Enzyme immunoassay procedure

The enzyme immunoassay procedure [57] discussed in section 5.6.1.5 for the determination of polychlorobiphenyls in soils has also been applied to sediments. 

The analysis of fish tissues for ciguatoxin by a newly developed enzyme-immunoassay procedure (26, 27) has been carried out in this study. Three areas of examinations have been attempted (1) the examination of clinically defined and documented and non-toxic consumed fish samples (2) the assessment of freshly caught fishes from the sites in the Leeward part of the island of Oahu where ciguatoxin is found and (3) competitive inhibition with suspension of purified ciguatoxin and closely related structurally similar polyether toxins. 

The comparison of clinically defined and documented toxic with non-toxic consumed fishes by EIA clearly demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p <0.001) between the two populations. This result is similar to that reported for the radioimmunoassay and enzyme-immunoassay procedures (21, 22, 26-28). The assessment of the EIA with each species of fish samples caught in the Hawaiian waters presented positive and borderline frequency values comparable to that reported earlier by Ito and Uchida (28) by the RIA, and more recently by Kimura et al. (27) by the EIA. 

The critical factors in the enzyme-immunoassay procedure as indicated previously (26, 27) are as follows (1) the size and shape of the tissue samples should be uniform, and replicate samples from each area should be tested (2) the fixation step of the fish tissue with methyl or ethyl alcohol containing is essential... 

Diagrammatic representation of a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay procedure for the determination of low-molecular-weight compounds (haptens). 

Indirect competitive enzyme immunoassay procedure using antigen-coated solid phase... 

Using a simple solvent extraction procedure to minimize matrix effects, a diclofop-methyl immunoassay was developed for milk, a number of edible plant products, and other matrices. Gas chromatography (GC) and liquid scintillation counting (LSC) of a C-labeled analyte were used as reference methods to compare with enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results. The methods were well correlated, with comparison of EIA... 

Diagnostic procedures include dark-field microscopy12, non-treponemal exams10 (i.e., the Venereal Disease Laboratory and the rapid plasma reagin test), and treponemal exams (i.e., enzyme immunoassay, the T. pallidum hemagglutination test, the fluorescent treponemal antibody test, and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). 

A similar type of biotin-dendritic multimer also was used to boost sensitivity in DNA microarray detection by 100-fold over that obtainable using traditional avidin-biotin reagent systems (Stears, 2000 Striebel et al., 2004). With this system, a polyvalent biotin dendrimer is able to bind many labeled avidin or streptavidin molecules, which may carry enzymes or fluorescent probes for assay detection. In addition, if the biotinylated dendrimer and the streptavidin detection agent is added at the same time, then at the site of a captured analyte, the biotin-dendrimer conjugates can form huge multi-dendrimer complexes wherein avidin or streptavidin detection reagents bridge between more than one dendrimer. Thus, the use of multivalent biotin-dendrimers can become universal enhancers of DNA hybridization assays or immunoassay procedures. 

Pool the fractions containing antibody and immediately mix with an amount of maleimide-activated enzyme to obtain the desired molar ratio of antibody-to-enzyme in the conjugate. Use of a 4 1 (enzymerantibody) molar ratio in the conjugation reaction usually results in high-activity conjugates suitable for use in many enzyme-linked immunoassay procedures. Higher molar ratios also have been used with success. 

Liposome conjugates may be used in various immunoassay procedures. The lipid vesicle can provide a multivalent surface to accommodate numerous antigen-antibody interactions and thus increase the sensitivity of an assay. At the same time, it can function as a vessel to carry encapsulated detection components needed for the assay system. This type of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is called a liposome immunosorbent assay or LISA. One method of using liposomes in an immunoassay is to modify the surface so that it can interact to form biotin-avidin or biotin-streptavidin complexes. The avidin-biotin interaction can be used to increase detectability or sensitivity in immunoassay tests (Chapter 23) (Savage et al., 1992). 

