Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Emission refuse

There are numerous misconceptions about the sources of various chemical elements in waste, particularly those that are potential acid formers when the waste is incinerated or mechanically converted and used as a refuse-derived fuel. For example, it is often mistakenly stated that the source of chlorine in waste, hence a potential source of HCl emissions, is poly(vinyl chloride). The relative contents of selected, potentially acid-forming elements in the organic portion of a sample of waste collected from various households in one U.S. East Coast city is given in Table 2 (17). In this city, a chief source of chlorine in the waste is NaCl, probably from food waste. [Pg.543]

Air Emission Tests at Commerce Refuse to Energy Facility, May 26—June 5, 1987, Vol. I, ESA 20522 449, Energy Systems Associates, Pittsburgh, Pa., July 1987. [Pg.512]

Human-made sources cover a wide spectrum of chemical and physical activities and are the major contributors to urban air pollution. Air pollutants in the United States pour out from over 10 million vehicles, the refuse of over 250 million people, the generation of billions of kilowatts of electricity, and the production of innumerable products demanded by eveiyday living. Hundreds of millions of tons of air pollutants are generated annu ly in the United States alone. The five main classes of pollutants are particulates, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and carbon monoxide. Total emissions in the United States are summarized by source categoiy for the year 1993 in Table 25-10. [Pg.2172]

Chemical Volume Reduction Incineration has been the method commonly used to reduce the volume of wastes chemically. One of the most attractive features of the incineration process is that it can be used to reduce the original volume of combustible sohd wastes by 80 to 90 percent. The technology of incineration has advanced since 1960 with many mass burn facihties now have two or more combustors with capacities of 1000 tons per day of refuse per unit. However, regiila-tions of metal and dioxin emissions have resulted in higher costs and operating complexity. [Pg.2242]

Even though society has moved toward centralized industries and utilities, we still have many personal sources of air pollution for which we alone can answer—(1) automobiles, (2) home furnaces, (3) home fireplaces and stoves, (4) backyard barbecue grills, and (5) open burning of refuse and leaves. Figure 6-4 illustrates the personal emissions of a typical U.S. family. [Pg.77]

Contaminant Power plant emission (gm/kg fuel) Refuse burning emission (gm. kg refuse) Uncontrolled automotive emiSHon (gm/kg fuel) ... [Pg.82]

Ausschuss, m. refuse, scrap, w te (Paper) broke culls committee shooting out, emission. [Pg.50]

Diverse techniques have been employed to identify the sources of elements in atmospheric dust (and surface dust) (Table V). Some involve considering trends in concentration and others use various statistical methods. The degree of sophistication and detail obtained from the analyses increases from top left to bottom right of the Table. The sources identified as contributing the elements in rural and urban atmospheric dusts are detailed in Table VI. The principal sources are crustal material, soil, coal and oil combustion emissions, incinerated refuse emissions, motor vehicle emissions, marine spray, cement and concrete weathering, mining and metal working emissions. Many elements occur in more than one source, and they are classified in the... [Pg.126]

Abstract Looking for the possibility of using Refused Derived Fuels (RDF) in the substitution of fossil fuels is one of the main subjects in the Waste to Energy aspect. Therefore this study has been taken in this direction. The influence of waste composition on RDF quality produced by Dry Stabilization Process (DSP) and the evaluation of C02 emission of this product were undertaken. [Pg.441]

Keywords Refused Derived Fuels (RDF), Dry Stabilization Process (DSP), Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Waste composition, Waste amount, Heating value, Emission Factor (EF)... [Pg.441]

This study aims to look for the possibility of producing refuse-derived fuel (RDF) according to dry stabilization process (DSP) and investigates the possibility of substitution of fossil fuels by RDF. With that, this study tried to assess the risk of C02 emissions from RDF produced by MS W Hanoi, compared with C02 emissions from fossil fuels. [Pg.442]

The presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the environment is of obvious concern and, apart from specific occupational environments, human exposure to these compounds derives from combustion products released into the atmosphere. Estimates of the total annual benzo[aJpyrene emissions in the United States range from 900 tons (19) to about 1300 tons (20). These totals are derived from heat and power generation (37-38%), open-refuse burning (42-46%), coke production (15-19%) and motor vehicle emissions (1-1.5%) (19,20). Since the vast majority of these emissions are from stationary sources, local levels of air pollution obviously vary. Benzo[aJpyrene levels of less than 1 pg/1,000 m correspond to clean air (20). At this level, it can be estimated that the average person would inhale about 0.02 pg of benzo[aJpyrene per day, and this could increase to 1.5 pg/day in polluted air (21). [Pg.10]

