Validation of the analytical data

It may be possible to demonstrate a high degree of precision in a set of replicate analyses done at the same time and in such a situation the within batch imprecision would be said to be good. However, comparison of replicate samples analysed on different days or in different batches may show greater variation and the between batch imprecision would be said to be poor. In practice this may more closely reflect the validity of the analytical data than would the within batch imprecision. 

Although the validity of the analytical data is uncertain, a generally accepted fouling classification of coal, according to total chlorine content (ASTM D-2361 ISO 352 ISO 587), is as follows ... 

The VG was established in 1997 and is responsible for the technical validity of the analytical data in... 

Evaluation and validation of data Evaluation and validation of the analytical data is only possible if the species are determined quantitatively. The calculation of... 

When the analytical laboratory is not responsible for sampling, the quality management system often does not even take these weak links in the analytical process into account. Furthermore, if sample preparation (extraction, cleanup, etc.) has not been carried out carefully, even the most advanced, quality-controlled analytical instruments and sophisticated computer techniques cannot prevent the results of the analysis from being called into question. Finally, unless the interpretation and evaluation of results are underpinned by solid statistical data, the significance of these results is unclear, which in turn greatly undermines their merit. We therefore believe that quality control and quality assurance should involve all the steps of chemical analysis as an integral process, of which the validation of the analytical methods is merely one step, albeit an important one. In laboratory practice, quality criteria should address the rationality of the sampling plan, validation of methods, instruments and laboratory procedures, the reliability of identifications, the accuracy and precision of measured concentrations, and the comparability of laboratory results with relevant information produced earlier or elsewhere. 

This process starts with the Secretariat requesting Member States to contribute analytical data on a mutually agreed basis in the most cost-efficient way. More than 90 % of the analytical data in OCAD has been contributed free of charge to the Secretariat. These analytical data are validated before they are proposed for incorporation into the OCAD. Once a batch of analytical data has been technically validated, approval is obtained from the Member States for the incorporation of these spectra into the OCAD. 

Criteria for the validation of new analytical data for updating the OPCW Central Analytical Database (S/147/99, dated 12 November 1999). 

Data Elements Use this section to provide thorough and complete documentation of the validation of the analytical method. Include summaries of experimental data and calculations substantiating each of the applicable analytical performance parameters. These parameters are described in the following section. 

The frequency of the control sample analysis depends on the nature of the analysis. Successful analysis of the control samples assures that the system is performing as expected under the SOP. Validation of HPLC equipment assures that valid measurements are obtained. The quality of the analytical data can be maintained by keeping, in a safe place, records of the actual instrument conditions at the time the measurements were made. Backups should also be maintained. 

Empirical formulas for the products from each melt system were obtained we assumed that oxygen was the other constituent of the compounds. The elemental ratios are subject to some variation because of uncertainties in the analytical data. The uranium analyses are estimated to be valid within 2%. Independent analytical determinations have shown that the original uranium dioxide contained approximately 0.5% iron, plus a trace of silica. Adjustment of the analytical data for these minor impurities was not done. 

The original manufacturing formula (HV) and five variations are performed in the first step of the synthesis. Six samples are analysed. The results of these six analyses are used to assess the validation of this process step. In this case validation of the analytical method is a prerequisite for any decision that is made about the validity of the process. This information is needed before the process research chemist can start variations of the process otherwise it is possible that the data received cannot be assessed. The difficulty of assessing the data of the process validation results from the fact that the data is influenced by the analytical method and the uncertainty of the chemical process. If the uncertainty of the analytical method is larger or in the same range as the variations of the chemical process, assessment of the data is not possible. 

The estimation of uncertainty replaces a full validation of the analytical method. It generates the necessary information at the right time. The statistical information received from the analysis can be used for the interpretation of the data and finally the analysis is designed to the customers needs. In this case measurement uncertainty is a good alternative to validation. 

As with IQ, there will be a need for the validators of the analytical equipment interface to perform functional testing of the analytical equipment independently of the core LIMS supplier. Only when the analysis equipment has been demonstrated to function correctly should the equipment be coimected as a iive data source for the core LIMS. 

The method is also depi. ndent, of course, on the degree of quality assurance exercised to assure that the physical system matches the risk projection model being used. A final consideration is the validity of the analytical methods utilized to generate the consequence data. 

