Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Contamination type

Figure 13-9a shows the relative separation of the full-film, mixed-film, and boundary. If a full-film exists, the bearing life is almost infinite. The limitation in the case of full-film is due to lubricant breakdown, shock load, bearing surface erosion, and fretting of bearing components. Figures 13-9b and 13-9c are cross sections showing the various contamination types. Oil additives are contaminants that form beneficial surface films. [Pg.481]

The design of a phytoremediation system is determined by several factors associated with the contaminants (type, concentration, and depth), the conditions at the site, the plants, the level of cleanup required and the available time. Extraction techniques have different design requirements than immobilization or degradation methods. Nevertheless, it is possible to specify a few design factors that are a part of most phytoremediation efforts. [Pg.553]

Frequent changes in contaminant type and concentration in the feed soil can disrupt the efficiency of the soil-washing process. To accommodate changes in the chemical or physical composition of the feed soil, modifications to the wash fluid formulation and the operating settings may be required. Alternatively, additional feedstock preparation steps, such as blending soils to provide a consistent feedstock may be appropriate.77,83... [Pg.563]

Most water systems are required to monitor for radioactivity and certain radionuclides, and to meet maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for these contaminants, to comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Currently, USEPA requires drinking water to meet MCLs for beta/photon emitters (includes gamma radiation), alpha particles, combined radium 226/228, and uranium. However, this monitoring is required only at entry points into the system. In addition, after the initial sampling requirements, only one sample is required every three to nine years, depending on the contaminant type and the initial concentrations. [Pg.203]

Contaminant Type Specific Type Possible Sources... [Pg.182]

Table 3.6. The range of CIP agents often used to clean/sanitize chromatographic columns. Most CIP protocols would make use of two or more of these agents, allowing them to sequentially percolate through the column at a slow flow rate. Contact time can range from several minutes to overnight. NaOH is particularly effective at removing most contaminant types... Table 3.6. The range of CIP agents often used to clean/sanitize chromatographic columns. Most CIP protocols would make use of two or more of these agents, allowing them to sequentially percolate through the column at a slow flow rate. Contact time can range from several minutes to overnight. NaOH is particularly effective at removing most contaminant types...
TechXtract is an extraction technology that has been used to remove a variety of contaminants from the surfaces of concrete, steel, brick, and other materials. Target contaminant types include organics, heavy metals, radionuclides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The technology uses proprietary chemical formulations in successive steps to remove these contaminants. The process employs as many as 25 different components in 3 separate chemical formulations that are applied to the contaminated surface and then removed in a multi-step, multicycle sequence. TechXtract is commercially available and has been used at multiple sites. [Pg.323]

The costs of the EPOC Water, Inc. (EPOC) microfiltration technology are affected by system flow rates, amount of recycle, contaminant type and concentration, reagent type and amount, and the type and size of dewatering equipment used (D11314U, p. 15). [Pg.581]

The efficiency of the system is dependent on the soil type, contaminant type, and contaminant concentrations. Many sites require that an impermeable barrier or containment wall be constructed to prevent the continued migration of pollutants through soil and water. The treatment area must be clear of underground obstructions. Treatment is generally limited to soil less than 40 ft deep. More energy may be required to achieve contaminant removal in saturated soils. [Pg.692]

The vendor claims the above cost is an approximate range. Actual costs will vary from site to site depending upon such variables as contaminant type and concentration and soil type (personal communication Dr. Roy Crowther, Enviro FX, November 1997). [Pg.819]

A primary limitation of phytoremediation is that it takes time, and several growing seasons may be required to achieve treatment goals. Phytoremediation is also limited by the depth of the roots. The contaminants to be treated must reside in the top 3 to 6 ft of soil or, in the case of groundwater, the water table can be no more than 10 ft below ground surface. The creation of a process waste stream may also be seen as a limitation. In cases where the plant takes up and stores the contaminant, the plant may be considered a hazardous waste (depending on the contaminant type and concentrations in the plant matter). [Pg.864]

In general, it is not possible to differentiate among the thermal desorbers based on cost. The costs are scale dependent, ranging from 90 to 130 per ton ( 99 to 143 per metric ton) for a 1000-ton (907-metric ton) site to 40 to 70 ( 44 to 77 per metric ton) for a 10,000-ton (9070-metric ton) site for mobile systems treating petroleum-contaminated soils and from 300 to 600 per ton ( 331 to 661 per metric ton) for a 1000-ton (907-metric ton) site to 150 to 200 ( 165 to 220 per metric ton) for a 10,000-ton (9070-metric ton) site mobile system operating at a Superfund site. Matrix moisture and contaminant type are critical parameters in analyzing desorption costs (D12901B, p. 2.5). [Pg.904]

Unit cost data from various vendors of the solvent extraction technology is shown in Table 1. Estimates of unit costs of the systems ranged from 95 to 700/ton. This estimate includes the cost of disposal and destruction or treatment of all residue, analyses associated with system operations, and mobilization and demobilization. According to vendors, costs can vary substantially depending on the contaminant type and concentration, the media, and the quantity of material to be treated (D11243W, p. 5.3). [Pg.987]

