Fixed performance standard

In terms of ensuring that performance standards are met, it is preferable for the laboratory to participate in proficiency tests - both declared and undeclared. There are a number of these commercially available, or they may be prepared in-house, although this latter approach is always open to accusations of results fixing and bias. While many analysts are understandably nervous about such tests, when properly handled they can be used to improve the performance of the laboratory. 

One problem faced by the innovator in the marketplace is the time needed for a return on investment for developing a new product compared with the time the construction industry takes to accept a product. A ten year time scale from prototype to acceptance is too long for mo.st investors. However, that is typically the time that the civil engineering industry takes to accept new technology. Mew performance standards may help the innovator by giving better, fixed goal posts to aim at. However, the industry still has to accept and try new products... 

There are two different ways to perform standard addition calibrations. The first is known as the conventional standard addition calibration (C-SAC) which compares the instrumental responses of several solutions in separate vessels containing the same quantity of sample, but different quantities of calibration standard and a blank, such that the volume in each vessel is fixed. The second is the sequential standard addition calibration (S-SAC) which compares the instrumental response from a quantity of sample in a single vessel to the instrumental response following the addition of portions of calibration solution into this same vessel, such that the volume considered in each measurement is not fixed. Quantification in both cases is performed by extrapolation of the calibration relationship produced to the intercept with the x-axis at zero analyte content. 

A third fundamental type of laboratory distillation, which is the most tedious to perform of the three types of laboratory distillations, is equilibrium-flash distillation (EFV), for which no standard test exists. The sample is heated in such a manner that the total vapor produced remains in contact with the total remaining liquid until the desired temperature is reached at a set pressure. The volume percent vaporized at these conditions is recorded. To determine the complete flash curve, a series of runs at a fixed pressure is conducted over a range of temperature sufficient to cover the range of vaporization from 0 to 100 percent. As seen in Fig. 13-84, the component separation achieved by an EFV distillation is much less than by the ASTM or TBP distillation tests. The initial and final EFN- points are the bubble point and the dew point respectively of the sample. If desired, EFN- curves can be established at a series of pressures. 

Figure 2.2.1 shows the simplified sketch of the reactor used for the microactivity test. As can be seen, a fluid-bed catalyst is tested in a fixed bed reactor in the laboratory to predict its performance in a commercial fluid bed reactor. This can be done only because enormous empirical experience exists that has accumulated throughout several decades in several hundreds of reactors both in production and in laboratories. The standard states ... 

Where an effective informal system exists and is followed, the issue is one of style, not substance. A facility or unit may have a strong safety culture and sound safety practices, but its managers lack the habit of form documentation, or simply don t think it is important. Assuming that safety performance meets applicable standards, you will probably assign cases like these a relatively low priority, compared with other noncompliance situations. Cases like these are also often the easiest to fix since the fundamentals are already in place, what s required is simply to formalize the informal system by preparing and implementing documentation procedures. 

The final step in the process of standardizing our columns was to try and maintain the high quality of columns from batch to batch of gel from the manufacturer. This was done by following the basic procedures outlined earlier for the initial column evaluation with two exceptions. First, we did not continue to use the valley-to-peak ratios or the peak separation parameters. We decided that the D20 values told us enough information. The second modification that we made was to address the issue of discontinuities in the gel pore sizes (18,19). To do this, we selected six different polyethylenes made via five different production processes. These samples are run every time we do an evaluation to look for breaks or discontinuities that might indicate the presence of a gel mismatch. Because the resins were made by several different processes, the presence of a discontinuity in several of these samples would be a strong indication of a problem. Table 21.5 shows the results for several column evaluations that have been performed on different batches of gel over a 10-year period. Table 21.5 shows how the columns made by Polymer Laboratories have improved continuously over this time period. Figure 21.2 shows an example of a discontinuity that was identified in one particular evaluation. These were not accepted and the manufacturer quickly fixed the problem. 

An increase in steam pressure over design will not increase vapor handling capacity for the usual fixed capacity ejector. The increased pressure usually decreases capacity due to the extra steam in the diffuser. The best ejector steam economy is attained when the steam nozzle and diffuser are proportioned for a specified performance [8]. This is the reason it is difficult to keep so-called standard ejectors in stock and expect to have the equivalent of a custom designed unit. The throttling type ejector has a family of performance curves depending upon the motive steam pressure. This type has a lower compression ratio across the ejector than the fixed-type. The fixed-type unit is of the most concern in this presentation. 

Since our backbone 2 aPNA incorporates six Lys residues in its peptide sequence and is cationic at a physiological pH, we were optimistic that this aPNA would be taken up into cells without the need for any external carrier system. To answer the simple question of whether b2 aPNAs are intemahzed, a standard fluorescence microscopy experiment was performed to see if whole cells that were incubated with a fluorescent-labeled aPNA would internahze labeled material [70]. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells in culture were incubated with BODIPY-la-beled TCCCT(b2) at 37 °C for various periods of time. Following incubation, the cells were rinsed in phosphate-buffered sahne (PBS), fixed with 4% formaldehyde at ambient temperature for 20 min, then washed with PBS and stored in a refrigerator until examined by fluorescence microscopy. 

The difference in rates of release of BCNU from wafers produced by the trituration or solution methods is also seen in vivo (11,14), as is shown in Fig. 6. Wafers of PCPP-SA 20 80 were prepared by either the solution or trituration methods, as described above, and were implanted into the brains of rabbits. The animals were sacrificed at various times after implantation and the brains were removed, fixed, and processed for quantitative autoradiography. To quantitate the percentage of the brain exposed to BCNU released from these wafers, the following calculation was performed. The percentage of the brain in which the radioactivity from the tritiated BCNU released from the wafers exceeded the background counts by at least two standard deviation units was plotted as a function of time following implantation in Fig. 6. A control set of rabbits had a solution of BCNU injected directly into the same location in the... 

Hydrolytic Kinetic Resolution (HKR) of epichlorohydrin. The HKR reaction was performed by the standard procedure as reported by us earlier (17, 22). After the completion of the HKR reaction, all of the reaction products were removed by evacuation (epoxide was removed at room temperature ( 300 K) and diol was removed at a temperature of 323-329 K). The recovered catalyst was then recycled up to three times in the HKR reaction. For flow experiments, a mixture of racemic epichlorohydrin (600 mmol), water (0.7 eq., 7.56 ml) and chlorobenzene (7.2 ml) in isopropyl alcohol (600 mmol) as the co-solvent was pumped across a 12 cm long stainless steel fixed bed reactor containing SBA-15 Co-OAc salen catalyst (B) bed ( 297 mg) via syringe pump at a flow rate of 35 p,l/min. Approximately 10 cm of the reactor inlet was filled with glass beads and a 2 pm stainless steel frit was installed at the outlet of the reactor. Reaction products were analyzed by gas chromatography using ChiralDex GTA capillary column and an FID detector. 

---