Noise exposure

The primary limitation of a HAZOP study is the length of time required to perform it. Because the study is designed to provide a complete analysis, study sessions can be intensive and lii ing. HAZOP studies typically do not look at occupational hazards (e.g., electrical equipment, rotating equipment, hot surfaces) or chronic hazards (e.g., chronic chemical exposure, noise, heat stress). For experience with HAZOP see Swann (1995). 

HAZOP studies typically do not look at occupational hazards (e.g., electrical equipment, rotating equipment, hot surfaces) or chronic hazards (e.g., chronic chemical exposure, noise, heat stress). 

The suggested baseline of noise tolerance, which, if not exceeded, should result in no hearing loss due to noise. A damage risk criteria statement should include a specification of such factors as time of exposure, noise level, frequency, amount of hearing loss considered significant, percentage of the population to be protected, and method of measuring the noise. 

Table 2. Lower and upper action values, and daily exposure noise limits values for workers.

To verify the modelling of the data eolleetion process, calculations of SAT 4, in the entrance window of the XRII was compared to measurements of RNR p oj in stored data as function of tube potential. The images object was a steel cylinder 5-mm) with a glass rod 1-mm) as defect. X-ray spectra were filtered with 0.6-mm copper. Tube current and exposure time were varied so that the signal beside the object. So, was kept constant for all tube potentials. Figure 8 shows measured and simulated SNR oproj, where both point out 100 kV as the tube potential that gives a maximum. Due to overestimation of the noise in calculations the maximum in the simulated values are normalised to the maximum in the measured values. Once the model was verified it was used to calculate optimal choice of filter materials and tube potentials, see figure 9. 

Minimum exposure times must be observed in order to reach the requisite S/N ratio. As per EN 1435 and EN 584-1, for the different ranges of utilization (energy, wall thickness), definite film elasses are prescribed. They are characterized by the minimum gradient-to-noise ratios. Based on this, one can calculate the minimum values for the S/N ratio based on the IP systems. The exposure time and the device parameter sensitivity and dynamics (latitude) must be adjusted accordingly, with an availability of an at least 12 bit system for the digitalization. 

In fig. 2 an ideal profile across a pipe is simulated. The unsharpness of the exposure rounds the edges. To detect these edges normally a differentiation is used. Edges are extrema in the second derivative. But a twofold numerical differentiation reduces the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of experimental data considerably. To avoid this a special filter procedure is used as known from Computerised Tomography (CT) /4/. This filter based on Fast Fourier transforms (1 dimensional FFT s) calculates a function like a second derivative based on the first derivative of the profile P (r) ... 

Fan noise is demanding and receiving much attention because of environmental laws. The basic control document is the federal OSHA limitation of 90 dB(A) at an operator s work place for 8-h exposure. There are other limitations on entire plant noise at the boundary of new plants from local ordinances which are typically more severe than the OSHA limitation. 

Evaluations of occupational exposure to physical agents such as noise, radiation or heat, biological agents, and multiple chemical agents are similar to the process for single chemical substances but have some key differences. 

Noise. Technical differences exist between personal noise dosimeters and high accuracy sound level meters and these may alter the usual preference for personal monitors. But it is exposure to noise rather than general room noise that must be estimated for comparison with noise exposure criteria, the logarithmic expression and alternative means of summation (3 vs 5 db doubling) compHcate statistics. Exposure criteria for both dose and peak exposure must be evaluated, and space and time variabiUty of noise intensity can be immense. 

Toxic hazards may be caused by chemical means, radiation, and noise. Routes of exposure are (1) eye contact, (2) inhalation, (3) ingestion, (4) skin contact, and (5) ears (noise). An Industrial Hygiene Guide (IHG) is based on exposures for an 8-h day, 40-h week, and is not to be used as a guide in the control of health hazards. It is not to be used as a fine hne between safe and dangerous conditions. 

Congress passed the Occupational and Safety Health Act to ensure worker and workplace safety. Their goal was to make sure employers provide their workers a place of employment free from recognized hazards to safety and health, such as exposure to toxic chemicals, excessive noise levels, mechanical dangers, heat or cold stress, or unsanitary conditions. In order to establish standards for workplace health and safety, the Act also created the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) as the research institution for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). OSHA is a division of the U.S. Department of Labor which oversees the administration of the Act and enforces Federal standards in all 50 states. 

Ventilation noise and the annoyance effects which may result have been a recurring question in recent years for researchers, occupational health services, and various aurhorities. In spite of this, there are still major shortcomings in our knowledge about the links between human effects and exposure to ventilation noise. Current regulations and recommendations are thus based on uncertain principles in certain respects. 

The description of the physical characteristics of ventilation noise is based on more reliable knowledge than the description of the human effect. Misconceptions about the levels and frequency characteristics of ventilation noise are still common. This in turn has sometimes led to wrong suggestions about the measures that should be taken in order to eliminate the effects of a ventilation noise exposure. 

The links between levels of exposure and inconvenience caused by ventilation noise are described in an investigation carried out on office workers.- Technical measurements and analyses of the ventilation noise at 155 typical office workplaces were in this study combined with assessments by the office workers of the level of disturbance that they experienced, the effect on working performance, fatigue, stress-related pain, and headaches. The average noise level was about 40 dB(A) at two of the workplaces, while it was about 35 dB(A) at two others. It emerged from rhe narrow-band analyses that the sound pressure levels of rhe infrasound were not in any event of an order that this type of sound frequencies (below 20 Hz) could contribute to any disturbance effects. Any steps taken to counter the sound frequencies of the ventilation noise under 50 Hz, i.e., the point of btersection between the threshold curve of auditory perception and the spectral level distribution curve of... 

The office workers involved in the study mentioned above rated the ventilation noise as somewhat disturbing to quite disturbing at the two workplaces where the level of exposure was about 40 dB(A). At the two workplaces... 

The results clearly indicated that the ventilation noise was perceived as most acceptable when the tone was situated in the low er part of the frequency range. The experience of disturbance and the associated effects occur at exposure levels above the auditory perception threshold. Above this level, the risk of these effects increases as the perceived loudness increases, provided that the other conditions remain constant. Since the loudness can be predicted relatively accurately by means of technical measurements, any differences in the degree of disturbance can also be predicted by reference to these measurements, provided that they are dependent on differences in the loudness. 

Landsrrom, U., Kjellherg, A., and Soderberg, L. (1991). Spectral character, exposure lei fcls and adverse eft ects of ventilation noise in offices. /. Low frequency Noise and Vibration 10(,i i. 

Landstrom, Eh, Holmberg, K., Kjellberg, A.,. Soderberg, L., and Tesarz, M. (1996). Exposure time and irs influence on noise annoyance at work. /. Low Frequency Noise and Vibration 14(41. 

I.andstrdm, L). (1995). Exposure parameters Involved in low frequency noise annoyance. Proceeding .Assessing, ind Controlling Community Noise with I.ow Frequenev Com[ioncms. Copenhagen, December. 

---