Analytical validation purpose

Traditionally, HPLC, GC-MS, or LC-MS methods were used to monitor the clearance of small-molecule impurities. These analytical techniques often require unique solvents, columns, methods, reagents, detectors, and buffers for each analyte to be quantified. The NMR method, albeit not the most sensitive technique, normally does not have these problems. In this chapter, some examples will be used to demonstrate that NMR is a fast, generic, and reliable analytical technique for solving analytical problems encountered in the development of biopharmaceutical products. The NMR techniques described here require minimal sample handling and use simple standard NMR methods. They can easily be implemented and used for process development and validation purposes. 

The following principles should be used to establish a valid analytical method A specific detailed description and protocol should be written (standard operating procedure (SOP)). Each step in the method should be investigated to determine the extent to which environmental, matrix, material, or procedural variables, from time of collection of material until the time of analysis and including the time of analysis, may affect the estimation of analy te in the matrix. A method should be validated for its intended use with an acceptable protocol. Wherever possible, tire same matrix should be used for validation purposes. The concentration range over which the analyte will be determined must be defined in the method, on the basis of actual standard samples over the range (standard curve). It is necessary to use a sufficient number of standards to adequately define the relationship between concentration and response. Determination of accuracy and precision should he made by analysis of replicate sets of analyte samples of known concentration from equivalent matrix. 

For the validation purpose, the data from Ref. [100] are used. In this study, absorption experiments were carried out using a baffled vessel operated batch-wise with respect to liquid, and the experimental results were compared with an approximate analytical solution based on the Leveque model. The authors proposed a two-reaction-plane model and achieved a good agreement between theoretical and experimental absorption rates (see Section 9.5.4.5). 

The most rugged instruments available, filter-based devices are capable of performing rather sophisticated analyses. With a filter wheel providing several dozen wavelengths of observation, multiple-analyte analyses are quite common. These multiple assays are more amenable to agricultural or food products than pharmaceuticals, if only for validation purposes. Fine chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and gasses may be likely to have sharper peaks and are better analyzed via a continuous monochromator (i.e., grating, FT, AOTF). 

We have developed a protocol which describes how data generated from experimental studies commonly undertaken for method validation purposes can be used in measurement uncertainty evaluation. This paper has illustrated the application of the protocol. In the example described, the uncertainty estimate for three analytes in different oil matrices was evaluated from three experimental studies, namely precision, recovery and ruggedness. These studies were required as part of the method validation, but planning the studies with uncertainty evaluation in mind allowed an uncertainty estimate to be calculated with little extra effort. A number of areas were identified where additional experimental work may be required to refine the estimates. However the necessary data could be generated by carrying out additional analyses alongside routine test samples. Again this would minimise the amount of laboratory effort required. 

A registration application should include documented evidence that the analytical procedures are validated and suitable for the detection and quantification of impurities (see ICH Q2A and Q2B on Analytical Validation). Technical factors (e.g., manufacturing capability and control methodology) can be considered as part of the justification for selection of alternative thresholds based on manufacturing experience with the proposed commercial process. The use of two decimal places for thresholds does not necessarily reflect the precision of the analytical procedure used for routine quality control purposes. Thus, the use of lower precision techniques (e.g., thin-layer chromatography) can be appropriate where justified and appropriately validated. Differences in the analytical procedures used during development and those proposed for the commercial product should be discussed... 

The ultimate goal of an assay or an analytical procedure is to measure accurately a quantity or a concentration of an analyte, or to measure a specific activity, as in some assays for biomarkers. However, many activity assays, such as cell-based and enzyme activity assays, may not be very sensitive, may lack precision, and/or do not include the use of definitive reference standards. Assays based on measurements of physicochemical (such as chromatographic methods) or biochemical (such as ligand-binding assays) attributes of the analyte assume that these quantifiable characteristics are reflective of the quantities, concentration, or biological activity of the analyte. For the purpose of bioanalytical method validation, we will follow the recently proposed classifications for assay data by Lee et al. [4,5]. These classifications, as summarized below, provide a clear distinction with respect to analytical validation practices and requirements. 

The principal purpose of analytical validation is to ensure that a selected analytical procedure will give reproducible and reliable results that are adequate for the intended purpose. It is thus necessary to define properly both the conditions in which the procedure is to be used and the purpose for which it is intended. These principles apply to all procedures described in a pharmacopoeia and to non-pharmacopoeial procedures used in a manufacturing company. 