Table 5-1 lists the air releases from facilities in the United States that produce, process, or use nickel and its compounds, according to the 1993 TRI (TRI93 1995). These releases, totaling 285,857 pounds (129,935 kg), constitute 37.5% of the environmental releases reported in the TRI. However, since the TRI does not include emissions from power plants and refuse and sludge incinerators, its estimate of U.S. nickel emissions is incomplete. [Pg.179]

Hopke, et al. (4) and Gaarenstroom, Perone, and Moyers (7) used the common factor analysis approach in their analyses of the Boston and Tucson area aerosol composition, respectively. In the Boston data, for 90 samples at a variety of sites, six common factors were identified that were interpreted as soil, sea salt, oil-fired power plants, motor vehicles, refuse incineration and an unknown manganese-selenium source. The six factors accounted for about 78 of the system variance. There was also a high unique factor for bromine that was interpreted to be fresh automobile exhaust. Large unique factors for antimony and selenium were found. These factors may possibly represent emission of volatile species whose concentrations do not oovary with other elements emitted by the same source. [Pg.28]

Results For the St. Louis data, the target transformation analysis results for the fine fraction without July Uth and 5th are given in table 6. The presence of a motor vehicle source, a sulfur source, a soil or flyash source, a titanium source, and a zinc source are indicated. The sulfur, titanium and zinc factors were determined from the simple initial test vectors for those elements. The concentration of sulfur was not related to any other elements and represents a secondary sulfate aerosol resulting from the conversion of primary sulfur oxide emissions. Titanium was found to be associated with sulfur, calcium, iron, and barium. Rheingrover ( jt) identified the source of titanium as a paint-pigment factory located to the south of station 112. The zinc factor, associated with the elements chlorine, potassium, iron and lead, is attributed to refuse incinerator emissions. This factor could also represent particles from zinc and/or lead smelters, though a high chlorine concentration is usually associated with particles from refuse incinerators ( ). The sulfur concentration in the refined sulfate factor is consistent with that of ammonium sulfate. The calculated lead concentration in the motor vehicle factor of ten percent and a lead to bromine ratio of about 0.28 are typical of values reported in the literature (25). The concentration of lead in... [Pg.37]

Motor vehicle emissions account for another 15 . The measured lead concentration is divided among the refuse and motor vehicle factors. [Pg.43]

Here the lead contribution is 70 from motor vehicle emissions and 10 from refuse incinerators. In the coarse fraction, the two crustal components account for 80 of the total mass. [Pg.43]

The Clean Air Act of 1990 has made trace metal content in fuels and wastes the final ash-related compositional characteristic of significance. Considerable attention is paid (ca 1993) to emissions of such metals as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, silver, and zinc. The concentration of these metals in both grate ash and flyash is of significance as a result of federal and state requirements of particular importance is the mobility of metals. This mobility, and the consequent toxicity of the ash product, is determined by the Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (tclp) test. Tables 8—10 present trace metal contents for wood wastes and agricultural wastes, municipal waste, and refuse-derived fuel, respectively. In Table 8, the specific concentration of various components in the RDF governs the expected average concentration of trace metals. [Pg.55]

Beychok MR. 1987. A data base of dioxin and furan emissions from municipal refuse incinerators. Atmos Environ 21 29-36. [Pg.589]

The economics of reducing carbon emissions would be simple if all countries accepted binding emission caps, but at the 2007 UN conference in Bali, the United States and China refused to make a firm commitment to reduce emissions because they do not want to raise the prices of their products. The United States has agreed only to further negotiations. [Pg.35]

Less-developed nations such as China believe that the industrial nations polluted their way into prosperity and became concerned about environmental damage only after their economies had already matured. Therefore, they feel it is unfair that the industrial nations—which did and are still emitting most of the greenhouse gases—should expect the less-developed ones to curtail their economic development to cut global carbon emissions. At the 2007 UN conference in Bali, China and India continued to refuse limiting their emissions. [Pg.36]

An unexpected new development is that the EPA refused to give permission to the states to set their standards on C02 emission higher than that of the federal government. This decision was praised by the car manufacturers, but the 17 states have sued the EPA to overturn the decision in the courts. [Pg.41]


See other pages where Emission refuse is mentioned: [Pg.194]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.1343]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.1343]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.1062]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.37]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.37 ]




SEARCH



Incinerator emissions refuse

Refuse

© 2024 chempedia.info