In all these applications, isotope ratio data are produced, which are interpreted on an absolute or relative basis and which have an impact on our daily life, whether this is in science (e.g., age of an artifact), in society (e.g., provenance of food), or in public safety (e.g., neutron shielding in nuclear power plants). To ensure that these data are reliable and accurate, some specific requirements have to be fulfilled. The main requirement is that all these measurement results are comparable, which means that the corresponding results can be compared and differences between the measurement results can be used to draw further conclusions. This is only possible if the measurement results are traceable to the same reference [25]. This in turn can only be realized by applying isotopic reference materials (IRMs) for correction for bias and for validation of the analytical procedure. Whereas in earlier days only experts in mass spectrometry were able to deliver reproducible isotope ratio data, nowadays many laboratories, some of which may even have never been involved with mass spectrometry before, produce isotope ratio data using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Especially for such users, IRMs are indispensable to permit proper method validation and reliable results. The rapid development and the broad availability of ICP-MS instrumentation have also led to an expansion of the research area and new elements are under investigation for their isotopic variations. In this context, all users require IRMs to correct for instrumental mass discrimination or at least to allow isotope ratio data to be related to a commonly accepted basis. 

In addition to the validation of the analytical method, routine methods should include several controls to ensure the quality of the reported data [32,37]. The most usual approach consists of the injection of blank samples spiked at the LOQ and 10 x LOQ levels, that is, quality controls (QC), in each batch of samples analyzed. For quality control compliance, a QC recovery range of 60—140% is used in routine multiresidue analysis [32]. Recoveries outside this range would require reanalysis of the sample batch. Results for samples that exceed MRL residue levels must be supported by individual recovery results in the same batch within the range of the mean recovery (70—120%) 2 RSD (relative standard deviation), at least for the confirmatory analyses. 

One of the main purposes of measuring NIR data is the determination of chemical composition or physical properties in a quantitative way. The principle of the measurement procedure for quantitative analysis is based on recording the NIR spectra of reference samples (the number depending on the number of components or parameters to be determined) of known composition. The levels of the constituents or the physical parameters are determined by independent, conventional analytical or physical methods. Then the set of reference spectra and the independently determined values of the parameters under investigation are used by a selected statistical method to build a calibration. This enables unknown samples to be evaluated with regard to the individual parameters of interest. The accuracy of the NIR technique depends upon the validity of the calibration data set, which must incorporate the entire range of concentrations that will be determined by the instrument. This set must contain samples with varying ratios of each component. NIR calibrations do not typically extrapolate or interpolate well across concentrations. Typical calibration sets include more than... 

Transferability of the analytical data is related to the appropriate analytical validation in order to provide robust and standard operatiOTial procedures for practical use in routine analytical work or in control programs. In case of electrochemical sensors the validation step is still a hurdle to be overcome that requires additional further works. ... 

The most visible part of the analytical approach occurs in the laboratory. As part of the validation process, appropriate chemical or physical standards are used to calibrate any equipment being used and any solutions whose concentrations must be known. The selected samples are then analyzed and the raw data recorded. 

The method was validated in accordance to the guidelines of the international conference on harmonization (ICH). Data with respect to accuracy, within- and between run precision, recovery, detection and quantitation limits were reported and found to be within the accepted international criteria. Neither endogeneous substances nor the commonly used dmgs were found to interfere with the retention times of the analytes. Standard solutions of the dmg and quality control preparations at high and low level concentrations were demonstrated to be stable at room temperature and/or -20°C for long and short periods of time. 

Having demonstrated that our simulation reproduces the neutron data reasonably well, we may critically evaluate the models used to interpret the data. For the models to be analytically tractable, it is generally assumed that the center-of-mass and internal motions are decoupled so that the total intermediate scattering function can be written as a product of the expression for the center-of-mass motion and that for the internal motions. We have confirmed the validity of the decoupling assumption over a wide range of Q (data not shown). In the next two sections we take a closer look at our simulation to see to what extent the dynamics is consistent with models used to describe the dynamics. We discuss the motion of the center of mass in the next section and the internal dynamics of the hydrocarbon chains in Section IV.F. 

Validly relating the measurement data to the source environment within the limitations of the sampling and analytical operations... 

---