Careful understauding of the effects of each preanalytical variable on the biomarker data is complex and necessitates a staged approach conceptually similar to the fit-for-purpose analytical validation of a biomarker assay (see Chapter 41). In the early exploratory phase of biomarker investigation, standardization of procedures with a defined protocol for sample collection and handling will permit comparative interpretation and analysis of the data within study and/or between studies. Minimally, variables that should be experimentally evaluated to optimize sample collection for a specific biomarker will include matrix type, preservation... 

Long term storage stability of analytical samples can be a major issue in several applications, e.g. analysis of pesticide residues in environmental samples and bioanalytical samples. For some validation purposes (e.g. bioanalytical... 

The analysis includes three mathematically distinct cases addressing all possible interfacial adhesive stress scenarios (1) fully elastic adhesive throughout the bondline, (2) adhesive plastically strained at only one bondline end, and (3) adhesive exhibiting plastic strains at both ends of the joint. For comparison and validation purposes with the second analytical model and the experimental example provided later, only the first scenario is reviewed herein. Bond configuration and notations adopted are shown in Fig. 10.11. It should be noted that the origin of the x-coordinate is the middle of the joint only for the current mathematical lap-shear stress expressions. However, for other contexts in this chapter, the origin is located at the left end of the lap joint (i.e. near the gap of Fig. 10.10). 

Modern analysis begins with a definition and outline of the problem and ends only after a detailed critical evaluation of the relevant analytical data is complete, permitting the presentation of a result ( Analytical Chemistry, Purpose and Procedures). The analyst must therefore retain the ability to monitor a sample conscientiously and knowledgably throughout the analytical process. Only the analyst is in a position to assess the quality of a set of results and the validity of subsequent conclusions, although defining the problem and presenting the conclusions is almost always a cooperative multidisciplinary effort. 

The guideline states that the objective of validation is to demonstrate that an analytical method is fit for its purpose and summarizes the characteristics required of tests for identification, control of impurities and assay procedures (Table 13-2). As such, it applies to chiral drug substances as to any other active ingredients. Requirements for other analytical procedures may be added in due course. 

The purpose of analysis is to determine the quality or composition of a material and for the analytical results obtained to have any validity or meaning it is essential that adequate sampling procedures be adopted. Sampling is the process of extracting from a large quantity of material a small portion which is truly representative of the composition of the whole material. 

LGC - VAM Publications (i) The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods, A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics, (2) Practical Statistics for the Analytical Scientist A Bench Guide By TJ Farrant, (3) Trace Analysis A structured Approach to Obtaining Reliable Results By E Pritchard, (4) Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, and (5) Quality in the Analytical Chemistry Laboratory. LGC/RSC Publications, London, England. 

For regulatory purposes, food-based RMs play an important role in validating accuracy of analytical data from use of routine methodology. For example, the quality of data obtained by analytical measurements serves an important function with regard to ensuring nutritional label claims. Unfortunately, and historically in some cases, assay data for the same analyte can vary greatly from laboratory to laboratory. Evalua-... 

The purpose of this article is to clarify the assessment of residue analytical methods in the context of Directive 91/414/EEC. After discussing the legal and historical background, requirements for enforcement methods as well as data generation methods are reviewed. Finally, an outlook over further developments in the assessment and validation of analytical methods is provided. 

Validation may mean different things to different people, depending on the context and the application of analytical science. For food control and monitoring purposes, it is generally expected that validation includes the establishment of performance characteristics and evidence that the method fits the respective purpose. ... 

The majority of validation data required for analytical methods supporting authorization purposes are common to those described for enforcement methods (see Section 4). However, some of the requirements such as minimum cost and commonly available equipment do not apply to methods supporting pre-registration studies (e.g., the use of GC/MS/MS technology). 

J.D. MacNeU, J. Patterson, and V. Martz, Validation of analytical methods - proving your method is fit for purpose, in Principles and Practices of Method Vahdation, ed. A. Flajgelj and A. Ambrus, MPG Books, Bodmin, pp. 100-107 (2000). 

Validation of analytical methods for post-registration control and monitoring purposes in the European Union... 

In this article, an analytical method is defined as series of procedures from receipt of a sample to final determination of the residue. Validation is the process of verifying that a method is fit for purpose. Typically, validation follows completion of the development of a method. Validated analytical data are essential for monitoring of pesticide residues and control of legal residue limits. Analysts must provide information to demonstrate that a method intended for these purposes is capable of providing adequate specificity, accuracy and precision, at relevant analyte concentrations and in all matrices analyzed. 

---