Johnson and Van Emon [57] have described a quantitative enzyme based immunoassay procedure for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in soils and sediments and compared the results with those obtained by a gas chromatographic method. The soil is extracted with methanol, or Soxhlet extracted or extracted with a supercritical fluid. In the case of the latter two extractants good agreement was obtained between immunoassay and gas chromatographic methods. Spiking recoveries from soil achieved ranged from 104% (Aroclor 1248) to 107% (Aroclor 1242). Detection limits were 9pg kg-1 (Aroclor 1245) and 10.5pg kg-1 (Aroclor 1242). Chlorinated anisoles, benzenes or phenols did not interfere. 

Enzyme-Immunoassay Results with Clinically Documented Fishes. The data presented in Figure 1 indicate that the EIA procedure clearly differentiated between clinically documented toxic and non-toxic fishes of several different species (a) Parupeneus sp. (moana), 1 (b) shark, 1 (c) Sphyraena sp., 1 (d) Elagatis bipinnulatus (rainbow runner), 2 (e) Caranx sp. (Jack), 1 (f) Lutjanus sp. 

This protocol gives soluble colored reaction products used for enzyme immunoassays in test tubes. A procedure yielding insoluble reaction products is given in Protocol 2.5.4.2. 

An indirect enzyme immunoassay suitable for the determination of chloramphenicol and its glucuronide was developed for the analysis of urine, milk, tissue, and eggs as well (48). In this assay, chloramphenicol succinate was coupled to both bovine serum albumin and horseradish peroxidase by a mixed anhydride procedure. Unlike tissue and egg samples, urine and defatted milk could be directly analyzed, but when an ethyl acetate extraction was employed in milk analysis, the limit of detection was lowered at least 10 times. 

Unlike clenbuterol, salbutamol is a difficult compound to analyze due to its particular chemical attributes. It is a basic compound subjected to protein binding poor recoveries are obtained especially when protein precipitation techniques are used to prepare the extracts (145). In addition, salbutamol is charged at all pH values and does not readily lend itself to simple, specific back-extracting procedures. This severely restricts the options of sample cleanup. However, a Subtilisin protease digestion step followed by acid clarification and solid-phase extraction has been suggested (146) as an adequate extraction and cleanup procedure prior to the end-point determination of salbutamol by an enzyme immunoassay (139) based on the cross-reactivity of anticlenbuterol antibodies. 

A generic enzyme immunoassay for the determination of several synthetic corticosteroids including dexamethasone, betamethasone, flumethasone, triamcinolone, prednisolone, and methylprednisolone in milk, liver, kidney, and muscle samples was recently developed (156). Antibodies raised against dexamethasone-21-hemisuccinate-bovine serum albumin were used in this assay, whereas dexa-methasone-horseradish peroxidase was the label conjugate. Skimmed milk could be directly screened for the presence of corticosteroids at limits of detection of 0.1 ppb for dexamethasone, betamethasone, and flumethasone, 0.3 ppb for triamcinolone and 0.5 ppb for prednisolone. Tissue samples were submitted, prior to the immunoassay, to an extraction/cleanup procedure involving liquid-liquid partitions with acetonitrile-water followed by hexane-chloroform. Background values for bovine liver, swine kidney, and calf muscle were determined to be 0.26, 0.26, and 0.07 ppb, respectively, of dexamethasone equivalents. 

As mentioned earlier, the immunoassay can be done with a number of procedural modifications and in this instance one must substitute the isotope with another molecule (fluorescent dye, magnetic particle, enzyme) which can be measured and therefore serve as the source of tracer. For our initial studies we have chosen to use the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) system. At the present time the EIA is still in its infancy and although a number of successful EIA s have been developed the method cannot be considered a panacea (34). The future of this assay appears to be very bright and exciting, and there is considerable interest in the application of the EIA to problems in both microbiology and clinical medicine (34). Many of the procedures and protocols are derived from RIA procedures and the EIA, like the RIA, has the potential to be performed in a multitude of procedural variations but, for the purpose of this manuscript we will describe only the system we have chosen for our use. 

---