Indirect enzyme immunoassay procedure

An indirect enzyme immunoassay suitable for the determination of chloramphenicol and its glucuronide was developed for the analysis of urine, milk, tissue, and eggs as well (48). In this assay, chloramphenicol succinate was coupled to both bovine serum albumin and horseradish peroxidase by a mixed anhydride procedure. Unlike tissue and egg samples, urine and defatted milk could be directly analyzed, but when an ethyl acetate extraction was employed in milk analysis, the limit of detection was lowered at least 10 times. 

Indirect Enzyme Immunoassays. Picloram standards in Pi buffer were used to generate standard curves for comparison of two indirect EIA procedures in which polyconal and monoclonal antibodies were used, respectively. A linear relation between the log of picloram concentration and relative absorbance (A/A0) was found in the range 5 to 5000 ng/mL for the polyclonal assay and 1 to 200 ng/mL for the monoclonal assay (Figure 2). The monoclonal assay, therefore, had a standard curve with a much steeper slope compared to the polyclonal assay. Typical coefficient of determination values (r ) were 0.97 for the monoclonal assay and 0.95 for the polyclonal assay. 

Indirect competitive enzyme immunoassay procedure using antigen-coated solid phase... 

A partially purified Bacillus thurlnglensis var. israelensls (Bti) 6-endotoxin was used to Immunize rabbits. The antisera obtained have an improved specificity towards the mosquito larvacidal activity of the toxin, as opposed to antiserum raised when the whole crystal was used as immunogen. Using a two step/indirect ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) procedure developed in our laboratory, fourteen experimental formulations were tested, and the results were compared with bioassays. An average of 69.1 international units 20% c.v. was found to associate with each ug of toxin detected by the ELISA. Our data indicate that when toxin specific antisera are available, Immunoassays can be used to predict the biological activity of Bti samples with reasonable accuracy. 

Methods very similar to classical immunoassays in the sandwich format are easily implemented in flow systems (Fig. 2d). In this type of noncompetitive assays, again, antigen is captured and concentrated from an appropriate volume of sample on an immunosorbent (-Abi) column while nonantigenic components are eluted. Subsequent to the capture step, labeled second antibody (Abj-label) is introduced into the mobile phase and swept into the column, where it binds to the -Ab]-Ag complex to form -Ab -Ag-Ab2-label. Unbound Ab2-label is swept from the column, and when the label is an enzyme, antigen is quantitated indirectly by conducting an enzyme assay in the column. After substrate incubation, the reaction product is transported to a detector at the column terminus. Ag and Ab2-label can be introduced in the column sequentially or simultaneously. In some instances both modes led to similar sensitivity [55], and in other cases simultaneous injection produced a greater response than sequential injection [56]. The term sandwich has also been applied to the procedure carried out to quantitate Ab by capturing a complex Ab-Ag-label onto a protein G capillary column [57]. In this case detection is performed after elution. 

---