Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Competition indirect

Figure 4 Allergenic activity of the EPM products produced from different proteolytic hydrolysates of buffalo s milk proteins. (I) Buffalo s milk proteins (control) (2) EPM product produced from the chymotryptic hydrolysate without amino acid enrichment (3,4,5,6,7) (a-chymotryptic) EPM products with different Met enrichments (8) a-chymotryptic product produced from the a-chymotryptic and tryptic hydrolysate (without amino acid enrichment) (9,l0,l 1,12,13) a-chymotryptic EPM products with different Met enrichments produced from a peptic and tryptic hydrolysate of buffalo milk proteins. The allergenic activity of the samples was measured in vitro by competitive indirect ELISA. Figure 4 Allergenic activity of the EPM products produced from different proteolytic hydrolysates of buffalo s milk proteins. (I) Buffalo s milk proteins (control) (2) EPM product produced from the chymotryptic hydrolysate without amino acid enrichment (3,4,5,6,7) (a-chymotryptic) EPM products with different Met enrichments (8) a-chymotryptic product produced from the a-chymotryptic and tryptic hydrolysate (without amino acid enrichment) (9,l0,l 1,12,13) a-chymotryptic EPM products with different Met enrichments produced from a peptic and tryptic hydrolysate of buffalo milk proteins. The allergenic activity of the samples was measured in vitro by competitive indirect ELISA.
Antagonist An antagonist is a receptor ligand preventing the action of an agonist, in a direct (competitive) or indirect (allosteric) manner. [Pg.599]

Direct conversion of natural gas to Hquids has been actively researched. Process economics are highly variable and it is unclear whether direct natural gas conversion technologies are competitive with the estabUshed indirect processes. Some emerging technologies in this area are presented herein. [Pg.86]

Fig. 9. Immunosensor approaches where A is the analyte, is the labeled analyte, and Y is the antibody, (a) Direct immunosensors where the actual antigen—antibody interaction is measured (b) indirect immunosensors 1 and 2 which utilize formats similar to competitive and displacement... Fig. 9. Immunosensor approaches where A is the analyte, is the labeled analyte, and Y is the antibody, (a) Direct immunosensors where the actual antigen—antibody interaction is measured (b) indirect immunosensors 1 and 2 which utilize formats similar to competitive and displacement...
The results obtained demonstrate competition between the entropy favouring binding at bumps and the potential most likely to favour binding at dips of the surface. For a range of pairwise-additive, power-law interactions, it was found that the effect of the potential dominates, but in the (non-additive) limit of a surface of much higher dielectric constant than in solution the entropy effects win. Thus, the preferential binding of the polymer to the protuberances of a metallic surface was predicted [22]. Besides, this theory indirectly assumes the occupation of bumps by the weakly attracted neutral macromolecules capable of covalent interaction with surface functions. [Pg.140]

The following is a generic description of the immobilized antigen ELISA (Figure 2), commonly termed indirect competitive immunoassay, on a microtiter plate. [Pg.625]

Another commonly used ELISA format is the immobilized antibody assay or direct competitive assay (Eigure 3). The primary anti-analyte antibody is immobilized on the solid phase and the analyte competes with a known amount of enzyme-labeled hapten for binding sites on the immobilized antibody. Eirst, the anti-analyte antibody is adsorbed on the microtiter plate wells. In the competition step, the analyte and enzyme-labeled hapten are added to microtiter plate wells and unbound materials are subsequently washed out. The enzyme substrate is then added for color production. Similarly to indirect competitive immunoassay, absorption is inversely proportional to the concentration of analyte. The direct competitive ELISA format is commonly used in commercial immunoassay test kits. [Pg.626]

Direct and indirect competition formats, illustrated in Figure 1, are widely used for both qualitative and quantitative immunoassays. Direct competition immunoassays employ wells, tubes, beads, or membranes (supports) on to which antibodies have been coated and in which proteins such as bovine semm albumin, fish gelatin, or powdered milk have blocked nonspecific binding sites. Solutions containing analyte (test solution) and an analyte-enzyme conjugate are added, and the analyte and antibody are allowed to compete for the antibody binding sites. The system is washed, and enzyme substrates that are converted to a chromophore or fluorophore by the enzyme-tracer complex are added. Subsequent color or fluorescence development is inversely proportionate to the analyte concentration in the test solution. For this assay format, the proper orientation of the coated antibody is important, and anti-host IgG or protein A or protein G has been utilized to orient the antibody. Immunoassays developed for commercial purposes generally employ direct competition formats because of their simplicity and short assay times. The price for simplicity and short assay time is more complex development needed for a satisfactory incorporation of the label into the antibody or analyte without loss of sensitivity. [Pg.681]

Figure 1 Schematic sequence of the direct and indirect competitive ELISA. The principle difference is that for direct competitive immunoassay, the well is coated with primary antibody directly, and for indirect competitive immunoassay, the well is coated with antigen. Primary antibody (Y), blocking protein (Y), analyte (T), analyte-tracer ( ), enzyme labeled secondary antibody ), color development ( J)... Figure 1 Schematic sequence of the direct and indirect competitive ELISA. The principle difference is that for direct competitive immunoassay, the well is coated with primary antibody directly, and for indirect competitive immunoassay, the well is coated with antigen. Primary antibody (Y), blocking protein (Y), analyte (T), analyte-tracer ( ), enzyme labeled secondary antibody ), color development ( J)...
Parks and Rice (5 ) found that some soil algae are inhibited by rhizome extracts. This suggested that johnsongrass s competitive ability may be increased by it s ability to influence the soil microflora and thereby indirectly affect other higher plants. [Pg.210]

If mycorrhizae are sites of action for allelochemicals, this is an important indirect aspect of allelopathic interaction among plants. Inhibition of mycorrhizal formation or a reduction in the efficiency of mycorrhizal association would reduce the nutrient level of the mycorrhizal plant and subsequently its competitiveness, stress tolerance or nodulation. Although allelochemicals have been implicated in the reduction of nodulation and nodule size, possible mycorrhizal involvement has not been examined. This is a difficult area of research but one that will provide better understanding of this complex situation. [Pg.313]

The formation of 151 from the phosphonate 171 could be proved only by indirect means. Electron-rich aromatic compounds such as N,N-diethylaniline and N,N,N, N -tetraethyl-m-phenylenediamine U0 1I9> and N-methylaniline 120> are phosphorylated in the para- and in the ortho- plus para-positions by 151. Furthermore, 151 also adds to the nitrogen lone pair of aniline to form the corresponding phosphor-amidate. Considerable competition between nucleophiles of various strengths for the monomeric methyl metaphosphate 151 — e.g. aromatic substitution of N,N-diethylaniline and reaction with methanol or aromatic substitution and reaction with the nitrogen lone pair in N-methylaniline — again underline its extraordinary non-selectivity. [Pg.112]

II. Active carrier-mediated Flux is saturable with increasing concentration. Competitive substrates. Flux may be asymmetrical. Flux can be against an electrochemical gradient. Energy dependent—directly or indirectly coupled. Substrate specificity, competition, saturation. Flux is asymmetrical. [Pg.237]


See other pages where Competition indirect is mentioned: [Pg.746]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.835]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.2075]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.835]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.2075]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.1107]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.683]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.163]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.119 ]




SEARCH



Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay indirect competitive

Indirect competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Indirect competitive ELISA

Indirect competitive enzyme-linked

© 2024 chempedia.info