Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calculating test material requirements

Each person should find the remaining parameters and physical property data for this material required to solve the three models [Eqs. (8.14), (8.19), and (8.20)] for the erosive wear of a coal slurry that is, each person will have three calculations to do and three erosion rates as a result. Assume that the test temperamre is 343°C, the slurry velocity is 100 m/s, and the angle of attack is 50°. [Pg.831]

Finding a correlation between Young s modulus and material hardness required the use of hardness standards on the Mohs scale (quartz, topaz, corundum) whose hardness calculated using various methods was shown in Table 9.3. These data helped us to define the relation between Young s modulus and hardness of standard materials (Fig. 9.12), and then to read the degree of hardness of various tested materials from a chart (Table 9.4, Fig. 9.13). [Pg.305]

The test chemical is typically administered directly into the stomach by gavage, which is a requirement of EPA and some other regulatory agencies. This method of dosing allows a precise calculation of the amount of test material received by the animal. Studies typically have three dose levels and a control group that receives the vehicle used for test material delivery. The high dose level is chosen to be one at which some maternal toxicity is known to occur, but never one that would cause more than 10% mortality. The low dose should be one at which no maternal toxicity is apparent, and the intermediate dose(s) should be chosen as a predicted low effect level. [Pg.375]

Sometimes when comparing two methods in analytical chemistry we are unable to obtain true replicates of each specimen or aliquot, due to limited availability of the test material or the requirements of the analytical method. In these cases, each test object or specimen has to be treated independently for the two methods, i.e., it is not possible to calculate a mean and standard deviation for the samples as each... [Pg.26]

The resonant beam test technique forms the basis of the ASTM Standard E756-83 for measuring the viscoelastic properties of damping materials. Fundamentally, the beam test requires that the resonant frequencies of a metal-beam, mounted in cantilever fashion, be determined as a function of temperature and frequency the beam is then coated with a polymer and the resonant frequencies and corresponding modal damping of the composite beam are determined as a function of temperature and frequency. From these two data sets, the vibration damping properties of the polymer can be evaluated. The ASTM Standard provides the necessary equations to obtain the complex modulus data from the collected test data and also provides guidelines for the proper choice of the specimens (1.21. The principal difference between the beam test and the other methods used here is that the beam test calculates the material properties from the test results on the metal beam and the composite beam whereas the... [Pg.133]

The average concentration of phosphorus was found to be 3000 ppm. Given the calculated yearly material deposition rate, approximately 11 kg phosphorus would have been contributed each year. Cook and Heizer arrived at an annual deposition rate of 124 kg phosphorus to a site area by a standard population of 100 individuals (28). By utilizing this rate, a population of only nine individuals would have been required to account for the amounts of phosphorus found to be present. Because phosphorus as phosphate is the least mobile of the elements tested, this figure can be considered to represent an absolute minimum permanent population estimate for the site during the period of occupation under consideration. It should be remembered, however, that soil phosphate is also found in occluded forms and in organic combination and that these fractions were not totally measured by the procedure utilized (29). Consequently, the minimum population estimate should be increased, perhaps by as much as 50-60%, to about 15 individuals. [Pg.74]

The remarkable situation in which we find ourselves in modem materials science is that physics has for some time been sufficiently developed, in terms of fundamental quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics, that complete and exact ab initio calculations of materials properties can, in principle, be performed for any property and any material. The term ab initio" in this context means without any adjustable or phenomenological or calibration parameters being required or provided. One simply puts the required nuclei and electrons in a box and one applies theory to obtain the outcome of a specified measurement. The recipe for doing this is known but the execution can be tedious to the point of being impossible. The name of the game, therefore, has been to devise approximations and methods that make the actual calculations doable with limited computer resources. Thanks to increased computer power, the various approximations can be tested and surpassed and more and more complex materials can be modelled. This section provides a brief overview of the theoretical methods of solid state magnetism and of nanomaterial magnetism in particular. [Pg.252]

In a recent series of impact tests the plastic deformation rates required to initiate chemical reaction were measured at the reaction site for 10 different explosive materials ranging from the sensitive explosives RDX and HMX to the insensitive explosives PBXN-128 and PBX 9502 [21]. The measured plastic deformation rate ranged from Ay/At =. 7 x lO" s for RDX or HMX to Ay/At > 3 x 10 s PBXN-128 to PBX-9502. Substituting these measured plastic deformation rates into the expression for the calculated plastic deformation rate in the previous paragraph implies that first reaction occurs in the impact tested materials when 10 < T(x,U)pc < 10 . As shown above, T(r, U)pc = 10 predicts the observed plastic strain in RDX crystals just prior to the initiation threshold. [Pg.113]

