Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Exposure, occupational protection

Medical monitoring and surveillance programs enable occupational health professionals to identify adverse health effects caused by exposure to hazardous substances and conditions and to discuss plans with site workers, industrial hygienists, safety professionals, and line management to prevent exposures and protect workers. These goals can be accomplished through two objectives ... [Pg.83]

Observe normal precautions appropriate to the circumstances and quantity of material handled. No occupational exposure limits have been established. Under conditions of frequent use or heavy exposure, respiratory protection may be required. When heated, lauric acid emits an acrid smoke and irritating fumes therefore, use in a well-ventilated area is recommended. [Pg.407]

Use of Stoddard solvent in dry cleaning may result in the occupational exposure of workers in these establishments, either through inhalation or dermal exposure (Air Force 1989b). The use of Stoddard solvent (mineral spirits) in commercial paints may result in inhalation exposure, particularly if the paint is applied with a sprayer (Fidler et al. 1987), as well as dermal exposures if protective clothing is not worn (Air Force 1989b). [Pg.100]

The use of personal protection equipment (PPE) is not allowed as a permanent measure. It should not be a substitute for necessary technical improvements to reach the state of the art In practice, in most cases it is used as an additional supplementary protection measure to give protection against unexpected or accidental incidents, e. g., a sudden leakage. In the case of exceeding the occupational exposure limit or a risk of dermal exposure, personal protection equipment (PPE) must be used. The duration of this must be restricted to the period of necessity. [Pg.171]

Respiratory The incidence of occupational asthma in aluminium smelters has been falling as a result of control of exposure, respiratory protection, and pre-placement medical assessment [3 ]. The incidence in 1992 in a New Zealand study was 9.46/1000/year in 2006 it was 0.36/1000 ear. [Pg.349]

Tarvainen K, Jolanki R, Forsman-Gronholm L, et al. (1993) Exposure, skin protection and occupational skin disease in the glass-fibre-reinforced plastics industry. Contact Dermatitis 29 119-127... [Pg.134]

Tarvainen K, Jolanki R, Forsman-Gronholm L, Estlander T, Pfaffli P, Juntunen J, Kanerva L (1993b) Exposure, skin protection and occupational skin diseases in the glass-fibre reinforced plastics industry. Contact Dermatitis 29 119-127 Tarvainen K, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1994) Occupational dermatoses caused by man-made mineral fibers. Am J Contact Dermat 5 22-29... [Pg.606]

Although the prevention through design standard applies to occupational hazards and risks, the previously given definitions of acceptable risk and ALARP apply to all hazards-related exposures (fire protection, transportation safety, environmental safety, etc.). [Pg.30]

To reduce exposure to lead-based paint hazards created by renovation activities, the work practices standards in this regulation provide basic requirements for occupant protection, site preparation, and cleanup. [Pg.170]

Prior to the 1990s phenyhnercuric acetate was the primary bactericide and fungicide in latex and waterborne paints. Because of the increasing concerns of mercury toxicity and the potential for high consumer and occupational exposures to mercury when present in paints, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) induced U.S. manufacturers of PMA and other mercury compounds to withdraw their registrations for use of these substances as biocides in paints (see AIercury). Mercury compounds are used only for very limited, specific purposes, such as the use of phenyhnercuric mXx.2LX.e[55-68-5] as a bactericide in cosmetic eye preparations (see Cosmetics). [Pg.114]

It is good practice to keep concentrations of airborne nickel in any chemical form as low as possible and certainly below the relevant standard. Local exhaust ventilation is the preferred method, particularly for powders, but personal respirator protection may be employed where necessary. In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) personal exposure limit (PEL) for all forms of nickel except nickel carbonyl is 1 mg/m. The ACGIH TLVs are respectively 1 mg/m for Ni metal, insoluble compounds, and fume and dust from nickel sulfide roasting, and 0.1 mg/m for soluble nickel compounds. The ACGIH is considering whether to lower the TLVs for all forms of nickel to 0.05 mg/m, based on nonmalignant respiratory effects in experimental animals. [Pg.14]

Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Permissible Concentration of Radionuclides in Air and in Water for Occupational Exposure, ReportNo. NCRP, No. 22, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, Washington, D.C., 1959. [Pg.246]

Occupational Safety and Health. OSHA has set no specific limits for sodium and potassium sibcates (88). A pmdent industrial exposure standard could range from the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for inert or nuisance particulates to the PEL for sodium hydroxide, depending on the rate of dissolution and the concentration of airborne material. Material safety data sheets issued by siUcate producers should be consulted for specific handling precautions, recommended personal protective equipment, and other important safety information. [Pg.11]

When it approved the New Animal Drug AppHcation (NADA) of formalin, FDA ruled that use of formalin for fisheries was safe for humans and the environment. They ruled that effluents from fish treatments at 250 mg/L should be diluted 10 times and from egg treatments 75 times if 1,000 —2,000 mg/L were used (10,11). Before registering the compound, FDA also addressed carcinogenicity by stating it was not concerned about human exposure from either water or fish treated with formalin. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has procedural guidelines that should protect workers from harm fill levels of formalin. Calculations based on treatment levels demonstrated that a fishery worker is exposed to not more than 0.117 mg/L formalin in the air, well below the levels estabUshed by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration to protect workers. [Pg.322]

Does the toller rely upon respiratory protective equipment to maintain employee exposures below applicable occupational exposure limits If so, for what materials Explain. [Pg.170]


See other pages where Exposure, occupational protection is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.1118]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.868]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.496]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.561 , Pg.562 , Pg.563 ]




SEARCH



Occupant protection

Occupational Exposure Personal Protection Standard

Occupational exposure

Occupational protection

© 2024 chempedia.info