Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equipment acceptance

Maintenance effort High maintenance of equipment acceptable Complexity and cost of maintenance is significant factor... [Pg.21]

Process Hazards Reviews comprise formal committee meetings where hours are spent intensively examining, by one of the methods described later, a chemical reaction or process, with a report, documentation, and follow-up. Pre-Startup Reviews/Process Hazards Audits are no less intensive, but the time spent is less, because the complexity of the process or equipment being examined is less. Reports, documentation, and follow-up are also a part of the Pre-Startup Review/Process Hazards Audit. An equipment acceptance safety inspection would be considered a Process Hazards Audit. [Pg.15]

Based on knowledge of the extraction techniques discussed in this chapter, make a comparison of each technique. As a suggestion, the following headings can be used for comparison purposes brief description of technique sample volume extraction time per sample solvent consumption relative cost of equipment acceptability approval of methods (USEPA). [Pg.163]

Equipment acquisition and deployment Medical device systems and products typically emerge from the strategic technology planning process as required and budgeted needs. The process that follows, which ends with equipment acceptance testing and placement into general use, is known as the equipment acquisition and deployment process. [Pg.788]

Protective laboratory practices and equipment" means those laboratory procedures, practices and equipment accepted by laboratory health and safety experts as effective, or that the employer can show to be effective, in minimizing the potential for employee exposure to hazardous chemicals. [Pg.221]

Also included in Table 3-2 are the acceptance wage function for the most risk-averse (a = 0.98) and the least risk-averse (a = 0.96) workers and the offer wage function for firms with the most productive (p = 1) and least productive (p = 0.1) safety equipment. Acceptance and offer wage functions represent the monetized value of the indifference and isoprofit curves in wage/risk space. We derived asking and offer wages using the level of utility or profit for a completely safe... [Pg.84]

A general checklist as a reference from which a specifically tailored checklist can be developed for use in design reviews, and for equipment acceptance... [Pg.222]

Be a signatory on an Equipment Acceptance-Safety Review Form (Figure 1) prior to newly installed or altered equipment or processes being released to normal production. [Pg.233]

An Equipment Acceptance-Safety Review Form shall be completed, the signatories to which shall be the engineer-in-charge, the department manager or supervisor, and the safety professional... [Pg.236]

The example of an Equipment Acceptance-Safety Review Form shown in Figure 1 assumes the existence of a General Design Safety Checklist that can serve as a foundation for the review process. Also, the example presumes two levels of review a preliminary review to identify items needing attention and a final sign-off. [Pg.236]

A. 2 Yes. Under 1926.403(a), all electrical conductors and equipment must be approved. The standard defines approved as acceptable. With regard to your equipment, acceptable means accepted, or certified, or listed, or labeled, or otherwise determined to be safe by a qualified testing laboratory capable of determining the suitability of materials and equipment for installation and use... [Pg.1393]

Protective equipment Accepting that the worker must work in an environment where the hazardous material is present and providing suitable protective equipment for the worker to wear. Examples for controlling dust hazard (in order of decreasing efficacy) are air-hne helmets - clean air is provided under pressure via flexible tubing to a full headset worn my the worker positive... [Pg.370]

If no agreement can be reached on the apphcation of the measures set out in subparagraphs 3.1.2 or 3.1.3 above, the inspected State Party may in very exceptional cases retain the equipment on-site, subject to its replacement with identical items of equipment acceptable to the Technical Secretariat or, if that is not feasible, reimbursement will be provided in accordance with the conditions set out in subparagraph 3.3 below. [Pg.230]

Even if the reactor temperature is controlled within acceptable limits, the reactor effluent may need to be cooled rapidly, or quenched, to stop the reaction quickly to prevent excessive byproduct formation. This quench can be accomplished by indirect heat transfer using conventional heat transfer equipment or by direct heat transfer by mixing with another fluid. A commonly encountered situation is... [Pg.42]

It obvious a today s demand on repetitive inspections to predict the safety of pressure equipments during the oncoming service period. The acceptance from the industry for this kind of testing is accessible, if you can fulfil this requirement an enlarge in this way the competitiveness. [Pg.34]

The verifications can be performed by the user himself, with electronic measurement equipment described in this project. The consequences of the application of future European standard are very important since is established a mandatory verification of each particular flaw detector, at least once a year. Their verification is to be performed according to a well defined procedure of measurement, including acceptance criteria for each parameter. [Pg.701]

After many decades of application, industry has completely accepted standard NDT as an inevitable but invaluable part of production and maintenance of components. Its application has been well-regulated, acceptance criteria for weld defects exist, good schemes for personnel qualification are in place and equipment has evolved to a standard of nearperfection. NDT has become a commodity. Pioneering years are over. [Pg.945]

Accepted NDT devices are entered in State register of mesurement equipment allowed for use on the territory of Belarus and the certificates of the device type are isssued. [Pg.964]

Liquid helium s use in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) continues to increase as the medical profession accepts and develops new uses for the equipment. This equipment has eliminated some need for exploratory surgery by accurately diagnosing patients. Another medical application uses MRE to determine (by blood analysis) whether a patient has any form of cancer. [Pg.8]

