Contact angles types

Test Methods. Surface tension (y) measurements were taken by Wil-helmy method (25+0.1°C). Critical micelle concentrations (cmc) were obtained from Y logC curves. Contact angle. Type GI, Japan. Wetting test. Canvas disk method, CIS,HG-2-380-66. Foam test, Ross-Miles lather method. Emulslbillty was determined by mixing 20 ml of 2.5%... 

The technique consists in measuring the B (e.g. water) flow rate (/) through a membrane impregnated with A (e.g. isobutanol or mixtures of alcohols and water) as a function of the pressure difference AP. We have to note that it is possible to modify the method from "pressure controlled" to "flow controlled" in order to reduce the test time and increase its flexibility [126]. At a certain minimum pressure the largest pores become permeable, while the smaller pores still remain impermeable. This minimum pressure depends mainly on the type of membrane material (contact angle), type of permeate (surface tension) and pore size. When all pores are filled with B, the liquid flux / through the membrane becomes directly proportional to the pressure. 

In the context of the structural perturbations at fluid-solid interfaces, it is interesting to investigate the viscosity of thin liquid films. Eaily work on thin-film viscosity by Deijaguin and co-workers used a blow off technique to cause a liquid film to thin. This work showed elevated viscosities for some materials [98] and thin film viscosities lower than the bulk for others [99, 100]. Some controversial issues were raised particularly regarding surface roughness and contact angles in the experiments [101-103]. Entirely different types of data on clays caused Low [104] to conclude that the viscosity of interlayer water in clays is greater than that of bulk water. 

It is clear from our discussion of contact angle hysteresis that there is some degree of variability in reported contact angle values. The data collected in Table X-2, therefore, are intended mainly as a guide to the type of behavior to be expected. The older data comprise mainly results for refractory and relatively polar solids, while newer data are for polymeric surfaces. 

For some types of wetting more than just the contact angle is involved in the basic mechanism of the action. This is true in the laying of dust and the wetting of a fabric since in these situations the liquid is required to penetrate between dust particles or between the fibers of the fabric. TTie phenomenon is related to that of capillary rise, where the driving force is the pressure difference across the curved surface of the meniscus. The relevant equation is then Eq. X-36,... 

It was pointed out in Section XIII-4A that if the contact angle between a solid particle and two liquid phases is finite, a stable position for the particle is at the liquid-liquid interface. Coalescence is inhibited because it takes work to displace the particle from the interface. In addition, one can account for the type of emulsion that is formed, 0/W or W/O, simply in terms of the contact angle value. As illustrated in Fig. XIV-7, the bulk of the particle will lie in that liquid that most nearly wets it, and by what seems to be a correct application of the early oriented wedge" principle (see Ref. 48), this liquid should then constitute the outer phase. Furthermore, the action of surfactants should be predictable in terms of their effect on the contact angle. This was, indeed, found to be the case in a study by Schulman and Leja [49] on the stabilization of emulsions by barium sulfate. 

Most LB-forming amphiphiles have hydrophobic tails, leaving a very hydrophobic surface. In order to introduce polarity to the final surface, one needs to incorporate bipolar components that would not normally form LB films on their own. Berg and co-workers have partly surmounted this problem with two- and three-component mixtures of fatty acids, amines, and bipolar alcohols [175, 176]. Interestingly, the type of deposition depends on the contact angle of the substrate, and, thus, when relatively polar monolayers are formed, they are deposited as Z-type multilayers. Phase-separated LB films of hydrocarbon-fluorocarbon mixtures provide selective adsorption sites for macromolecules, due to the formation of a step site at the domain boundary [177]. 

From what you know about wetting, contact angles, and spread monolayers, explain why a Langmuir-Blodgett layer will deposit as a F type if there are nonpolar fatty acids, yet will switch to a Z-type deposition if bipolar alcohols or amines are added (see Refs. 175, 176). What defines the critical contact angle for the deposition change ... 

