Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Human toxicity potential analysis

EXAMPLE CHLOR-ALKALI PRODUCTION WITH HUMAN TOXICITY POTENTIAL ANALYSIS... [Pg.73]

Effect analysis. The CalTOX scheme can calculate cancer and non-cancer human toxicity potential (HTP) values for air and surface water emissions of 330 compounds. However, more information concerning the HTP and toxicity of a compound are available in the next chapter. [Pg.61]

O Brien PJ (2014) High-content analysis in toxicology screening substances for human toxicity potential, elucidating subcellular mechanisms and in vivo use as translational safety biomarkers. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 115, 4-17. [Pg.126]

An analysis was accompHshed using toxicity characterization factors for human toxicity potential by ingestion, from the WAR algorithm [49] as shown in... [Pg.78]

Another model, used in the USA, is the OASYS Pollution Prevention Optional Analysis System, developed by the Toxic Use Reduction Institute. Technologies are assessed on a variety of hazard criteria, including acute and chronic human toxicity, physical properties, aquatic impacts, persistence/bioaccumulation, atmospheric releases, disposal, chemical properties, energy/resource use, product hazard and exposure potential. Alternatives are rated to... [Pg.8]

O Brien, P.J. (2008) Chapter 13 High content analysis of sublethal cytotoxicity in human HepG2 hepatocytes for assessing potential and mechanism for chemical and drug-induced human toxicity, in High Content Screening Science, Techniques and Applications (ed. S.A. Haney), John Wiley Sons, Hoboken, NJ,... [Pg.343]

The general equation for risk assessment is the product of exposure and toxic potential. The above discussion, focused on human health exposure assessment, is clearly applicable to the analysis of uncertainty in the determinants and predictions of toxic effect per unit exposure. Indeed the complete assessment of risk and its uncertainty comes from the integrated evaluation of uncertainty associated with both toxicity and exposure. It is simply an extension of the technique demonstrated above with the addition of algorithms for toxic effect yielding a forecasted distribution of predicted risk. [Pg.1739]

A congener-specific analysis of a commercial PCB preparation and the PCB composition of a human milk sample were reported originally by Safe et al. (1985b). Recent studies have demonstrated the analysis of non-ortho coplanar and mono-ortho coplanar PCBs in breast milk (Dewailly et al. 1991) and coplanar PCBs in serum and adipose tissue (Patterson et al. 1994). Determination of these congeners (PCBs 77, 126, 169) is useful in assessing the toxic potential of breast milk for infants. [Pg.673]

Life-cycle assessment when carried ont according to the ISO rules has shown its ability to deliver data for certain more global environmental compartments like the impact potential on saving of resonrces, global warming potential, acidification, ozone depletion, and the like. It nsnally does not cover local effects such as noise or smell and hazardons snbstances. Here risk assessment or other methodologies are needed. The evalnation of effects regarding human toxicity is hampered by a lack of sufficient data and by a still undecided question of data evaluation. Thns, life-cycle analysis is a nseful tool but not the only answer to all enviromnental aspects. [Pg.552]

The annex V of Directive 67/548/EEC, in the EU document, OECD guidelines for testing method for chemicals, addressing three areas of concern (i) determination of physical-chemical properties (ii) methods for determining effects on human health and (iii) methods for environmental effects. Annex lA of Directive 93/67/EEC is involved with the risk assessment of potential toxic effects concerning human health. The technical guidance document on risk assessment published by the European Commission [4], is involved with human health assessment. Analysis of hazard identification and dose-response assessment is based on the following key points ... [Pg.433]

Manufacturing processes for sustainability can be optimized in the context of life cycle analysis (Shoimard and Hiew 2000). It involves definition of the process boundaries and quantifiable sustainability impacts in the form of established metrics, incorporated into process design and optimization. It has been applied to determining waste treatment options, abatement of pollution, and designing the optimal recipe of solvents. Impact indices, such as ozone depletion potential to human toxicity and eco-toxicity, developed by the EPA, can be used. This method has been applied in a methyl ethyl ketone production plant to determine the effect of recycling on the enviromnent (Shonnard and Hiew 2000). [Pg.292]

The Chemical Process Industry (CPI) uses various quantitative and qualitative techniques to assess the reliability and risk of process equipment, process systems, and chemical manufacturing operations. These techniques identify the interactions of equipment, systems, and persons that have potentially undesirable consequences. In the case of reliability analyses, the undesirable consequences (e.g., plant shutdown, excessive downtime, or production of off-specification product) are those incidents which reduce system profitability through loss of production and increased maintenance costs. In the case of risk analyses, the primary concerns are human injuries, environmental impacts, and system damage caused by occurrence of fires, explosions, toxic material releases, and related hazards. Quantification of risk in terms of the severity of the consequences and the likelihood of occurrence provides the manager of the system with an important decisionmaking tool. By using the results of a quantitative risk analysis, we are better able to answer such questions as, Which of several candidate systems poses the least risk Are risk reduction modifications necessary and What modifications would be most effective in reducing risk ... [Pg.1]

Most human or environmental healtli hazards can be evaluated by dissecting tlie analysis into four parts liazard identification, dose-response assessment or hazard assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. For some perceived healtli liazards, tlie risk assessment might stop with tlie first step, liazard identification, if no adverse effect is identified or if an agency elects to take regulatory action witliout furtlier analysis. Regarding liazard identification, a hazard is defined as a toxic agent or a set of conditions that luis the potential to cause adverse effects to hmnan health or tlie environment. Healtli hazard identification involves an evaluation of various forms of information in order to identify the different liaz.ards. Dose-response or toxicity assessment is required in an overall assessment responses/cffects can vary widely since all chemicals and contaminants vary in their capacity to cause adverse effects. This step frequently requires that assumptions be made to relate... [Pg.285]

Molecular structural analysis is a developing method. The objective of a molecuhu structural analysis is to demonstrate a physical, structural, or chemical similarity between tlie chemical in question and a known toxic chemical tliat produces toxic and healtli effects in experimental animals and/or humans. Unfortunately, scientists do not fully understand tlie effects of slight changes in tlie chemical structure and tlieir biological effect on humans. As a result, tills type of analysis is useful in preliminary studies to identify potential health hazards for further e. amination with more established metliods in short-tenii tests or tests in experimental animals, hi its present stage of development, molecular structural analysis caiuiot be used to make absolute decisions about tlie appropriate levels of exposure of humans to chemicals... [Pg.302]

Residue chemists will need to continue to improve the speed of analysis. In situ measuring methods that can be applied in the field or processing plant or retail outlet would be particularly useful, so that decisions can be made rapidly which might avert toxicity to humans or wildlife, potential residue problems or unnecessary economic loss. [Pg.9]


See other pages where Human toxicity potential analysis is mentioned: [Pg.327]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.2305]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.412]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.75 , Pg.81 ]




SEARCH



Human analysis

Human toxicity

Human toxicity potential

Potentiation toxicity

Toxic analysis

Toxic potential

Toxicity potential

Toxicity potentiators

© 2024 chempedia.info