Analytical chemists make a distinction between calibration and standardization. Calibration ensures that the equipment or instrument used to measure the signal is operating correctly by using a standard known to produce an exact signal. Balances, for example, are calibrated using a standard weight whose mass can be traced to the internationally accepted platinum-iridium prototype kilogram. [Pg.47]

Table 1 is condensed from Handbook 44. It Hsts the number of divisions allowed for each class, eg, a Class III scale must have between 100 and 1,200 divisions. Also, for each class it Hsts the acceptance tolerances appHcable to test load ranges expressed in divisions (d) for example, for test loads from 0 to 5,000 d, a Class II scale has an acceptance tolerance of 0.5 d. The least ambiguous way to specify the accuracy for an industrial or retail scale is to specify an accuracy class and the number of divisions, eg. Class III, 5,000 divisions. It must be noted that this is not the same as 1 part in 5,000, which is another method commonly used to specify accuracy eg, a Class III 5,000 d scale is allowed a tolerance which varies from 0.5 d at zero to 2.5 d at 5,000 divisions. CaHbration curves are typically plotted as in Figure 12, which shows a typical 5,000-division Class III scale. The error tunnel (stepped lines, top and bottom) is defined by the acceptance tolerances Hsted in Table 1. The three caHbration curves belong to the same scale tested at three different temperatures. Performance must remain within the error tunnel under the combined effect of nonlinearity, hysteresis, and temperature effect on span. Other specifications, including those for temperature effect on zero, nonrepeatabiHty, shift error, and creep may be found in Handbook 44 (5). The acceptance tolerances in Table 1 apply to new or reconditioned equipment tested within 30 days of being put into service. After that, maintenance tolerances apply they ate twice the values Hsted in Table 1. Table 1 is condensed from Handbook 44. It Hsts the number of divisions allowed for each class, eg, a Class III scale must have between 100 and 1,200 divisions. Also, for each class it Hsts the acceptance tolerances appHcable to test load ranges expressed in divisions (d) for example, for test loads from 0 to 5,000 d, a Class II scale has an acceptance tolerance of 0.5 d. The least ambiguous way to specify the accuracy for an industrial or retail scale is to specify an accuracy class and the number of divisions, eg. Class III, 5,000 divisions. It must be noted that this is not the same as 1 part in 5,000, which is another method commonly used to specify accuracy eg, a Class III 5,000 d scale is allowed a tolerance which varies from 0.5 d at zero to 2.5 d at 5,000 divisions. CaHbration curves are typically plotted as in Figure 12, which shows a typical 5,000-division Class III scale. The error tunnel (stepped lines, top and bottom) is defined by the acceptance tolerances Hsted in Table 1. The three caHbration curves belong to the same scale tested at three different temperatures. Performance must remain within the error tunnel under the combined effect of nonlinearity, hysteresis, and temperature effect on span. Other specifications, including those for temperature effect on zero, nonrepeatabiHty, shift error, and creep may be found in Handbook 44 (5). The acceptance tolerances in Table 1 apply to new or reconditioned equipment tested within 30 days of being put into service. After that, maintenance tolerances apply they ate twice the values Hsted in Table 1.
PVDE is a nontoxic resin and may be safely used in articles intended for repeated contact with food (190). Based on studies under controked conditions, including acute oral, systemic, subchronic, and subacute contact implantation and tissue culture tests, no adverse toxicological or biological response has been found in test animals (191,192). PVDE is acceptable for use in processing and storage areas in contact with meat or poultry products prepared under federal inspection and it complies with the 3-A sanitary standards for dairy equipment. [Pg.388]

Cellular mbber has been used extensively as shoe soles, where its combination of cushioning abiUty and wear resistance, coupled with desirable economics, has led to very wide acceptance. In this case the cushioning properties are of minor importance compared with the abrasion resistance and cost. Other significant cushioning appHcations for cellular mbbers and latex foam mbbers are as carpet underlay and as cushion padding ia athletic equipment. [Pg.416]

Structural Components. In most appHcations stmctural foam parts are used as direct replacements for wood, metals, or soHd plastics and find wide acceptance in appHances, automobUes, furniture, materials-handling equipment, and in constmction. Use in the huil ding and constmction industry account for more than one-half of the total volume of stmctural foam appHcations. High impact polystyrene is the most widely used stmctural foam, foUowed by polypropylene, high density polyethylene, and poly(vinyl chloride). The constmction industry offers the greatest growth potential for ceUular plastics. [Pg.416]

As with all tests, frequent caUbration of the test equipment using standard hardness blocks is a prerequisite for rehable hardness testing (see ASTM E18). Standard hardness blocks are available through commercial sources in the United States but do not have traceabiUty to internationally accepted standards as in Europe. [Pg.465]


See other pages where Equipment acceptance is mentioned: [Pg.230]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.2352]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.2352]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.707]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.346]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.137 ]




SEARCH



Equipment acceptance-safety review forms

© 2024 chempedia.info