The concepmal model for As toxicokinetics requires further clarification. Salient features of the model include the following (1) absorbed As is primarily excreted in the urine. Thus, the UEF, defined as the amount of As excreted in urine divided by the dosed amount, can be used to estimate the ABA. (2) Absolute bioavailability (ABA = AF ) of As from a test material can be estimated from the ratio of UEF of As from test material compared with intravenously dosed As. (3) The RBAs of two orally dosed materials (e.g., a test soil and sodium arsenate) can be calculated from the ratio of their UEFs. This calculation is independent of the extent of tissue binding and biliary excretion ... [Pg.123]

Product design starts by one visualizing a certain material, makes approximate calculations to see if the contemplated idea is practical to meet requirements that includes cost, and, if the answer is favorable, proceeds to collect detailed data on a range of materials that may be considered for the new product. The application of appropriate data to product design can mean the difference between the success and failure of manufactured products made from any material. The available plastic test data requires an understanding and proper interpretation before an attempt can be made to apply them to the product design. Details on designing a product can follow a flow pattern as shown in Table 7.6. [Pg.626]

For any material requiring impact testing, where the maximum calculated fiber elongation after... [Pg.421]

For paint purposes, to identify a powder (pigments) sample is desired, its diffraction pattern is compared with diagrams of known substances until a match is obtained. This method requires a library of standard films to be available. Alternatively, d values calculated from the diffraction diagram of the unknown substance are compared with the d values of over 5000 entries listed on plain cards, Keysort cards, and IBM cards in the X-ray powder data file (Switzer et al, 1948). An index volume is available with the file. The cataloging scheme (American Society of Testing Materials, 1989) used to classify different cards lists the three most intense refleetions in the upper left comer of each card. The cards are then arranged in sequenee of decreasing d values of the most intense reflections, based on 100 for the most intense reflection observed. [Pg.134]

Alkalinity and Lime Content. The whole mud alkalinity test procedure is a titration method which measures the volume of standard acid required to react with the alkaline (basic) materials in an oil mud sample. The alkalinity value is used to calculate the pounds per barrel unreacted excess lime in an oil mud. Excess alkaline materials, such as lime, help to stabilize the emulsion and also neutralize carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide acidic gases. [Pg.662]

The Knoop test is a microhardness test. In microhardness testing the indentation dimensions are comparable to microstructural ones. Thus, this testing method becomes useful for assessing the relative hardnesses of various phases or microconstituents in two phase or multiphase alloys. It can also be used to monitor hardness gradients that may exist in a solid, e.g., in a surface hardened part. The Knoop test employs a skewed diamond indentor shaped so that the long and short diagonals of the indentation are approximately in the ratio 7 1. The Knoop hardness number (KHN) is calculated as the force divided by the projected indentation area. The test uses low loads to provide small indentations required for microhardness studies. Since the indentations are very small their dimensions have to be measured under an optical microscope. This implies that the surface of the material is prepared approximately. For those reasons, microhardness assessments are not as often used industrially as are other hardness tests. However, the use of microhardness testing is undisputed in research and development situations. [Pg.29]

The national pressure vessel codes and standards require that all pressure vessels be subjected to a pressure test to prove the integrity of the finished vessel. A hydraulic test is normally carried out, but a pneumatic test can be substituted under circumstances where the use of a liquid for testing is not practical. Hydraulic tests are safer because only a small amount of energy is stored in the compressed liquid. A standard pressure test is used when the required thickness of the vessel parts can be calculated in accordance with the particular code or standard. The vessel is tested at a pressure above the design pressure, typically 25 to 30 per cent. The test pressure is adjusted to allow for the difference in strength of the vessel material at the test temperature compared with the design temperature, and for any corrosion allowance. [Pg.872]

There are two main caveats to Equation 9.4 firstly, that this formula gives SM in units of joule per kilogram per kelvin, meaning no account is taken of the volume of the material under test. For this, the density is required and these two parameters combine (-p ASM) to give a better characterization, with units of millijoule per cubic centimetre per kelvin, acknowledging the composition of the material in bulk. Densities can readily be calculated from X-ray crystallographic data so that this presents no extra hardship. Secondly, one should be aware that the highest possible spin is not always attained, and, particularly in 3d systems, it may be impossible to saturate the spin system in moderate fields [15]. [Pg.297]

The analytical variance can be determined by carrying out replicate analysis of samples that are known to be homogeneous. You can then determine the total variance. To do this, take a minimum of seven laboratory samples and analyse each of them (note that Sample characterizes the uncertainty associated with producing the laboratory sample, whereas sanalysis w h take into account any sample treatment required in the laboratory to obtain the test sample). Calculate the variance of the results obtained. This represents stQtal as it includes the variation in results due to the analytical process, plus any additional variation due to the sampling procedures used to produce the laboratory samples and the distribution of the analyte in the bulk material. [Pg.36]


See other pages where Calculating test material requirements is mentioned: [Pg.32]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.1092]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.1018]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.227]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.484 ]




SEARCH



MATERIALS TESTE

Material requirements

Materials testing

Required Testing

Required calculation

Test calculations

Test material

Test requirements

Testing requirements

© 2024 chempedia.info