Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Contact mechanical properties

Accessing Contact Mechanical Properties of Ultrathin Biomaterial... [Pg.183]

Copper and nickel can be alloyed with zinc to form nickel silvers. Nickel silvers are ductile, easily formed and machined, have good corrosion resistance, can be worked to provide a range of mechanical properties, and have an attractive white color. These alloys are used for ornamental purposes, as sHverplated and uncoated tableware and flatware in the electrical iadustry as contacts, connections, and springs and as many formed and machined parts (see Electrical connectors). [Pg.6]

Hard lenses can be defined as plastic lenses that contain no water, have moduli in excess of 5 MPa (500 g/mm ), and have T well above the temperature of the ocular environment. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) has excellent optical and mechanical properties and scratch resistance and was the first and only plastic used as a hard lens material before higher oxygen-permeable materials were developed. PMMA lenses also show excellent wetting in the ocular environment even though they are hydrophobic, eg, the contact angle is 66°. [Pg.101]

The wide use of microhardness testing recently prompted Oliver (1993) to design a mechanical properties microprobe ( nanoprobe would have been a better name), which generates indentations considerably less than a micrometre in depth. Loads up to 120 mN (one mN 0.1 g weight) can be applied, but a tenth of that amount is commonly used and hardness is estimated by electronically measuring the depth of impression while the indentor is still in contact. This allows, inter alia, measurement... [Pg.244]

Another manifestation of a time dependence to particle adhesion involves the phenomenon of total engulfment of the particle by the substrate. It is recognized that both the JKR and MP theories of adhesion assume that the contact radius a is small compared to the particle radius R. Realistically, however, that may not be the case. Rather, the contact radius depends on the work of adhesion between the two materials, as well as their mechanical properties such as the Young s modulus E or yield strength Y. Accordingly, there is no fundamental reason why the contact radius cannot be the same size as the particle radius. For the sake of the present discussion, let us ignore some mathematical complexities and simply assume that both the JKR and MP theories can be simply expanded to include large contact radii. Let us further assume that, under conditions of no externally applied load, the contact and particle radii are equal, that is a(0) = R. Under these conditions, Eq. 29 reduces to... [Pg.181]

As is true for macroscopic adhesion and mechanical testing experiments, nanoscale measurements do not a priori sense the intrinsic properties of surfaces or adhesive junctions. Instead, the measurements reflect a combination of interfacial chemistry (surface energy, covalent bonding), mechanics (elastic modulus, Poisson s ratio), and contact geometry (probe shape, radius). Furthermore, the probe/sample interaction may not only consist of elastic deformations, but may also include energy dissipation at the surface and/or in the bulk of the sample (or even within the measurement apparatus). Study of rate-dependent adhesion and mechanical properties is possible with both nanoindentation and... [Pg.193]

Perhaps the most significant complication in the interpretation of nanoscale adhesion and mechanical properties measurements is the fact that the contact sizes are below the optical limit ( 1 t,im). Macroscopic adhesion studies and mechanical property measurements often rely on optical observations of the contact, and many of the contact mechanics models are formulated around direct measurement of the contact area or radius as a function of experimentally controlled parameters, such as load or displacement. In studies of colloids, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used to view particle/surface contact sizes from the side to measure contact radius [3]. However, such a configuration is not easily employed in AFM and nanoindentation studies, and undesirable surface interactions from charging or contamination may arise. For adhesion studies (e.g. Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) [4] and probe-tack tests [5,6]), the probe/sample contact area is monitored as a function of load or displacement. This allows evaluation of load/area or even stress/strain response [7] as well as comparison to and development of contact mechanics theories. Area measurements are also important in traditional indentation experiments, where hardness is determined by measuring the residual contact area of the deformation optically [8J. For micro- and nanoscale studies, the dimensions of both the contact and residual deformation (if any) are below the optical limit. [Pg.194]

The above measurements all rely on force and displacement data to evaluate adhesion and mechanical properties. As mentioned in the introduction, a very useful piece of information to have about a nanoscale contact would be its area (or radius). Since the scale of the contacts is below the optical limit, the techniques available are somewhat limited. Electrical resistance has been used in early contact studies on clean metal surfaces [62], but is limited to conducting interfaces. Recently, Enachescu et al. [63] used conductance measurements to examine adhesion in an ideally hard contact (diamond vs. tungsten carbide). In the limit of contact size below the electronic mean free path, but above that of quantized conductance, the contact area scales linearly with contact conductance. They used these measurements to demonstrate that friction was proportional to contact area, and the area vs. load data were best-fit to a DMT model. [Pg.201]

