Concentration linearity quantification

In Raman spectroscopy the intensity of scattered radiation depends not only on the polarizability and concentration of the analyte molecules, but also on the optical properties of the sample and the adjustment of the instrument. Absolute Raman intensities are not, therefore, inherently a very accurate measure of concentration. These intensities are, of course, useful for quantification under well-defined experimental conditions and for well characterized samples otherwise relative intensities should be used instead. Raman bands of the major component, the solvent, or another component of known concentration can be used as internal standards. For isotropic phases, intensity ratios of Raman bands of the analyte and the reference compound depend linearly on the concentration ratio over a wide concentration range and are, therefore, very well-suited for quantification. Changes of temperature and the refractive index of the sample can, however, influence Raman intensities, and the band positions can be shifted by different solvation at higher concentrations or... 

To quantify the concentration of a colorant, one must consider that linearity between the colorant concentration and the fluorescence emission intensity exists only at very low concentrations. The reason for deviation from linearity may be reabsorption of the emission light by other fluorophores or formation of dimers. If no extraction and controlled dilution of the fluorescent colorant are performed, the colorant quantification will be only qualitative. 

The accuracy and precision of carotenoid quantification by HPLC depend on the standard purity and measurement of the peak areas thus quantification of overlapping peaks can cause high variation of peak areas. In addition, preparation and dilution of standard and sample solutions are among the main causes of error in quantitative analysis. For example, the absorbance levels at of lutein in concentrations up to 10 mM have a linear relationship between concentration and absorbance in hexane and MeOH on the other hand, the absorbance of P-carotene in hexane increased linearly with increasing concentration, whereas in MeOH, its absorbance increased linearly up to 5 mM but non-linearly at increasingly higher concentrations. In other words, when a stock solution of carotenoids is prepared, care should be taken to ensure that the compounds are fuUy soluble at the desired concentrations in a particular solvent. 

Famoxadone, IN-JS940, and IN-KZ007 residues are measured in soil (p-g kg ), sediment (p-gkg ), and water (pgL ). Quantification is based on analyte response in calibration standards and sample extract analyses determined as pg mL Calibration standard runs are analyzed before and after every 1 samples in each analytical set. Analyte quantification is based on (1) linear regression analysis of (y-axis) analyte concentration (lagmL Q and (x-axis) analyte peak area response or (2) the average response factor determined from the appropriate calibration standards. The SLOPE and INTERCEPT functions of Microsoft Excel are used to determine slope and intercept. The AVERAGE and STDEV functions of Microsoft Excel are used to determine average response factors and standard deviations. 

Also, if conversion of drug to active metabolite shows significant departure from linear pharmacokinetics, it is possible that small differences in the rate of absorption of the parent drug (even within the 80-125% range for log transformed data) could result in clinically significant differences in the concentration/ time profiles for the active metabolite. When reliable data indicate that this situation may exist, a requirement of quantification of active metabolites in a bioequivalency study would seem to be fully justified. 

Figure 16.4. Quantification of A9-tetrahydrocannabinol (9THC) after TFA and 11-nor-9-carboxy-A9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) after PFP in blood using GC-MS/NCI. Drug-free blood was spiked with 9THC (a) and THCCOOH (b) to the concentrations of 0, 5, 10, and 50 or 20ng/mL and with ISs-9THC-D3 and THCCOOH-D3 to 20ng/mL. Monitoring ions were (m/z) 410.3 for 9THC and 572.3 for THCCOOH. The values of validation parameters, expressed in ng/mL, were LOD, 0.25 LOQ, 0.5 limit of linearity, 0.5 to 100 for both analytes [2].

The range of the CE-SDS method depends on each individual protein molecule. Generally the method is linear from 0.5 to 2.0 mg/mL for both UV/PDA and laser-induced fluorescent (LIE) methods.Although protein concentrations as high as 3.0 mg/mL can be used for protein quantification, considering the SDS to protein ratio required, high protein concentrations are not recommended. LOD/LOQ values are different for UV/PDA versus LIE detection. For LIE detection with 5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine succinimidyl... 

The authors determined specificity using the known hydrolytic degradation products. The precision of spiked samples of these degradation products were determined and found to be acceptable (99.9 0.4%). Accuracy of the method was determined using spiked recoveries of piroxicam benzoate, and the recoveries were acceptable (99.1-100.5%). Assay precision n = 6, RSD = 0.4%) was in accord with recommended criteria [7]. Within-day precision was performed on two instruments on two separate days, and the overall intermediate precision was 1.0%. The method was linear over the expected analyte concentration range giving a regression line of 1 = 0.999. The detection (DL) and quantification levels (QL) were assessed, and the latter was determined as 0.185 pg/ml (ca. 0.04%). 