A vendor of BioSolve technology states that the contaminant type and concentration, the amount of soil to be treated, and other site conditions will impact treatment costs (D171017, p. 1). Documents provided by the vendor indicate that the total cost of bioremediation using BioSolve can range from 25 to 90/yd of soil treated (D14680P, p. 93). Subsequent communication from the vendor stated that for remediation applications the cost of BioSolve was 1 to 5/yd of soil treated (personal communication, Jim Figueira, Western States BioSolve, October 1997). [Pg.1050]

For any activated carbon system, the capital costs will be dependent on contaminant types and concentration as well as treatment goals. Capital costs will also increase in cold-weather climates, since systems may require buried piping, heating, and housing units. The major contributors to operations and maintenance (O M) costs are treatment/replacement of spent carbon, disposal of residuals, and monitoring effluent concentrations (D11022L, p. 11-100). Also, activated carbon systems are usually part of a treatment train. Treatment costs will be highly dependent on the other systems used to deliver the contaminants to the activated carbon unit. [Pg.1083]

Is effective on a wide variety of contaminant types and concentrations. [Pg.1092]

Blanks consist of deionised water that is carried through all or part of the sampling and analytical processes to provide an indication of contamination. Types of blank sample include both laboratory and field blanks, listed below in ascending order of cumulative potential contamination. [Pg.50]

Areal Extent of Contamination Type of Contamination Concentration of Contaminants Imperviousness of Underlying Strata Aquifier Characteristics... [Pg.83]

Drum Contents and Condition Level of Subsurface Contamination Type of Contamination... [Pg.83]

For clean out of the extruder at shutdown, disassemble the crosshead and clean it while still hot. Remove the die, and gear pump if used, and remove as much plastic as possible by scraping with a copper spatula or brushing with a copper wire brush. Remove all heaters, thermocouples, pressure transducers, and so on. Consider using an exhaust duct system above the disassembly and cleaning area, even if the plastic is not a contaminating type. This procedure keeps the area clean and safe. [Pg.243]

Several pentacoordinate monohydrido complexes can add solvents are nnsnitable since the hydrido complexes produced an additional, small, nentral ligand to form complexes of the may reduce them with formation of HCl and contaminate type [RhHX2L2L ]. The dihydrido complexes are conveniently the product with monohydrido complexes (see Scheme 16). prepared by the oxidative addition of dihydrogen to rhodium(I) A characteristic stoichiometric reaction of many dihydrides is... [Pg.4074]

Glucose oxidase (GO) any purified preparation containing the lowest possible catalase contamination. Type VII from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis Missouri) is satisfactory. Weigh out and dilute just before use. [Pg.330]

Steam st ripping — This technique has long been used on sour water and process condensate in refineries. Steam stripping is also becoming more attractive in other industries as the demand for water conservation increases. In a number of process plants, high-quality process condensates are recovered, stripped, and reused. Effluent oil concentrations of less than 50 ppm are achievable in stripping columns but actual concentration depends on influent concentration, tower design and contaminant type. [Pg.54]

This paper presents a survey of the principal selective hydrogenation catalyst contaminants and their sources. The particular special cases of Hg and As are discussed. More recently silicon poisoning has become important. This subject will also be addressed. For each contaminant type, the IFP solution to suppress the undesirable effects will be detailed on the basis of results obtained in industrial plants. [Pg.447]

One potential application is the use of neural networks to facilitate decisions about hazardous waste sites. These sites generate a great deal of data, in which patterns are inherent. Sites that once produced batteries, for example, will typically show a great deal of cadmium in the soil this finding usually leads to a decision about a particular form of remediation. A network s input layer could represent characteristics of hazardous sites (such as type of site, volume of contamination, type of contaminants, contaminated media, etc.), and its output units could correspond to possible decisions regarding methods of cleanup. Such a network could be trained and tested on RODS (Records of Decision) to establish the appropriate relationships and assess the network s accuracy. [Pg.71]

Contaminant Type Typical military explosives include TNT, RDX, HMX, TNB, and 2,4-DNT. [Pg.158]

Uptake rates may also differ with age. Young children, for example, absorb lead via the gastro-intestinal tract four to five times more efficiently than adults, which makes them more susceptible to the effects of lead. Certainly much work remains to be done on soil contaminant uptake rates but current research illustrates that uptake rates are highly variable and dependent on a range of factors such as the contaminant type, physical and chemical properties of the soil, residence time in the gut etc. [Pg.70]


See other pages where Contamination type is mentioned: [Pg.332]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.872]    [Pg.1090]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.804]    [Pg.957]    [Pg.126]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.145 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.223 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.223 ]




SEARCH



Anode contamination catalyst types

Bisphenol-type contaminants

Contaminants types

Particulate and Film-type Surface Contamination

Types of Air Contaminants

© 2024 chempedia.info