Additional suggested resources for the reader include introductory articles on scanning probe techniques for materials properties measurement [82,83J. A comprehensive manual describing various surface preparation techniques, experimental procedures and instrumentation is also a good resource [84J, although the more recent modulation based techniques are not covered. Key textbooks include Johnson s on contact mechanics [51J and Israelachvili s on surface forces [18J, as well as a treatment of JKR/DMT issues by Maugis [85J. [Pg.206]

We have recently been exploring this technique to evaluate the adhesive and mechanical properties of compliant polymers in the form of a nanoscale JKR test. The force and stiffness data from a force-displacement curve can be plotted simultaneously (Fig. 13). For these contacts, the stiffness response appears to follow the true contact stiffness, and the curve was fit (see [70]) to a JKR model. Both the surface energy and modulus can be determined from the curve. Using JKR analyses, the maximum pull off force, surface energy and tip radius are... [Pg.210]

Depth-sensing nanoindentation is one of the primary tools for nanomechanical mechanical properties measurements. Major advantages to this technique over AFM include (1) simultaneous measurement of force and displacement (2) perpendicular tip-sample approach and (3) well-modeled mechanics for dynamic measurements. Also, the ability to quantitatively infer contact area during force-displacement measurements provides a very useful approach to explore adhesion mechanics and models. Disadvantages relative to AFM include lower force resolution, as well as far lower spatial resolution, both from the larger tip radii employed and a lack of sample positioning and imaging capabilities provided by piezoelectric scanners. [Pg.212]

Unertl, W.N., Implications of contact mechanics models for mechanical properties measurements using scanning force microscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Films, 17(4), 1779-1786(1999). [Pg.218]

Step 2. After a contact time t, the material is fractured or fatigued and the mechanical properties determined. The measured properties will be a function of the test configuration, rate of testing, temperature, etc., and include the critical strain energy release rate Gic, the critical stress intensity factor K[c, the critical... [Pg.354]

The dry adhesive films on the two substrates to be joined must be placed in contact to develop adequate autoadhesion, i.e. diffusion of polymer rubber chains must be achieved across the interface between the two films to produce intimate adhesion at molecular level. The application of pressure and/or temperature for a given time allows the desired level of intimate contact (coalescence) between the two adhesive film surfaces. Obviously, the rheological and mechanical properties of the rubber adhesives will determine the degree of intimacy at the interface. These properties can be optimized by selecting the adequate rubber grade, the nature and amount of tackifier and the amount of filler, among other factors. [Pg.575]

Oridation. This is caused by contact with oxidising acids, exposure to u-v, prolonged application of excessive heat, or exposure to weathering. It results in a deterioration of mechanical properties (embrittlement and possibly stress cracking), increase in power factor, and loss of clarity. It affects most thermoplastics to varying degrees, in particular polyolefins, PVC, nylons, and cellulose derivatives. [Pg.27]

Instruments based on the contact principle can further be divided into two classes mechanical thermometers and electrical thermometers. Mechanical thermometers are based on the thermal expansion of a gas, a liquid, or a solid material. They are simple, robust, and do not normally require power to operate. Electrical resistance thermometers utilize the connection between the electrical resistance and the sensor temperature. Thermocouples are based on the phenomenon, where a temperature-dependent voltage is created in a circuit of two different metals. Semiconductor thermometers have a diode or transistor probe, or a more advanced integrated circuit, where the voltage of the semiconductor junctions is temperature dependent. All electrical meters are easy to incorporate with modern data acquisition systems. A summary of contact thermometer properties is shown in Table 12.3. [Pg.1136]

Both the dipolymers and terpolymers have excellent resistance to hydrocarbons found m petroleum-based fuels and lubricants The 69 5% F terpolymer resists swellmg m blended fuels that contain metlianol and can be used in contact with certain phosphate ester-based hydraulic fluids Terpolymers are preferred for contact with aromatic solvents, although either type performs well in higher alcohols VDF-based elastomers dissolve m polar aprotic solvents such as ketones, esters, amides, and certam ethers These elastomers are therefore not suitable for contact with fluids that contain substantial amounts of these solvents because of excessive swell and consequent loss of mechanical properties... [Pg.1113]

Column diameter for a particular service is a function of the physical properties of the vapor and liquid at the tray conditions, efficiency and capacity characteristics of the contacting mechanism (bubble trays, sieve trays, etc.) as represented by velocity effects including entrainment, and the pressure of the operation. Unfortunately the interrelationship of these is not clearly understood. Therefore, diameters are determined by relations correlated by empirical factors. The factors influencing bubble cap and similar devices, sieve tray and perforated plate columns are somewhat different. [Pg.126]


See other pages where Contact mechanical properties is mentioned: [Pg.417]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.1701]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.1017]    [Pg.1215]    [Pg.821]    [Pg.907]   


SEARCH



Contact mechanics

Contact stiffness mechanical properties

Further Properties of the Successive Contact Mechanism

Mechanical contact

© 2024 chempedia.info