the normal paraffins are selectively removed by 5 A molecular sieve (Mortimer and Luke, 1967) or by urea adduction, although it is less specific than the former method. Unsaturated hydrocarbons are separated from the saturated fraction by thin layer or column chromatography on silicic acid/AgNOj. 

Figure 5 Colour plot of the GCxGC high-resolution separation of a diesel [32]. Because of the clustering, all the hydrocarbon classes can be identified, from n-C7 through n-Cjg and the branched alkanes in between, up to toluene through C2o-monoaromatics. From naphthalenes (second-dimension retention times 10 s) through the triaromatics in the top of the plot. The insert depicts one single second-dimension chromatogram, showing that in a single one-dimensional peak at least thirty compounds may co-elute.

FIGURE 32.8 Chemical class separation scheme for synthetic fuel products. HCs, hydrocarbons PACs, polycychc aromatic compounds N-PACs, nitrogen polycychc aromatic compounds 2 -PANHs, secondary nitrogen polycyclic aromatic heterocycles APAHs, amino polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 3 -PANHs, tertiary nitrogen polycyclic aromatic heterocycles. 

The proportions of individual wax classes separated by TLC from surface lipid extracts from healthy and infected leaves of the different wheat cultivars (Table 2) showed no clear correlations with their susceptibility to powdery mildew and uninfected plants of each cultivar appeared to differ in their profile of surface lipids. Hydrocarbons formed the largest component of the surface wax from leaves of the disease resistant varieties Apollo and Beaver as well as of the susceptible cultivars Sebo and Sham-1, whereas the moderately resistant Ycora Rojo and the susceptable Probred and Westbred produced lower proportions of hydrocarbons with higher proportions of primary alcohols. No consistent differences in wax composition following infection seemed to occur, although some changes in individual components were noted, these varied with the cultivars. 

Another important class of materials which can be successfiilly described by mesoscopic and contimiiim models are amphiphilic systems. Amphiphilic molecules consist of two distinct entities that like different enviromnents. Lipid molecules, for instance, comprise a polar head that likes an aqueous enviromnent and one or two hydrocarbon tails that are strongly hydrophobic. Since the two entities are chemically joined together they cannot separate into macroscopically large phases. If these amphiphiles are added to a binary mixture (say, water and oil) they greatly promote the dispersion of one component into the other. At low amphiphile... 

Picrates, Many aromatic hydrocarbons (and other classes of organic compounds) form molecular compounds with picric acid, for example, naphthalene picrate CioHg.CgH2(N02)30H. Some picrates, e.g., anthracene picrate, are so unstable as to be decomposed by many, particularly hydroxylic, solvents they therefore cannot be easily recrystaUised. Their preparation may be accomplished in such non-hydroxylic solvents as chloroform, benzene or ether. The picrates of hydrocarbons can be readily separated into their constituents by warming with dilute ammonia solution and filtering (if the hydrocarbon is a solid) through a moist filter paper. The filtrate contains the picric acid as the ammonium salt, and the hydrocarbon is left on the filter paper. 

Separations based upon differences in the chemical properties of the components. Thus a mixture of toluene and anihne may be separated by extraction with dilute hydrochloric acid the aniline passes into the aqueous layer in the form of the salt, anihne hydrochloride, and may be recovered by neutralisation. Similarly, a mixture of phenol and toluene may be separated by treatment with dilute sodium hydroxide. The above examples are, of comse, simple apphcations of the fact that the various components fah into different solubihty groups (compare Section XI,5). Another example is the separation of a mixture of di-n-butyl ether and chlorobenzene concentrated sulphuric acid dissolves only the w-butyl other and it may be recovered from solution by dilution with water. With some classes of compounds, e.g., unsaturated compounds, concentrated sulphuric acid leads to polymerisation, sulphona-tion, etc., so that the original component cannot be recovered unchanged this solvent, therefore, possesses hmited apphcation. Phenols may be separated from acids (for example, o-cresol from benzoic acid) by a dilute solution of sodium bicarbonate the weakly acidic phenols (and also enols) are not converted into salts by this reagent and may be removed by ether extraction or by other means the acids pass into solution as the sodium salts and may be recovered after acidification. Aldehydes, e.g., benzaldehyde, may be separated from liquid hydrocarbons and other neutral, water-insoluble hquid compounds by shaking with a solution of sodium bisulphite the aldehyde forms a sohd bisulphite compound, which may be filtered off and decomposed with dilute acid or with sodium bicarbonate solution in order to recover the aldehyde. 

Historically, measurements have classified ambient hydrocarbons in two classes methane (CH4) and all other nonmethane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs). Analyzing hydrocarbons in the atmosphere involves a three-step process collection, separation, and quantification. Collection involves obtaining an aliquot of air, e.g., with an evacuated canister. The principal separation process is gas chromatography (GC), and the principal quantification technique is wdth a calibrated flame ionization detector (FID). Mass spectroscopy (MS) is used along with GC to identify individual hydrocarbon compounds. 

All refining operations may be classed as either conversion processes or separation processes. In the former, the feed undergoes a chemical reaction such as cracking, polymerization, or desulfurization. Separation processes take advantage of differences in physical properties to split the feed into two or more different products. Distillation, the most common of all refinery separation processes, uses differences in boiling points to separate hydrocarbon mixtures. 

The complexity of oil fractions is not so much the number of different classes of compounds, but the total number of components that can be present. Even more challenging is the fact that, unlike the situation with other complex samples, in which only a few specific compounds have to be separated from the matrix, in oil fractions the components of the matrix itself are the analytes. Figure 14.1 presents an estimation (by extrapolation) of the total number of possible hydrocarbon isomers with up to twenty carbon atoms present in oil fractions. Although probably not all of these isomers are always present, these numbers are nevertheless somewhat overwhelming. This makes a complete compositional analysis using a single column separation of unsaturated fractions with boiling points above 100 °C utterly impossible. 

FIGURE 12.4 (A) Diagrammatic representation of the separation of major simple lipid classes on silica gel TLC — solvent system hexane diethylether formic acid (80 20 2) (CE = cholesteryl esters, WE = wax esters, HC = hydrocarbon, EEA = free fatty acids, TG = triacylglycerol, CHO = cholesterol, DG = diacylglycerol, PL = phospholipids and other complex lipids). (B) Diagrammatic representation of the separation of major phospholipids on silica gel TLC — solvent sytem chloroform methanol water (70 30 3) (PA = phosphatidic acid, PE = phosphatidylethanolamine, PS = phosphatidylserine, PC = phosphatidylcholine, SPM = sphingomyelin, LPC = Lysophosphatidylcholine). 

---