BAs are extracted with a Ci8 reversed-phase column, identified and quantified by simultaneous monitoring of their parent and daughter ions, using the MRM mode. Identification and quantification of conjugated BAs in bile is achieved in 5 min. The detection limit is 1 ng, and the response is linear for concentrations up to 100 ng. 

Fig. 8.12 shows the setup of a laser beam and microphone for ethylene quantification with a PAS detector [24]. In the array, the eight reaction tubes are arranged linearly. A pulsed laser is passed through each effluent from the reactors to excite ethylene molecules. The pulsed laser used emitted at 943-950 cm-1 (where ethylene has a strong absorption) - a 10 or 100 Hz modulated 25 W laser with a pulse length of 35 or 25 ps. A microphone with a fast response time and decay was used. The ethylene concentration of each effluent was determined by the volume and response time. The signal from the most distant tube is weak so that the signals were accumulated for 2.5 s. Data presented in the reference are shown in Fig. 8.13. Ethylene concentrations were determined for the effluent from the mixed-oxide catalyst consisting of La, Ba, Pb, Th, Mn, Ni and Cu.

A selective, sensitive, and rapid hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry was developed for the determination of donepezil in human plasma [32], Donepezil was twice extracted from human plasma using methyl-ferf-butyl ether at basic pH. The analytes were separated on an Atlantis HILIC Silica column with the mobile phase of acetonitrile ammonium formate (50 mM, pH 4.0) (85 15, v/v) and detected by tandem mass spectrometry in the selective reaction monitoring mode. The calibration curve was linear (r = 0.9994) over the concentration range of 0.10-50.0 ng/ ml and the lower limit of quantification was 0.1 ng/ml using 200 /d plasma sample. The CV and relative error for intra- and inter-assay at four quality control levels were 2.7% to 10.5% and —10.0% to 0.0%, respectively. There was no matrix effect for donepezil and cisapride. The present method was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of donepezil after oral dose of donepezil hydrochloride (10 mg tablet) to male healthy volunteers. 

A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method was developed [33] and validated for the determination of donepezil in human plasma samples. Diphenhydramine was used as the IS. The collision-induced transition m/z 380 > 91 was used to analyze donepezil in selected reaction monitoring mode. The signal intensity of the m/z 380 —> 91 transition was found to relate linearly with donepezil concentrations in plasma from 0.1 to 20.0 ng/ml. The lower limit of quantification of the LC/MS/MS method was 0.1 ng/ml. The intra- and inter-day precisions were below 10.2% and the accuracy was between 2.3% and +2.8%. The validated LC/MS/MS method was applied to a pharmacokinetic study in which healthy Chinese volunteers each received a single oral dose of 5 mg donepezil hydrochloride. The non-compartmental pharmacokinetic model was used to fit the donepezil plasma concentration-time curve. Maximum plasma concentration was... 

Zarghi et al. [76] developed an HPLC method, using a monolithic column, for quantification of omeprazole in plasma. The method is specific and sensitive with a quantification limit of 10 ng/ml. Sample preparation involves simple, one-step extraction procedure, and analytical recovery was complete. The separation was carried out in reversed-phase conditions using a Chromolith Performance (RP-18e, 100 x 4.6 mm) column with an isocratic mobile phase consisting of 0.01 mol/1 disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer-acetonitrile (73 27) adjusted to pH 7.1. The wavelength was set at 302 nm. The calibration curve was linear over the concentration range 20-1500 ng/ml. The coefficients of variation for intra- and interday assay were found to be less than 7%. 

Sultana et al. [88] developed a reversed-phase HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of omeprazole in Risek capsules. Omeprazole and the internal standard, diazepam, were separated by Shim-pack CLC-ODS (0.4 x 25 cm, 5 m) column. The mobile phase was methanol-water (80 20), pumped isocratically at ambient temperature. Analysis was run at a flow-rate of 1 ml/min at a detection wavelength of 302 nm. The method was specific and sensitive with a detection limit of 3.5 ng/ml at a signal-to-noise ratio of 4 1. The limit of quantification was set at 6.25 ng/ml. The calibration curve was linear over a concentration range of 6.25—1280 ng/ml. Precision and accuracy, demonstrated by within-day, between-day assay, and interoperator assays were lower than 10%. 

---