This description is traditional, and some further comment is in order. The flat region of the type I isotherm has never been observed up to pressures approaching this type typically is observed in chemisorption, at pressures far below P. Types II and III approach the line asymptotically experimentally, such behavior is observed for adsorption on powdered samples, and the approach toward infinite film thickness is actually due to interparticle condensation [36] (see Section X-6B), although such behavior is expected even for adsorption on a flat surface if bulk liquid adsorbate wets the adsorbent. Types FV and V specifically refer to porous solids. There is a need to recognize at least the two additional isotherm types shown in Fig. XVII-8. These are two simple types possible for adsorption on a flat surface for the case where bulk liquid adsorbate rests on the adsorbent with a finite contact angle [37, 38]. 

Increase adhesion tension. Maximize surface tension. Minimize contact angle. Alter surfactant concentration or type to maximize adhesion tension and minimize Marangoni effects. Precoat powder with wettahle monolayers, e.g., coatings or steam. Control impurity levels in particle formation. Alter crystal hahit in particle formation. Minimize surface roughness in milhng. 

Section 4.1 briefly describes some of the commonly employed experimental tools and procedures. Chaudhury et al., Israelachvili et al. and Tirrell et al. employed contact mechanics based approach to estimate surface energies of different self-assembled monolayers and polymers. In these studies, the results of these measurements were compared to the results of contact angle measurements. These measurements are reviewed in Section 4.2. The JKR type measurements are discussed in Section 4.2.1, and the measurements done using the surface forces apparatus (SFA) are reviewed in Section 4.2.2. 

Measurement of the contact angle at a solid-liquid interface is a widely used method for the determination of the surface energy of solid polymers. Fowkes [1] first proposed that the surface energy of a pure phase, y y could be represented by the sum of the contribution from different types of force components, especially the dispersion and the polar components, such that ... 

Such polymers are as hydrophobic as poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (Teflon), with water contact angles in the range of 107°. But, unlike Teflon, polyphosphazenes of this type are easy to fabricate, are flexible or elastomeric, and can be used as coatings for other materials. ... 

The majority of commercial LB troughs use the Wilhehny plate method for measurement of surface pressure (II), although some use the alternate Langmuir float method. The plate material most commonly used is cut pieces of filter paper, of negligible cost and completely wetted by water. The other type of plate used is a piece of high-purity platinum metal, which can be cleaned in a flame and gives a reproducible contact angle with water of 60°. 

Ideally one would like to visualize the molecular-scale details at the edge of a droplet to obtain direct information about the molecular nature of wetting. This is not always possible, particularly when these details have dimensions below 300 A, the resolution limit of SPFM. However, the height and curvature of a droplet can usually be measured accurately. These parameters can then be used to obtain an effective contact angle, as defined in Eq. (10). We present here a few examples of this type of study. 

Among solids, teflon exhibits the largest hydrophobicity (9 = 108°). Solids of teflon type, with their high contact angles, are called naturally hydrophobic and float without the assistance of chemical reagents. Artificial hydrophobicity to which the collector contributes is really not required to float solids or minerals characterized by natural hydrophobicity. 

The computer interface system lends itself well to the determination of interfacial tension and contact angles using Equation 3 and the technique described by Pike and Thakkar for Wilhelmy plate type experiments (20). Contact angles for crude oil/brine systems using the dynamic Wilhelmy plate technique have been determined by this technique and all three of the wetting cycles described above have been observed in various crude oil/brine systems (21) (Teeters, D. Wilson, J. F. Andersen, M. A. Thomas, D. C. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1988, 126, in press). The dynamic Wilhelmy plate device also addresses other aspects of wetting behavior pertinent to petroleum reservoirs. 

Wentworth process, for ethanol separation from water, 8 834-835 Wenzel s equation, 22 111-112 Wenzel contact angle, 22 111 Werner nomenclature scheme, 17 391-392 Werner-Pfleiderer (WP) Compounder, 22 44 Werner-type inclusion compounds, 14 171-172... 

If the fibres in the paper have been rendered hydrophobic by sizing, but the sheet has an open structure and there has been no surface treatment to cover the sized fibres, then the web will show a high contact angle. However, if the same web is tested by a penetration-type test, the sizing level will be low. 

A Hitachi EPI-S2 infrared spectrometer, a contact angle meter (Kyowa Kagaku Co. Type CA-P) and an ESCA spectrometer(Kokusai Den-ki Co.) were used for relevant measurements. 

---