Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Evaluative feedback

Is the theme chosen for the exemplar unit appropriate to make this unit a representative example for micro-macro thinking regarding the substantive substrac-ture (evaluative feedback formal visionary curriculum) ... [Pg.51]

Does the unit have a philosophical substracture such that students indeed experience their micro-macro thinking as meaningful (evaluative feedback attained visionary curriculum) ... [Pg.51]

Again, just as was mentioned in 2.5 above, in view of the Modelling emphasis this Evaluation feedback is not directly relevant however, in tenns of feedback to the organisation in a broader sense (see figure 4.3) it will be obvious that both process designers, interface construction engineers, and managers at several levels of the plant, and the company could clearly benefit from the analysis as presented above. [Pg.106]

Adequacy and appropriateness of the quality control and evaluation program to ensure appropriate course evaluation, feedback, updating, and corrective action. [Pg.324]

Sample Transport Transport time, the time elapsed between sample withdrawal from the process and its introduction into the analyzer, shoiild be minimized, particiilarly if the analyzer is an automatic analyzer-controller. Any sample-transport time in the analyzer-controller loop must be treated as equivalent to process dead time in determining conventional feedback controller settings or in evaluating controller performance. Reduction in transport time usually means transporting the sample in the vapor state. [Pg.767]

On-Hne Procedures The growing trend toward automation in industry has resiilted in many studies of rapid procedures for generating size information so that feedback loops can be instituted as an integral part of a process. Many of these techniques are modifications of more traditional methods. The problems associated with on-line methods include allocation and preparation of a representative sample analysis of the sample evaluation of the results. The interface between the measuring apparatus and the process has the potential of high complexity, and consequently, high costs [Leschonsld, Paiticle Cha racterization, 1, 1 (July 1984)]. [Pg.1828]

To find the value of the feedback capacitor, one evaluates the following ... [Pg.212]

User feedback should be obtained periodically, not just at the time of installation. As users gain familiarity with PSM systems, they may identify potential system breakdown points and improvement opportunities. In addition, evaluation of trends in the responses from survey to survey can help to Identify areas needing improvement and measure your success in improving systems. Where user survey responses suggest an improvement opportunity, you should involve those users in defining the opporhmity and in its analysis. The tools of Total Quality Management can be veiy useful in this effort. [Pg.184]

Human Factors Engineering/Ergonomics approach (control of error by design, audit, and feedback of operational experience) Occupational/process safety Manual/control operations Routine operation Task analysis Job design Workplace design Interface design Physical environment evaluation Workload analysis Infrequent... [Pg.44]

Although the issue of PIF interactions has long been recognized by human factors researchers, little has been done to develop practical recommendations. This is partially a result of the large number of possible PIF combinations and the complexity of their interactions. One of the most effective ways of studying this interaction is through an in-company human factors study which will use operational feedback to evaluate the results of design and human factors innovations. [Pg.149]

In addition to these types of evaluations, the incident reporting and near miss systems should be monitored for improvements in performance that can be attributed to the program. On the basis of feedback from these and other sources such as changes in quality levels or efficiency, modifications should be made to the program to enhance and sustain its effectiveness. Concrete evidence regarding the benefits arising from the program should be communicated to those involved. [Pg.364]

There is an important feedback factor which cannot be properly evaluated at this time. It concerns future municipal investment in a specific waste control system. This could result in legislation controlling the input of important potential waste materials to the municipality. For example large capital investment in a heat/energy recovery system based on incineration might induce legislative restrictions on low calorific materials like metals and glass. [Pg.104]

The applicant must submit complete copies of dossier to the EMEA, and directly to each of the rapporteurs. The EMEA are allowed 14 days to validate the application to ensure that it is complete and in accordance with the regulations, after which the rapporteurs can commence the scientific evaluation. The review process involves considerable feedback between the rapporteurs, the CHMP and the applicant, central to which can be achieving agreement on the final text of the SPC, labels and leaflet. The rapporteurs are required to deliver preliminary assessment reports to the CHMP within 80 days of the start of the review process. The applicant is also copied on the report. Over the next 40 days issues raised in... [Pg.119]

Monitoring and measurement - Establish customer complaints/feedback and internal audits processes, evaluate effectiveness of processes, verify product meets acceptance criteria... [Pg.232]

The effects that changes in vegetation have on soil carbon pools and nutrient availability are also difficult to evaluate. However, several models have been successful in predicting vegetation-soil nutrient relationships because they assume that such changes occur as a result of different rates of decomposition and nutrient release from leaf litter of different taxa 50, 60), Such predictions could be tested and the models refined or parameterized for new taxa by measuring soil nutrient availability and respiration in stands of different species on the same soil type. For example, fifty years ago the U.S. Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) established such stands as species trial plots measurements in some indicate large differences in soil nutrient availability (48), Further measurements in these stands would now occur at the same time-scale at which we expect the feedback between species replacement and soil processes to occur. [Pg.406]

Providing feedback, negative as well as positive, is another important technique that a mentor has to master. Feedback is highly important for learning to occur because it helps mentees to evaluate their current levels of performance and to imderstand what needs to be done to shift their performance to a higher level. [Pg.181]

In this exercise it is the role of the speaker to talk to the listener about the subject of his or her choice. Consequently, the listener is tasked with engaging in active listening. The observer s role is simply to evaluate the listener s ability to listen actively. Once the speaker and listener have completed their conversation (after approximately 15 minutes), both the observer and speaker could give the listener feedback. Once this is done, listener, speaker and observer swap roles. [Pg.289]

The batch process control system we ve purchased provides only a starting point for our process research lab we must also identify and test a comprehensive set of controlled devices and real-time process instruments for chemists and engineers to use as building blocks for real feedback control systems. The technologies we are evaluating for characterization of polymer batches at all process stages include ... [Pg.475]

A further insight is that the best workflow depends on a combination of factors that can in many cases be expressed in closed mathematical form, allowing very rapid graphical feedback to users of what then becomes a visualization rather than a stochastic simulation tool. This particular approach is effective for simple binary comparisons of methods (e.g., use of in vitro alone vs. in silico as prefilter to in vitro). It can also be extended to evaluation of conditional sequencing for groups of compounds, using an extension of the sentinel approach [24]. [Pg.268]


See other pages where Evaluative feedback is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.874]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.1044]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.621]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.44 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info