Facility objectives

Scope defines the System s boundaries and identifies its interfaces with other systems, organizations and facilities. Objectives define the systems purpose and expected results. 

The operations group will develop general operating and maintenance objectives for the facilities which will address product quality, costs, safety and environmental issues. At a more detailed level, the mode of operations and maintenance tor a particular project will be specified in the field development plan. Both specifications will be discussed in this section, which will focus on the input of the production operations and maintenance departments to a field development plan. The management of the field during the producing period is discussed in Section 14.0. 

On Russia territory there are about 100 thousands of dangerous enterprises and objects, comprising about 1500 nuclear facilities and 3000 chemical and biological extremely hazardous objects. The average period of emergency situations is 10 — 15 years for accidents and disasters with the material loss up to 2 billion USDs, and 15 — 45 days, when the material loss is up to 100 million USDs. 

This sample, referred to in Chapter 2, can serve as a guide for planning and conducting assessments of tollers. It may require additions, revisions, or other modifications in order to meet the needs of facility specific assessment objectives, the facility setting, or other special circumstances. This sample includes ... 

Now that it is possible to establish test facilities in a laboratory to simulate the time history of an earthquake seismic tests are conducted by creating the ground movements in the test object. Other methods, such as by analysis or by combined analysis and testing, are also available. Refer to IEEE 344 and lEC 60980 for more details. For this purpose a shake table, able to simulate the required seismic conditions (RRS) is developed on which the test object is mounted and its performance observed under the required shock conditions. Since it is not easy to create such conditions in a laboratory, there are only a few of these facilities available. The better equipped laboratories are in Japan, the USA, the UK, Greece, Germany, India and China. In India the Earthquake Engineering Department (EQD) of the University of Roorkee (UoR) is equipped with these facilities. 

QRA practitioners can use to satisfy some QRA objectives. Also, the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) has sponsored a project to expand and improve the quality of component failure data for chemical industry use. And many process facilities have considerable equipment operating experience in maintenance files, operating logs, and the minds of operators and maintenance personnel. These data can be collected and combined with industrywide data to help achieve reasonable QRA objectives. However, care must be exercised to select data most representative of your specific system from the wide range available from various sources. Even data from your own plant may have to be modified (sometimes by a factor of 10 or more) to reflect your plant s current operating environment and maintenance practices. 

If there is a lack of specific, appropriate data for a process facility, there can be considerable uncertainty in a frequency estimate like the one above. When study objectives require absolute risk estimates, it is customary for engineers to want to express their lack of confidence in an estimate by reporting a range estimate (e.g., 90% confidence limits of 8 X 10 per year to 1 X 10 per year) rather than a single-point estimate (e.g., 2 X 10per year). For this reason alone it may be necessary for you to require that an uncertainty analysis be performed. 

Objectives Maximize economic benefit, operate the plant at its maximum efficiency at all operation points Maximize economic benefit, operate the plant at its maximum efficiency at all operation points Optimize overall facilities design and investment... 

Aim to protect the health and safety of everyone m the workplace and ensure that adequate welfare facilities are provided. Covers e.g. general ventilation, temperature m indoor workplaces, lighting, cleanliness, space requirements, condition of floors and traffic routes, measures against falls/fallmg objects, washing facilities. 

The objectives of the audit are first to develop a baseline of the environmental performance of the facility, and then to assess one or more corrective actions (P2 activities) with attractive economics which improve environmental performance. 

Corrective Action Application At a hazardous waste treatment storage and disposal facility in Washington State, a cyanide-bearing waste required treatment. The influent waste stream contained 15 percent cyanide. Electrolytic oxidation was used to reduce the cyanide concentration to less than 5 percent. Alkaline chlorination was used to further reduce the cyanide concentration to 50 mg/1 (the cleanup objective). The electrolytic process was used as a first stage treatment because the heat of reaction, using alkaline chlorination to treat the concentrated cyanide waste, would be so great that it would melt the reactor tank. 

After the ozone has been generated, it is mixed with the water stream being treated in a device called a contactor. The objective of this operation is to maximize the dissolution of ozone into the water at the lowest power expenditure. There is a variety of ozone contactor designs. Principal ones employed in wastewater treatment facilities include ... 

Because of the toxicity of CE, the aqueous effluent from the ethyl chloride reactor, Ri, causes significant problems for the bio-treatment facility. The objective of this case study is to optimally intercept CE-laden streams so as to reduce the CE content of R] to meet the following regulations ... 

Deactivation and D D actions can range from stabilization of multiple hazards at a single site or facilities containing chemical or radioactive contamination, or both, to routine asbestos and lead abatement in a nonindustrial structure. Strategies include programs that meet compliance objectives, protect workers, and make certain that productivity and cost-effectiveness are maintained. The content and extent of health and safety-related programs should be proportionate to the types and degrees of hazards and risks associated with specific operations. 

In May 1988, a Level-1 PSA was undertaken as part of the general risk assessment at DOE facilities. Revision 0 was completed, and reviewed by BNL, DOE and contractors. The revised report was available July 1990 (Azarm, 1990). The broad objective of the HFBR PRA program is to enhance the safety and operational activities throughout the. remaining lifetime of the reactor... 

A deactivated butane pressurized storage facility with two 750 m and two 1,6(X) m spheres was considered for partial activation of the two smaller spheres. A safety review showed that aspects of the facility did not comfily with with current standards of PETROBRAS regarding layout and separation. A PSA was performed with the following objectives ... 

It should be clear that a complete FMEA approach is not practical for the evaluation of production facility safety systems. This is because (1) the cost of failure is not as great as for nuclear power plants or rockets, for which this technology has proven useful (2) production facility design projects cannot support the engineering cost and lead time associated with such analysis (3) regulatory bodies are not staffed to be able to critically analyze the output of an FMEA for errors in subjective judgment and most importantly, (4) there are similarities to the design of all production facilities that have allowed industry to develop a modified FME.A approach that can satisfy all these objections. 

The facility sets formal PSM goals and objectives and tracks their progress. 

Process improvements. Measure progress against previously identified goals. For example, if completing capital project safety reviews within two weeks of submittal was a facility s objective, is this now being achieved ... 

---